Cite Article

Lithofacies Classification Using Supervised and Semi-Supervised Machine Learning Approach

Choose citation format

BibTeX

@article{IJASEIT11764,
   author = {Lilik T. Hardanto and Lili Ayu Wulandhari},
   title = {Lithofacies Classification Using Supervised and Semi-Supervised Machine Learning Approach},
   journal = {International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology},
   volume = {11},
   number = {2},
   year = {2021},
   pages = {542--548},
   keywords = {Machine learning; decision tree; SVM; naïve bayes; lithofacies; supervised; semi-supervise learning.},
   abstract = {The machine learning approach can help Geoscientists do their work in well log analysis to developing the oil and gas field. Prediction categorical or numerical response variable using a set of predictor variables supervises and semi-supervises learning is an important goal of the machine learning approach in classifying lithofacies using well log data. Semi-supervised classification offers the possibility of exploring the structure of the data without entirely external knowledge or guidance in the form of target or class information, and semi-supervised is very rarely research in the field of lithofacies classification.  Well log data in gamma-ray, resistivity, neutrality, and density logs are collected and selected for data processing and transformation. The use of machine learning algorithms such as Naïve Bayes, SVM, and Decision Tree is to find the log pattern or pattern classifications of lithofacies in supervised and semi-supervised to create a model with conditions requiring the change of data and the corresponding requirements. All supervised machine learning algorithms have the best accuracy because algorithms provide useful predictive in classifications based on the target but not if there are no targets given or semi-supervised. This paper compares some of the famous classification algorithms of machine learning, such as Decision tree, SVM, and Naïve Bayes, on classifying lithofacies with supervised and semi-supervised learning. This research found that the semi-supervised learning of Naïve Bayes has performed well in classified lithofacies. In contrast, in supervised learning, Decision Tree and SVM are superior in accuracy and visualization approach based on expert’s interpretation.},
   issn = {2088-5334},
   publisher = {INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development},
   url = {http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=11764},
   doi = {10.18517/ijaseit.11.2.11764}
}

EndNote

%A Hardanto, Lilik T.
%A Wulandhari, Lili Ayu
%D 2021
%T Lithofacies Classification Using Supervised and Semi-Supervised Machine Learning Approach
%B 2021
%9 Machine learning; decision tree; SVM; naïve bayes; lithofacies; supervised; semi-supervise learning.
%! Lithofacies Classification Using Supervised and Semi-Supervised Machine Learning Approach
%K Machine learning; decision tree; SVM; naïve bayes; lithofacies; supervised; semi-supervise learning.
%X The machine learning approach can help Geoscientists do their work in well log analysis to developing the oil and gas field. Prediction categorical or numerical response variable using a set of predictor variables supervises and semi-supervises learning is an important goal of the machine learning approach in classifying lithofacies using well log data. Semi-supervised classification offers the possibility of exploring the structure of the data without entirely external knowledge or guidance in the form of target or class information, and semi-supervised is very rarely research in the field of lithofacies classification.  Well log data in gamma-ray, resistivity, neutrality, and density logs are collected and selected for data processing and transformation. The use of machine learning algorithms such as Naïve Bayes, SVM, and Decision Tree is to find the log pattern or pattern classifications of lithofacies in supervised and semi-supervised to create a model with conditions requiring the change of data and the corresponding requirements. All supervised machine learning algorithms have the best accuracy because algorithms provide useful predictive in classifications based on the target but not if there are no targets given or semi-supervised. This paper compares some of the famous classification algorithms of machine learning, such as Decision tree, SVM, and Naïve Bayes, on classifying lithofacies with supervised and semi-supervised learning. This research found that the semi-supervised learning of Naïve Bayes has performed well in classified lithofacies. In contrast, in supervised learning, Decision Tree and SVM are superior in accuracy and visualization approach based on expert’s interpretation.
%U http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=11764
%R doi:10.18517/ijaseit.11.2.11764
%J International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology
%V 11
%N 2
%@ 2088-5334

IEEE

Lilik T. Hardanto and Lili Ayu Wulandhari,"Lithofacies Classification Using Supervised and Semi-Supervised Machine Learning Approach," International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 542-548, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.11.2.11764.

RefMan/ProCite (RIS)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hardanto, Lilik T.
AU  - Wulandhari, Lili Ayu
PY  - 2021
TI  - Lithofacies Classification Using Supervised and Semi-Supervised Machine Learning Approach
JF  - International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology; Vol. 11 (2021) No. 2
Y2  - 2021
SP  - 542
EP  - 548
SN  - 2088-5334
PB  - INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
KW  - Machine learning; decision tree; SVM; naïve bayes; lithofacies; supervised; semi-supervise learning.
N2  - The machine learning approach can help Geoscientists do their work in well log analysis to developing the oil and gas field. Prediction categorical or numerical response variable using a set of predictor variables supervises and semi-supervises learning is an important goal of the machine learning approach in classifying lithofacies using well log data. Semi-supervised classification offers the possibility of exploring the structure of the data without entirely external knowledge or guidance in the form of target or class information, and semi-supervised is very rarely research in the field of lithofacies classification.  Well log data in gamma-ray, resistivity, neutrality, and density logs are collected and selected for data processing and transformation. The use of machine learning algorithms such as Naïve Bayes, SVM, and Decision Tree is to find the log pattern or pattern classifications of lithofacies in supervised and semi-supervised to create a model with conditions requiring the change of data and the corresponding requirements. All supervised machine learning algorithms have the best accuracy because algorithms provide useful predictive in classifications based on the target but not if there are no targets given or semi-supervised. This paper compares some of the famous classification algorithms of machine learning, such as Decision tree, SVM, and Naïve Bayes, on classifying lithofacies with supervised and semi-supervised learning. This research found that the semi-supervised learning of Naïve Bayes has performed well in classified lithofacies. In contrast, in supervised learning, Decision Tree and SVM are superior in accuracy and visualization approach based on expert’s interpretation.
UR  - http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=11764
DO  - 10.18517/ijaseit.11.2.11764

RefWorks

RT Journal Article
ID 11764
A1 Hardanto, Lilik T.
A1 Wulandhari, Lili Ayu
T1 Lithofacies Classification Using Supervised and Semi-Supervised Machine Learning Approach
JF International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology
VO 11
IS 2
YR 2021
SP 542
OP 548
SN 2088-5334
PB INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
K1 Machine learning; decision tree; SVM; naïve bayes; lithofacies; supervised; semi-supervise learning.
AB The machine learning approach can help Geoscientists do their work in well log analysis to developing the oil and gas field. Prediction categorical or numerical response variable using a set of predictor variables supervises and semi-supervises learning is an important goal of the machine learning approach in classifying lithofacies using well log data. Semi-supervised classification offers the possibility of exploring the structure of the data without entirely external knowledge or guidance in the form of target or class information, and semi-supervised is very rarely research in the field of lithofacies classification.  Well log data in gamma-ray, resistivity, neutrality, and density logs are collected and selected for data processing and transformation. The use of machine learning algorithms such as Naïve Bayes, SVM, and Decision Tree is to find the log pattern or pattern classifications of lithofacies in supervised and semi-supervised to create a model with conditions requiring the change of data and the corresponding requirements. All supervised machine learning algorithms have the best accuracy because algorithms provide useful predictive in classifications based on the target but not if there are no targets given or semi-supervised. This paper compares some of the famous classification algorithms of machine learning, such as Decision tree, SVM, and Naïve Bayes, on classifying lithofacies with supervised and semi-supervised learning. This research found that the semi-supervised learning of Naïve Bayes has performed well in classified lithofacies. In contrast, in supervised learning, Decision Tree and SVM are superior in accuracy and visualization approach based on expert’s interpretation.
LK http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=11764
DO  - 10.18517/ijaseit.11.2.11764