Cite Article

Analysis of the Information Transfer Rate-ITR in Linear and Non-linear Feature Extraction Methods for SSVEP Signals

Choose citation format

BibTeX

@article{IJASEIT14309,
   author = {Danni De la Cruz and Wilfredo Alfonso and Eduardo Caicedo},
   title = {Analysis of the Information Transfer Rate-ITR in Linear and  Non-linear Feature Extraction Methods for SSVEP Signals},
   journal = {International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology},
   volume = {11},
   number = {2},
   year = {2021},
   pages = {761--768},
   keywords = {Steady-state visually evoked potential; brain-computer interfaces; information transfer rate; canonical correlation analysis; empirical mode decomposition.},
   abstract = {

The most popular paradigm in BCIs is the steady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) due to their advantages, such as the high information transfer rate (ITR), the time spent on users in the training phase, and the capacity to discriminate each stimulus. One of the most influential factors in the ITR evaluation is the feature extraction methods since these can increase the accuracy. Here, we compare nine methods for the extraction of features from SSVEP signals to identify those with better performance, according to the time window (TW), its technology (equipment and number of nodes), and the value of ITR.  The study identifies two groups: the first one is characterized by presenting variations of correlated component analysis (CCA), which is highly used to increase the ITR due to its efficiency in classification and its capacity of response to reduction (TW), such as MsetCCA, IT-CCA, FBCCA; the second one are the representation special based methods that consider the non-linear nature of the electroencephalogram (EEG) signal such as TRCA, CORRCA, EMD, and VMD. The results show a considerable difference between these groups. The maximum ITR value for FBCCA was 117.75 [bits/min] in a TW of 1.25s, while the VMD method achieved 3120 [bits/min] in a TW of 1s, respectively. The comparison covers signals between 0.55 and 8 seconds, taking into account visual strain, the experimental environment, and other artifacts.

},    issn = {2088-5334},    publisher = {INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development},    url = {http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=14309},    doi = {10.18517/ijaseit.11.2.14309} }

EndNote

%A De la Cruz, Danni
%A Alfonso, Wilfredo
%A Caicedo, Eduardo
%D 2021
%T Analysis of the Information Transfer Rate-ITR in Linear and  Non-linear Feature Extraction Methods for SSVEP Signals
%B 2021
%9 Steady-state visually evoked potential; brain-computer interfaces; information transfer rate; canonical correlation analysis; empirical mode decomposition.
%! Analysis of the Information Transfer Rate-ITR in Linear and  Non-linear Feature Extraction Methods for SSVEP Signals
%K Steady-state visually evoked potential; brain-computer interfaces; information transfer rate; canonical correlation analysis; empirical mode decomposition.
%X 

The most popular paradigm in BCIs is the steady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) due to their advantages, such as the high information transfer rate (ITR), the time spent on users in the training phase, and the capacity to discriminate each stimulus. One of the most influential factors in the ITR evaluation is the feature extraction methods since these can increase the accuracy. Here, we compare nine methods for the extraction of features from SSVEP signals to identify those with better performance, according to the time window (TW), its technology (equipment and number of nodes), and the value of ITR.  The study identifies two groups: the first one is characterized by presenting variations of correlated component analysis (CCA), which is highly used to increase the ITR due to its efficiency in classification and its capacity of response to reduction (TW), such as MsetCCA, IT-CCA, FBCCA; the second one are the representation special based methods that consider the non-linear nature of the electroencephalogram (EEG) signal such as TRCA, CORRCA, EMD, and VMD. The results show a considerable difference between these groups. The maximum ITR value for FBCCA was 117.75 [bits/min] in a TW of 1.25s, while the VMD method achieved 3120 [bits/min] in a TW of 1s, respectively. The comparison covers signals between 0.55 and 8 seconds, taking into account visual strain, the experimental environment, and other artifacts.

%U http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=14309 %R doi:10.18517/ijaseit.11.2.14309 %J International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology %V 11 %N 2 %@ 2088-5334

IEEE

Danni De la Cruz,Wilfredo Alfonso and Eduardo Caicedo,"Analysis of the Information Transfer Rate-ITR in Linear and  Non-linear Feature Extraction Methods for SSVEP Signals," International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 761-768, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.11.2.14309.

RefMan/ProCite (RIS)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - De la Cruz, Danni
AU  - Alfonso, Wilfredo
AU  - Caicedo, Eduardo
PY  - 2021
TI  - Analysis of the Information Transfer Rate-ITR in Linear and  Non-linear Feature Extraction Methods for SSVEP Signals
JF  - International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology; Vol. 11 (2021) No. 2
Y2  - 2021
SP  - 761
EP  - 768
SN  - 2088-5334
PB  - INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
KW  - Steady-state visually evoked potential; brain-computer interfaces; information transfer rate; canonical correlation analysis; empirical mode decomposition.
N2  - 

The most popular paradigm in BCIs is the steady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) due to their advantages, such as the high information transfer rate (ITR), the time spent on users in the training phase, and the capacity to discriminate each stimulus. One of the most influential factors in the ITR evaluation is the feature extraction methods since these can increase the accuracy. Here, we compare nine methods for the extraction of features from SSVEP signals to identify those with better performance, according to the time window (TW), its technology (equipment and number of nodes), and the value of ITR.  The study identifies two groups: the first one is characterized by presenting variations of correlated component analysis (CCA), which is highly used to increase the ITR due to its efficiency in classification and its capacity of response to reduction (TW), such as MsetCCA, IT-CCA, FBCCA; the second one are the representation special based methods that consider the non-linear nature of the electroencephalogram (EEG) signal such as TRCA, CORRCA, EMD, and VMD. The results show a considerable difference between these groups. The maximum ITR value for FBCCA was 117.75 [bits/min] in a TW of 1.25s, while the VMD method achieved 3120 [bits/min] in a TW of 1s, respectively. The comparison covers signals between 0.55 and 8 seconds, taking into account visual strain, the experimental environment, and other artifacts.

UR - http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=14309 DO - 10.18517/ijaseit.11.2.14309

RefWorks

RT Journal Article
ID 14309
A1 De la Cruz, Danni
A1 Alfonso, Wilfredo
A1 Caicedo, Eduardo
T1 Analysis of the Information Transfer Rate-ITR in Linear and  Non-linear Feature Extraction Methods for SSVEP Signals
JF International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology
VO 11
IS 2
YR 2021
SP 761
OP 768
SN 2088-5334
PB INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
K1 Steady-state visually evoked potential; brain-computer interfaces; information transfer rate; canonical correlation analysis; empirical mode decomposition.
AB 

The most popular paradigm in BCIs is the steady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) due to their advantages, such as the high information transfer rate (ITR), the time spent on users in the training phase, and the capacity to discriminate each stimulus. One of the most influential factors in the ITR evaluation is the feature extraction methods since these can increase the accuracy. Here, we compare nine methods for the extraction of features from SSVEP signals to identify those with better performance, according to the time window (TW), its technology (equipment and number of nodes), and the value of ITR.  The study identifies two groups: the first one is characterized by presenting variations of correlated component analysis (CCA), which is highly used to increase the ITR due to its efficiency in classification and its capacity of response to reduction (TW), such as MsetCCA, IT-CCA, FBCCA; the second one are the representation special based methods that consider the non-linear nature of the electroencephalogram (EEG) signal such as TRCA, CORRCA, EMD, and VMD. The results show a considerable difference between these groups. The maximum ITR value for FBCCA was 117.75 [bits/min] in a TW of 1.25s, while the VMD method achieved 3120 [bits/min] in a TW of 1s, respectively. The comparison covers signals between 0.55 and 8 seconds, taking into account visual strain, the experimental environment, and other artifacts.

LK http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=14309 DO - 10.18517/ijaseit.11.2.14309