BibTeX
@article{IJASEIT15824,
author = {Dayana Tito Gonzagaa and José Ricardo Durán Carrillo and Carolina Robalino Bedón and Theofilos Toulkeridis},
title = {Determination of Compression Stress and Volumetric Weight of Lightened Concrete Blocks, with the Use of Recycled Polymers and Nanoadditives},
journal = {International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology},
volume = {12},
number = {3},
year = {2022},
pages = {1023--1031},
keywords = {Masonry; copolymer; PET; resistance; nanoadditive.},
abstract = {The current study describes the development and evaluation of hollow concrete blocks using recycled polymers and a waterproof, resistance improver nanoadditive together with cement, sand, and pumice to search for an ecological building material capable of reducing the environmental pollution. Three phases were performed; in which the first, we characterized petrous aggregates, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and the nanoadditive. In the second one, several dosages were established with different percentages of crushed PET that represented to the sand. Additionally, a nanoadditive's part was placed in relation to the total water of the mixture. In the third phase, the compressive stress, volumetric weight, and absorption of the elaborated specimens were determined according to the national standard. The resulting optimal dosage was about 25% PET in replacement of sand + 0.0087 kg of nanoadditive, able to generate a better quality material, obtaining a compressive strength of 36.5 kg/cm2, very close to the normative (40 kg/cm2) and superior to the of commercial blocks (14.35 kg/cm2). Regarding the volumetric weights, the plastic had a good performance as it managed to reduce the weight by 20%, while the use of the nanoadditive waterproofing decreased by 25% of water absorption. The block of the current research was twice as expensive as the traditional, even if production is tripled, as it was reduced to only $ 0.06 (8%). However, in comparison with the industrially elaborated procedure, the costs are very similar.},
issn = {2088-5334},
publisher = {INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development},
url = {http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=15824},
doi = {10.18517/ijaseit.12.3.15824}
}
EndNote
%A Tito Gonzagaa, Dayana
%A Durán Carrillo, José Ricardo
%A Robalino Bedón, Carolina
%A Toulkeridis, Theofilos
%D 2022
%T Determination of Compression Stress and Volumetric Weight of Lightened Concrete Blocks, with the Use of Recycled Polymers and Nanoadditives
%B 2022
%9 Masonry; copolymer; PET; resistance; nanoadditive.
%! Determination of Compression Stress and Volumetric Weight of Lightened Concrete Blocks, with the Use of Recycled Polymers and Nanoadditives
%K Masonry; copolymer; PET; resistance; nanoadditive.
%X The current study describes the development and evaluation of hollow concrete blocks using recycled polymers and a waterproof, resistance improver nanoadditive together with cement, sand, and pumice to search for an ecological building material capable of reducing the environmental pollution. Three phases were performed; in which the first, we characterized petrous aggregates, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and the nanoadditive. In the second one, several dosages were established with different percentages of crushed PET that represented to the sand. Additionally, a nanoadditive's part was placed in relation to the total water of the mixture. In the third phase, the compressive stress, volumetric weight, and absorption of the elaborated specimens were determined according to the national standard. The resulting optimal dosage was about 25% PET in replacement of sand + 0.0087 kg of nanoadditive, able to generate a better quality material, obtaining a compressive strength of 36.5 kg/cm2, very close to the normative (40 kg/cm2) and superior to the of commercial blocks (14.35 kg/cm2). Regarding the volumetric weights, the plastic had a good performance as it managed to reduce the weight by 20%, while the use of the nanoadditive waterproofing decreased by 25% of water absorption. The block of the current research was twice as expensive as the traditional, even if production is tripled, as it was reduced to only $ 0.06 (8%). However, in comparison with the industrially elaborated procedure, the costs are very similar.
%U http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=15824
%R doi:10.18517/ijaseit.12.3.15824
%J International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology
%V 12
%N 3
%@ 2088-5334
IEEE
Dayana Tito Gonzagaa,José Ricardo Durán Carrillo,Carolina Robalino Bedón and Theofilos Toulkeridis,"Determination of Compression Stress and Volumetric Weight of Lightened Concrete Blocks, with the Use of Recycled Polymers and Nanoadditives," International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1023-1031, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.12.3.15824.
RefMan/ProCite (RIS)
TY - JOUR
AU - Tito Gonzagaa, Dayana
AU - Durán Carrillo, José Ricardo
AU - Robalino Bedón, Carolina
AU - Toulkeridis, Theofilos
PY - 2022
TI - Determination of Compression Stress and Volumetric Weight of Lightened Concrete Blocks, with the Use of Recycled Polymers and Nanoadditives
JF - International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology; Vol. 12 (2022) No. 3
Y2 - 2022
SP - 1023
EP - 1031
SN - 2088-5334
PB - INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
KW - Masonry; copolymer; PET; resistance; nanoadditive.
N2 - The current study describes the development and evaluation of hollow concrete blocks using recycled polymers and a waterproof, resistance improver nanoadditive together with cement, sand, and pumice to search for an ecological building material capable of reducing the environmental pollution. Three phases were performed; in which the first, we characterized petrous aggregates, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and the nanoadditive. In the second one, several dosages were established with different percentages of crushed PET that represented to the sand. Additionally, a nanoadditive's part was placed in relation to the total water of the mixture. In the third phase, the compressive stress, volumetric weight, and absorption of the elaborated specimens were determined according to the national standard. The resulting optimal dosage was about 25% PET in replacement of sand + 0.0087 kg of nanoadditive, able to generate a better quality material, obtaining a compressive strength of 36.5 kg/cm2, very close to the normative (40 kg/cm2) and superior to the of commercial blocks (14.35 kg/cm2). Regarding the volumetric weights, the plastic had a good performance as it managed to reduce the weight by 20%, while the use of the nanoadditive waterproofing decreased by 25% of water absorption. The block of the current research was twice as expensive as the traditional, even if production is tripled, as it was reduced to only $ 0.06 (8%). However, in comparison with the industrially elaborated procedure, the costs are very similar.
UR - http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=15824
DO - 10.18517/ijaseit.12.3.15824
RefWorks
RT Journal Article
ID 15824
A1 Tito Gonzagaa, Dayana
A1 Durán Carrillo, José Ricardo
A1 Robalino Bedón, Carolina
A1 Toulkeridis, Theofilos
T1 Determination of Compression Stress and Volumetric Weight of Lightened Concrete Blocks, with the Use of Recycled Polymers and Nanoadditives
JF International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology
VO 12
IS 3
YR 2022
SP 1023
OP 1031
SN 2088-5334
PB INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
K1 Masonry; copolymer; PET; resistance; nanoadditive.
AB The current study describes the development and evaluation of hollow concrete blocks using recycled polymers and a waterproof, resistance improver nanoadditive together with cement, sand, and pumice to search for an ecological building material capable of reducing the environmental pollution. Three phases were performed; in which the first, we characterized petrous aggregates, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and the nanoadditive. In the second one, several dosages were established with different percentages of crushed PET that represented to the sand. Additionally, a nanoadditive's part was placed in relation to the total water of the mixture. In the third phase, the compressive stress, volumetric weight, and absorption of the elaborated specimens were determined according to the national standard. The resulting optimal dosage was about 25% PET in replacement of sand + 0.0087 kg of nanoadditive, able to generate a better quality material, obtaining a compressive strength of 36.5 kg/cm2, very close to the normative (40 kg/cm2) and superior to the of commercial blocks (14.35 kg/cm2). Regarding the volumetric weights, the plastic had a good performance as it managed to reduce the weight by 20%, while the use of the nanoadditive waterproofing decreased by 25% of water absorption. The block of the current research was twice as expensive as the traditional, even if production is tripled, as it was reduced to only $ 0.06 (8%). However, in comparison with the industrially elaborated procedure, the costs are very similar.
LK http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=15824
DO - 10.18517/ijaseit.12.3.15824
