Cite Article

Assessing the Tensile Capacity of Cold-Formed Steel Connections using Self-Drilling Screws and Adhesive Materials

Choose citation format

BibTeX

@article{IJASEIT4314,
   author = {Indra Komara and Endah Wahyuni and Priyo Suprobo and Kıvanç Taşkin},
   title = {Assessing the Tensile Capacity of Cold-Formed Steel Connections using Self-Drilling Screws and Adhesive Materials},
   journal = {International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology},
   volume = {8},
   number = {2},
   year = {2018},
   pages = {397--404},
   keywords = {cold-formed steel; connection; adhesive; experimental; strength capacity; behaviour},
   abstract = {This paper presents a review of the proposed design for assessing the tensile capacity of a simply truss framing system of cold-formed steel. A series of connection tests were made to investigate the capacity of connections by its deformation and load caring capacity. Furthermore, Screw connections were compared to adhesive connections. Those were created of 1 screw to 3 installed screw using 8 mm screw. On the other hand, 50%, 75% and 100% percentage of adhesive, i.e., A3M and ASK were also added to be evaluated. As a result, the experimental condition was carried out for developing a model to predict the performance capacity of each specimen. The test specimens are a single lap C connection with one end fixed by a grip, and the other end is tensioned. Each specimen was subjected to the load maximum capacity and the load deformation behaviour. The adhesive material was made of the total area of screw connection which is controlled by the volume of its area. Further, the comparison connection was considered for the analysis of the connection capacity, which was estimated from the specimen’s maximum load and the load-deformation behaviour. This research is also considered to face the problem of significant fracture mechanism and used as a further alternative solution. As a result, both adhesive materials could easily displace screw connection. ASK has a lower strength capacity than A3M but implied a better fracture mechanism. It was offered nearly similar behaviour and was suggested to evaluate the behaviour of screw-adhesive connection in advance.},
   issn = {2088-5334},
   publisher = {INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development},
   url = {http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=4314},
   doi = {10.18517/ijaseit.8.2.4314}
}

EndNote

%A Komara, Indra
%A Wahyuni, Endah
%A Suprobo, Priyo
%A Taşkin, Kıvanç
%D 2018
%T Assessing the Tensile Capacity of Cold-Formed Steel Connections using Self-Drilling Screws and Adhesive Materials
%B 2018
%9 cold-formed steel; connection; adhesive; experimental; strength capacity; behaviour
%! Assessing the Tensile Capacity of Cold-Formed Steel Connections using Self-Drilling Screws and Adhesive Materials
%K cold-formed steel; connection; adhesive; experimental; strength capacity; behaviour
%X This paper presents a review of the proposed design for assessing the tensile capacity of a simply truss framing system of cold-formed steel. A series of connection tests were made to investigate the capacity of connections by its deformation and load caring capacity. Furthermore, Screw connections were compared to adhesive connections. Those were created of 1 screw to 3 installed screw using 8 mm screw. On the other hand, 50%, 75% and 100% percentage of adhesive, i.e., A3M and ASK were also added to be evaluated. As a result, the experimental condition was carried out for developing a model to predict the performance capacity of each specimen. The test specimens are a single lap C connection with one end fixed by a grip, and the other end is tensioned. Each specimen was subjected to the load maximum capacity and the load deformation behaviour. The adhesive material was made of the total area of screw connection which is controlled by the volume of its area. Further, the comparison connection was considered for the analysis of the connection capacity, which was estimated from the specimen’s maximum load and the load-deformation behaviour. This research is also considered to face the problem of significant fracture mechanism and used as a further alternative solution. As a result, both adhesive materials could easily displace screw connection. ASK has a lower strength capacity than A3M but implied a better fracture mechanism. It was offered nearly similar behaviour and was suggested to evaluate the behaviour of screw-adhesive connection in advance.
%U http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=4314
%R doi:10.18517/ijaseit.8.2.4314
%J International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology
%V 8
%N 2
%@ 2088-5334

IEEE

Indra Komara,Endah Wahyuni,Priyo Suprobo and Kıvanç Taşkin,"Assessing the Tensile Capacity of Cold-Formed Steel Connections using Self-Drilling Screws and Adhesive Materials," International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 397-404, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.8.2.4314.

RefMan/ProCite (RIS)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Komara, Indra
AU  - Wahyuni, Endah
AU  - Suprobo, Priyo
AU  - Taşkin, Kıvanç
PY  - 2018
TI  - Assessing the Tensile Capacity of Cold-Formed Steel Connections using Self-Drilling Screws and Adhesive Materials
JF  - International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology; Vol. 8 (2018) No. 2
Y2  - 2018
SP  - 397
EP  - 404
SN  - 2088-5334
PB  - INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
KW  - cold-formed steel; connection; adhesive; experimental; strength capacity; behaviour
N2  - This paper presents a review of the proposed design for assessing the tensile capacity of a simply truss framing system of cold-formed steel. A series of connection tests were made to investigate the capacity of connections by its deformation and load caring capacity. Furthermore, Screw connections were compared to adhesive connections. Those were created of 1 screw to 3 installed screw using 8 mm screw. On the other hand, 50%, 75% and 100% percentage of adhesive, i.e., A3M and ASK were also added to be evaluated. As a result, the experimental condition was carried out for developing a model to predict the performance capacity of each specimen. The test specimens are a single lap C connection with one end fixed by a grip, and the other end is tensioned. Each specimen was subjected to the load maximum capacity and the load deformation behaviour. The adhesive material was made of the total area of screw connection which is controlled by the volume of its area. Further, the comparison connection was considered for the analysis of the connection capacity, which was estimated from the specimen’s maximum load and the load-deformation behaviour. This research is also considered to face the problem of significant fracture mechanism and used as a further alternative solution. As a result, both adhesive materials could easily displace screw connection. ASK has a lower strength capacity than A3M but implied a better fracture mechanism. It was offered nearly similar behaviour and was suggested to evaluate the behaviour of screw-adhesive connection in advance.
UR  - http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=4314
DO  - 10.18517/ijaseit.8.2.4314

RefWorks

RT Journal Article
ID 4314
A1 Komara, Indra
A1 Wahyuni, Endah
A1 Suprobo, Priyo
A1 Taşkin, Kıvanç
T1 Assessing the Tensile Capacity of Cold-Formed Steel Connections using Self-Drilling Screws and Adhesive Materials
JF International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology
VO 8
IS 2
YR 2018
SP 397
OP 404
SN 2088-5334
PB INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
K1 cold-formed steel; connection; adhesive; experimental; strength capacity; behaviour
AB This paper presents a review of the proposed design for assessing the tensile capacity of a simply truss framing system of cold-formed steel. A series of connection tests were made to investigate the capacity of connections by its deformation and load caring capacity. Furthermore, Screw connections were compared to adhesive connections. Those were created of 1 screw to 3 installed screw using 8 mm screw. On the other hand, 50%, 75% and 100% percentage of adhesive, i.e., A3M and ASK were also added to be evaluated. As a result, the experimental condition was carried out for developing a model to predict the performance capacity of each specimen. The test specimens are a single lap C connection with one end fixed by a grip, and the other end is tensioned. Each specimen was subjected to the load maximum capacity and the load deformation behaviour. The adhesive material was made of the total area of screw connection which is controlled by the volume of its area. Further, the comparison connection was considered for the analysis of the connection capacity, which was estimated from the specimen’s maximum load and the load-deformation behaviour. This research is also considered to face the problem of significant fracture mechanism and used as a further alternative solution. As a result, both adhesive materials could easily displace screw connection. ASK has a lower strength capacity than A3M but implied a better fracture mechanism. It was offered nearly similar behaviour and was suggested to evaluate the behaviour of screw-adhesive connection in advance.
LK http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=4314
DO  - 10.18517/ijaseit.8.2.4314