Cite Article

Evaluation of Seismic Analysis Procedures for Concrete Moment-Resistant Frames with Horizontal Re-entrant Corners Irregularity

Choose citation format

BibTeX

@article{IJASEIT5851,
   author = {Anis S Shatnawi and Mazen Musmar and Laith I Gharaibeh},
   title = {Evaluation of Seismic Analysis Procedures for Concrete Moment-Resistant Frames with Horizontal Re-entrant Corners Irregularity},
   journal = {International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology},
   volume = {8},
   number = {3},
   year = {2018},
   pages = {876--881},
   keywords = {seismic analysis; equivalent lateral force; response spectrum; time history; irregularity; re-entrant corner},
   abstract = {Seismic design codes and standards such as the IBC 2012 and ASCE/SEI 7-10 allow using different seismic analysis procedures for buildings having horizontal re-entrant corner irregularity. However, such codes allow using Equivalent Lateral Force (ELF) procedure for buildings having re-entrant corner irregularity but not exceeding 50 m in height. The aim of this study is to quantify the limits on building height and on the percentage of re-entrant corner of building, where ELF procedure may not produce a reasonable results when compared to Response Spectrum (RS) and Response Time History (TH) procedures. Usually, these limits in seismic design standards are based on judgments and experience rather than quantification studies. Based on the results of this study, it is observed that using ELF method mostly overestimates maximum displacements and drift ratio. However, this method can be used safely up to 12-storey buildings, because the maximum underestimation of column shear forces for buildings with higher stories gives 30% less compared to other procedures. Moreover, it has been found that the maximum underestimation of column shear forces for buildings without re-entrant corner is 0% less than those with re-entrant corners. Furthermore, buildings analysed by ELF method are also exposed to have a higher percentage value of underestimation of column shear forces as the case of 12-story buildings with 40% less when compared to TH Procedure. In addition, the column at the re-entrant corner is not effectively affected until a re-entrant corner of 25% exists in buildings. Thus the ASCE/SEI 7-10’s limit for using ELF procedure for buildings with re-entrant corner irregularity may be increased from 15% to 25% with less conservative results.},
   issn = {2088-5334},
   publisher = {INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development},
   url = {http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=5851},
   doi = {10.18517/ijaseit.8.3.5851}
}

EndNote

%A Shatnawi, Anis S
%A Musmar, Mazen
%A Gharaibeh, Laith I
%D 2018
%T Evaluation of Seismic Analysis Procedures for Concrete Moment-Resistant Frames with Horizontal Re-entrant Corners Irregularity
%B 2018
%9 seismic analysis; equivalent lateral force; response spectrum; time history; irregularity; re-entrant corner
%! Evaluation of Seismic Analysis Procedures for Concrete Moment-Resistant Frames with Horizontal Re-entrant Corners Irregularity
%K seismic analysis; equivalent lateral force; response spectrum; time history; irregularity; re-entrant corner
%X Seismic design codes and standards such as the IBC 2012 and ASCE/SEI 7-10 allow using different seismic analysis procedures for buildings having horizontal re-entrant corner irregularity. However, such codes allow using Equivalent Lateral Force (ELF) procedure for buildings having re-entrant corner irregularity but not exceeding 50 m in height. The aim of this study is to quantify the limits on building height and on the percentage of re-entrant corner of building, where ELF procedure may not produce a reasonable results when compared to Response Spectrum (RS) and Response Time History (TH) procedures. Usually, these limits in seismic design standards are based on judgments and experience rather than quantification studies. Based on the results of this study, it is observed that using ELF method mostly overestimates maximum displacements and drift ratio. However, this method can be used safely up to 12-storey buildings, because the maximum underestimation of column shear forces for buildings with higher stories gives 30% less compared to other procedures. Moreover, it has been found that the maximum underestimation of column shear forces for buildings without re-entrant corner is 0% less than those with re-entrant corners. Furthermore, buildings analysed by ELF method are also exposed to have a higher percentage value of underestimation of column shear forces as the case of 12-story buildings with 40% less when compared to TH Procedure. In addition, the column at the re-entrant corner is not effectively affected until a re-entrant corner of 25% exists in buildings. Thus the ASCE/SEI 7-10’s limit for using ELF procedure for buildings with re-entrant corner irregularity may be increased from 15% to 25% with less conservative results.
%U http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=5851
%R doi:10.18517/ijaseit.8.3.5851
%J International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology
%V 8
%N 3
%@ 2088-5334

IEEE

Anis S Shatnawi,Mazen Musmar and Laith I Gharaibeh,"Evaluation of Seismic Analysis Procedures for Concrete Moment-Resistant Frames with Horizontal Re-entrant Corners Irregularity," International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 876-881, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.8.3.5851.

RefMan/ProCite (RIS)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Shatnawi, Anis S
AU  - Musmar, Mazen
AU  - Gharaibeh, Laith I
PY  - 2018
TI  - Evaluation of Seismic Analysis Procedures for Concrete Moment-Resistant Frames with Horizontal Re-entrant Corners Irregularity
JF  - International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology; Vol. 8 (2018) No. 3
Y2  - 2018
SP  - 876
EP  - 881
SN  - 2088-5334
PB  - INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
KW  - seismic analysis; equivalent lateral force; response spectrum; time history; irregularity; re-entrant corner
N2  - Seismic design codes and standards such as the IBC 2012 and ASCE/SEI 7-10 allow using different seismic analysis procedures for buildings having horizontal re-entrant corner irregularity. However, such codes allow using Equivalent Lateral Force (ELF) procedure for buildings having re-entrant corner irregularity but not exceeding 50 m in height. The aim of this study is to quantify the limits on building height and on the percentage of re-entrant corner of building, where ELF procedure may not produce a reasonable results when compared to Response Spectrum (RS) and Response Time History (TH) procedures. Usually, these limits in seismic design standards are based on judgments and experience rather than quantification studies. Based on the results of this study, it is observed that using ELF method mostly overestimates maximum displacements and drift ratio. However, this method can be used safely up to 12-storey buildings, because the maximum underestimation of column shear forces for buildings with higher stories gives 30% less compared to other procedures. Moreover, it has been found that the maximum underestimation of column shear forces for buildings without re-entrant corner is 0% less than those with re-entrant corners. Furthermore, buildings analysed by ELF method are also exposed to have a higher percentage value of underestimation of column shear forces as the case of 12-story buildings with 40% less when compared to TH Procedure. In addition, the column at the re-entrant corner is not effectively affected until a re-entrant corner of 25% exists in buildings. Thus the ASCE/SEI 7-10’s limit for using ELF procedure for buildings with re-entrant corner irregularity may be increased from 15% to 25% with less conservative results.
UR  - http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=5851
DO  - 10.18517/ijaseit.8.3.5851

RefWorks

RT Journal Article
ID 5851
A1 Shatnawi, Anis S
A1 Musmar, Mazen
A1 Gharaibeh, Laith I
T1 Evaluation of Seismic Analysis Procedures for Concrete Moment-Resistant Frames with Horizontal Re-entrant Corners Irregularity
JF International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology
VO 8
IS 3
YR 2018
SP 876
OP 881
SN 2088-5334
PB INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
K1 seismic analysis; equivalent lateral force; response spectrum; time history; irregularity; re-entrant corner
AB Seismic design codes and standards such as the IBC 2012 and ASCE/SEI 7-10 allow using different seismic analysis procedures for buildings having horizontal re-entrant corner irregularity. However, such codes allow using Equivalent Lateral Force (ELF) procedure for buildings having re-entrant corner irregularity but not exceeding 50 m in height. The aim of this study is to quantify the limits on building height and on the percentage of re-entrant corner of building, where ELF procedure may not produce a reasonable results when compared to Response Spectrum (RS) and Response Time History (TH) procedures. Usually, these limits in seismic design standards are based on judgments and experience rather than quantification studies. Based on the results of this study, it is observed that using ELF method mostly overestimates maximum displacements and drift ratio. However, this method can be used safely up to 12-storey buildings, because the maximum underestimation of column shear forces for buildings with higher stories gives 30% less compared to other procedures. Moreover, it has been found that the maximum underestimation of column shear forces for buildings without re-entrant corner is 0% less than those with re-entrant corners. Furthermore, buildings analysed by ELF method are also exposed to have a higher percentage value of underestimation of column shear forces as the case of 12-story buildings with 40% less when compared to TH Procedure. In addition, the column at the re-entrant corner is not effectively affected until a re-entrant corner of 25% exists in buildings. Thus the ASCE/SEI 7-10’s limit for using ELF procedure for buildings with re-entrant corner irregularity may be increased from 15% to 25% with less conservative results.
LK http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=5851
DO  - 10.18517/ijaseit.8.3.5851