DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.6.13197

A New Syntax of Teaching Factory IR 4.0 Model in Vocational Education

Surfa Yondri (1), - Ganefri (2), - Krismadinata (3), Nizwardi Jalinus (4), - Sukardi (5)
(1) Department of Electrical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Padang, Limau Manis, Padang, Sumatera Barat, 25164, Indonesia
(2) Technical and Vocational Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Air Tawar, Padang,25171, Indonesia
(3) Technical and Vocational Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Air Tawar, Padang,25171, Indonesia
(4) Technical and Vocational Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Air Tawar, Padang,25171, Indonesia
(5) Technical and Vocational Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Air Tawar, Padang,25171, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Yondri, Surfa, et al. “A New Syntax of Teaching Factory IR 4.0 Model in Vocational Education”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 10, no. 6, Dec. 2020, pp. 2270-5, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.10.6.13197.
Citation Format :
The competencies needed in the industrial revolution 4.0 (IR 4.0) era are critical thinking, creativity, communication, and collaboration. It is challenges and opportunities that exist in the period of IR 4.0 for vocational education. Therefore, it requires learning models that answer this. This study aimed to develop a new teaching factory model syntax that relevant to revolution industry 4.0. This study used mix qualitative and quantitative method. Syntax assessment was conducted through a focus group discussion attended by seven experts. Experts suggestions as qualitative data in this study and the qualitative method validated the experts’ model through a questionnaire. Questionnaire data analysis used Aiken’s V formula. A new syntax of the teaching factory model was developed based on three principals of the learning model, i.e., project-based learning, production-based learning, and teaching Factory. The implementation of the learning process was conducted by the hybrid system (face to face and online learning). Expert comments and suggestions are subject to fix and increase the completeness of a new syntax of teaching factory to be a learning model. Analysis results of expert validation showed that a new teaching factory model was valid and reliable to be applied in the learning process. Further study was needed to reveal the effect of new teaching factory syntax that is used in the learning process. Then, suggestions and revisions that might happen in further study.

D. Mourtzis, E. Vlachou, G. Dimitrakopoulos, and V. Zogopoulos, “Cyber- Physical Systems and Education 4. 0 - The Teaching Factory Physical Systems and Education Teaching Factory Costing models for capacity optimization in Industry between used capacity and operational efficiency,” in Procedia Manufacturing, 2018, vol. 23, no. 2017, pp. 129-134, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.005.

V. TÅ«tlys and G. Spí¶ttl, “From the analysis of work-processes to designing competence-based occupational standards and vocational curricula,” Eur. J. Train. Dev., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 50-66, 2017, doi: 10.1108/EJTD-10-2015-0078.

M. Janí­koví¡ and P. Kowalikoví¡, “Technical Education in the Context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” Open Online J. Res. Educ. Spec, no. December, pp. 65-73, 2017.

R. E. Wulansari, D. Puyada, I. Wijaya, and K. Rukun, “Effectiveness of Instructional Media Based Game On Mathematics At Vocational High School,” Int. J. Res. Sci. Manag., vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 125-128, 2017, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1134077.

R. H. Sakti, Sukardi, M. Giatman, E. Nazar, Wakhinuddin, and Waskito, “Flipped Classroom-Computer Based Instruction untuk Pembelajaran Revolusi Industri 4.0: Rancang Bangun dan Analisis Kebutuhan,” Edumatic J. Pendidik. Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 63-72, 2020, doi: 10.29408/edumatic. v4i1.2074.

Lamancusa, Zayas-Castro J, and Ratner, “The Learning Factory -- A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into Engineering Curricula,” 1995.

E. R. Alef and D. Berg, The Learning Factory. Lanham MD: University Press of America, 1996.

A. Kuswantoro, Teaching Factory: Rencana dan Nilai Entrepreneurship. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2014.

S. D. M. Nurtanto, Ramdani, and S. Nurhaji, “Pengembangan Model Teaching Factory di Sekolah Kejuruan,” 2017.

M. H. Dadang, “Model Pembelajaran Teaching Factory untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Siswa dalam Mata Pelajaran Produktif,” J. Ilmu Pendidik, vol. 17, no. 24, pp. 270-278, 2011.

A. Syaifuddin, Realibilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2014.

M. Rais, “Project Based-Learning: Inovasi Pembelajaran yang Berorientasi Soft skills,” Inov. Pembelajaran, pp. 1-18, 2018.

N. Nabawi and J. A., “Implementation of the PjBL model to enhance problem solving skill and skill competency of community college student,” J. Pendidik. Vokasi, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 304-311, 2017.

Ganefri, “The development of production-based learning approach to entrepreneurial spirit for engineering students,” Asian Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 12 SPL Issue, pp. 162-167, 2013, doi: 10.5539/ass. v9n12p162.

M. H. Dadang, “Model Pembelajaran Teaching Factory untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Siswa dalam Mata Pelajaran Produktif,” J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 270-278, 2011.

Syahril, R. A. Nabawi, and F. Prasetya, “The Instructional Media Development of Mechanical Drawing Course Based on Project-Based Learning,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 309-325, 2020.

N. Jalinus, Syahril, R. A. Nabawi, and Y. Arbi, “How Project-Based Learning and Direct Teaching Models Affect Teamwork and Welding Skills Among Students,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang, vol. 11, no. 11, 2020.

A. Yulastri, H. Hidayat, Ganefri, S. Islami, and F. Edya, “Developing an Entrepreneurship Module by Using Product-Based Learning Approach in Vocational Education,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1097-1109, 2017.

D. Mourtzis and E. Vlachou, “Augmented Reality supported Product Design towards Industry 4. 0: Augmented Reality supported Product Design towards Industry a Teaching Factory paradigm,” in Procedia Manufacturing, 2018, vol. 23, no. 2017, pp. 207-212, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.018.

Ambiyar, S. Yondri, D. Irfan, M. U. Putri, M. A. Zaus, and S. Islami, “Evaluation of Packet Tracer Application Effectiveness in Computer Design Networking Subject,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 54-59, 2019.

F. Eliza, D. E. Myori, O. Candra, and S. Islami, “The Validity of Trainer on Materials Science and Devices Subject at Department Of Electrical Engineering,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 09, pp. 642-645, 2019.

B. Xing and T. Marwala, “Implications of the Fourth Industrial Age on Higher Education,” Think. Third Quart., no. 73, 2017, doi: arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.09643.

A. Kuswantoro, Teaching Factory: Rencana dan Nilai Entrepreneurship. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2014.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).