Mechanical Properties of the Stereolithography Resin with Different Printing Configurations.

Fernanda Boada (1), Cosme Mejia-Echeverria (2), David Ojeda (3)
(1) Mechatronic Department-GISIBI research group, Universidad Técnica del Norte, Av. 17 de Julio 5-2, Ibarra, 100105, Ecuador
(2) Mechatronic Department-GISIBI research group, Universidad Técnica del Norte, Av. 17 de Julio 5-2, Ibarra, 100105, Ecuador
(3) Mechatronic Department-GISIBI research group, Universidad Técnica del Norte, Av. 17 de Julio 5-2, Ibarra, 100105, Ecuador
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Boada, Fernanda, et al. “Mechanical Properties of the Stereolithography Resin With Different Printing Configurations”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 12, no. 2, Apr. 2022, pp. 861-6, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.12.2.15292.
In the 3D printer market, there are several types of printing; among those found in the middle are fused filament deposition printing and stereolithography. In stereolithography, layers of resin are solidified employing UV rays. Each manufacturer offers different types of resins that react to light exposure. These usually have very general values in terms of their mechanical strength, with varying properties depending on the printing configurations. For this reason, the user, in many cases, must make trial and error prints to obtain the best possible printing configuration, generating expenses and waste of material. This research proposes establishing the appropriate printing parameters to obtain the best mechanical properties of the prototypes printed in the digital light process stereolithography printer of the Universidad Tecnica del Norte. A specimen fabrication process based on the ASTM D638 standard is established, in which the main printing configurations are varied, such as printing orientation, layer thickness, and light exposure time. Experimental tensile tests obtain deformation stress-strain curves. From this, the behavior of the printed material is obtained as linear elastic-fragile. The results obtained are compared concerning the maximum stress and strain, and the modulus of elasticity is calculated. The most suitable printing parameters are proposed to obtain the best results in stereolithography printing for the construction of functional prototypes.

S. and D. D. and G. R. and D. L. and A. J. and Y. A. and J. A. and S. D. and K. C. and I. P. Cantrell Jason and Rohde, “Experimental Characterization of the Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed ABS and Polycarbonate Parts,” in Advancement of Optical Methods in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3, 2017, pp. 89-105, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41600-7_11.

B. K. Suryatal, S. S. Sarawade, and S. P. Deshmukh, “Fabrication of medium scale 3D components using stereolithography system for rapid prototyping,” Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2021.02.012.

J. Borrello, P. Nasser, J. C. Iatridis, and K. D. Costa, “3D printing a mechanically-tunable acrylate resin on a commercial DLP-SLA printer,” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 23, pp. 374-380, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.019.

B. T. Phillips et al., “Additive manufacturing aboard a moving vessel at sea using passively stabilized stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing,” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 31, p. 100969, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100969.

C. D. Herní¡ndez Castellano et al., Tecnologí­as de Fabricación Aditiva. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran canaria, 2018.

A. Shrotri, M. Beyer, D. Schneider, and O. Stí¼bbe, “Manufacturing of lens array prototypes containing spherical and fresnel lenses for visible light communications using stereolithography apparatus,” in Laser 3D Manufacturing VIII, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1117/12.2586907.

K. and P. E. and K. S. and S. N. and V. J. Madheswaran S. and Sivakumar, “Applications of Additive Manufacturing—A Review,” in Advances in Materials Research, 2021, pp. 21-27, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8319-3_3.

JM. Jafferson and S. Pattanashetti, “Use of 3D printing in production of personal protective equipment (PPE) - a review,” Materials Today: Proceedings, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.072.

V. Lemarteleur et al., “3D-printed protected face shields for health care workers in Covid-19 pandemic,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 389-391, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.08.005.

S. Waheed et al., “3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers,” Lab Chip, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1993-2013, 2016, doi: 10.1039/C6LC00284F.

I. Chan, J. Au, C. Ho, and J. Lam, “Creation of 3D printed fashion prototype with multi-coloured texture: a practice-based approach,” International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 78-90, 2021, doi: 10.1080/17543266.2020.1861342.

C. Varghese, J. Wolodko, L. Chen, M. Doschak, P. P. Srivastav, and M. S. Roopesh, “Influence of Selected Product and Process Parameters on Microstructure, Rheological, and Textural Properties of 3D Printed Cookies,” Foods, vol. 9, no. 7, 2020, doi: 10.3390/foods9070907.

A. Quezada and A. Rigail, “Evaluacion De Polietilenos De Alta Densidad Reciclados Para Aplicaciones En Mobiliario Urbano,” 2007.

R. E. Rebong, K. T. Stewart, A. Utreja, and A. A. Ghoneima, “Accuracy of three-dimensional dental resin models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A comparative study,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 363-369, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.2319/071117-460.1.

D. T. Pham, S. S. Dimov, and R. S. Gault, “Part Orientation in Stereolithography,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 674-682, 1999, doi: 10.1007/s001700050118.

M. Manoj Prabhakar, A. K. Saravanan, A. Haiter Lenin, I. Jerin leno, K. Mayandi, and P. Sethu Ramalingam, “A short review on 3D printing methods, process parameters and materials,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 45, pp. 6108-6114, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.225.

G. Garrido Sí¡nchez, “Diseño y fabricación de un dedo protí©sico articulado mediante impresión 3D,” 2019.

T.-C. Yang and C.-H. Yeh, “Morphology and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Wood Fiber/Polylactic Acid Composite Parts Using Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): The Effects of Printing Speed,” Polymers, vol. 12, no. 6, 2020, doi: 10.3390/polym12061334.

M. Kamaal, M. Anas, H. Rastogi, N. Bhardwaj, and A. Rahaman, “Effect of FDM process parameters on mechanical properties of 3D-printed carbon fibre-PLA composite,” Progress in Additive Manufacturing, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 63-69, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40964-020-00145-3.

S. Wickramasinghe, T. Do, and P. Tran, “FDM-Based 3D Printing of Polymer and Associated Composite: A Review on Mechanical Properties, Defects and Treatments,” Polymers, vol. 12, no. 7, 2020, doi: 10.3390/polym12071529.

B. Msallem, N. Sharma, S. Cao, F. S. Halbeisen, H.-F. Zeilhofer, and F. M. Thieringer, “Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Anatomical Mandibular Models Using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ Printing Technology,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 9, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.3390/jcm9030817.

A. Katheng, M. Kanazawa, M. Iwaki, and S. Minakuchi, “Evaluation of dimensional accuracy and degree of polymerization of stereolithography photopolymer resin under different postpolymerization conditions: An in vitro study,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 695-702, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.023.

C. Schmidleithner, “Stereolithography,” in 3D Printing, D. M. K. E.-D. Cvetković, Ed. Rijeka: IntechOpen, 2018, p. Ch. 1.

Z. Tian, Y. Yang, Y. Wang, H. Wu, W. Liu, and S. Wu, “Fabrication and properties of a high porosity h-BN-SiO2 ceramics fabricated by stereolithography-based 3D printing,” Materials Letters, vol. 236, pp. 144-147, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.10.058.

A. Bagheri Saed, A. H. Behravesh, S. Hasannia, S. A. Alavinasab Ardebili, B. Akhoundi, and M. Pourghayoumi, “Functionalized poly l-lactic acid synthesis and optimization of process parameters for 3D printing of porous scaffolds via digital light processing (DLP) method,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 56, pp. 550-561, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.076.

H. Song, N. A. Rodriguez, C. C. Seepersad, R. H. Crawford, M. Chen, and E. B. Duoss, “Development of a variable tensioning system to reduce separation force in large scale stereolithography,” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 38, p. 101816, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101816.

Y. Sano, R. Matsuzaki, M. Ueda, A. Todoroki, and Y. Hirano, “3D printing of discontinuous and continuous fibre composites using stereolithography,” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 24, pp. 521-527, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.033.

I. Valizadeh, A. al Aboud, E. Dí¶rsam, and O. Weeger, “Tailoring of functionally graded hyperelastic materials via grayscale mask stereolithography 3D printing,” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 47, p. 102108, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102108.

R. He et al., “Fabrication of complex-shaped zirconia ceramic parts via a DLP- stereolithography-based 3D printing method,” Ceramics International, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 3412-3416, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.11.135.

A. della Bona, V. Cantelli, V. T. Britto, K. F. Collares, and J. W. Stansbury, “3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique: a systematic review,” Dental Materials, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 336-350, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.030.

H. Quan, T. Zhang, H. Xu, S. Luo, J. Nie, and X. Zhu, “Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges,” Bioactive Materials, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 110-115, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.003.

D. A. Komissarenko et al., “DLP 3D printing of scandia-stabilized zirconia ceramics,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 684-690, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.09.010.

P. A. Heredia López and C. D. Mejí­a Echeverrí­a, “Impresora 3D por estereolitografí­a,” Universidad Tí©cnica del Norte, 2018.

F. Cosmi and A. Dal Maso, “A mechanical characterization of SLA 3D-printed specimens for low-budget applications,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 32, pp. 194-201, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.602.

H. Xing, B. Zou, S. Li, and X. Fu, “Study on surface quality, precision and mechanical properties of 3D printed ZrO2 ceramic components by laser scanning stereolithography,” Ceramics International, vol. 43, no. 18, pp. 16340-16347, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.007.

X. Y. Yap et al., “Mechanical properties and failure behaviour of architected alumina microlattices fabricated by stereolithography 3D printing,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 196, p. 106285, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106285.

I. Gil, “La impresión 3D y sus alcances en la arquitectura,” 2015.

R. Pandey, “Photopolymers in 3D printing applications,” 2014.

E. D. V. Niño, J. L. Endrino, H. A. E. Durí¡n, A. Dí­az-Lantada, B. Pí©rez-Gutií©rrez, and A. D. Lantada, “Caracterización microscópica de texturas superficiales fabricadas aditivamente mediante estereolitografí­a lí¡ser = Microscopy characterization of superficial textures additively manufactured by laser stereolithography = Caracterizaí£o microscópica de texturas superficiais fabricadas aditiva por estereolitografia laser,” Respuestas, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 37-47, Jul. 2016, [Online]. Available: http://oa.upm.es/55415/.

Photocentrics, “Ficha Tí©cnica BR3D-DL-CASTABLE Resinas Calcinables polí­meros 3D,” 2016. [Online]. Available: www.photocentricgroup.com.

Kudo3D Inc, “3DSR UHR Resin,” 2019. Accessed: May 08, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.kudo3d.com/resin-2/#3dsr-uhr.

Formlabs INC, “Materials Data Sheet Photopolymer Resin for Form 1+ and Form 2,” 2019.

ASTM International, “ASTM D638-14, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics,” West Conshohocken, PA, 2014. doi: 10.1520/D0638-14.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).