Trusted Informer to Increase Fresh Cow Milk Consumption

Nova Sillia (1), James Hellyward (2), - Jafrinur (3), Melinda Noer (4)
(1) Faculty of Agriculture, Andalas University, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Andalas University, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Andalas University, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Agriculture, Andalas University, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Sillia, Nova, et al. “Trusted Informer to Increase Fresh Cow Milk Consumption”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 12, no. 3, May 2022, pp. 974-80, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.12.3.15551.
Trusted informer for local products such as fresh cow milk is needed to support local livestock agribusiness. Consumer trust to the informer is critical to increasing consumer knowledge and consumption. Information obtained from a trusted source has more influence the consumption. No previous research has been found that revealed the trusted informer by each consumer segment with different characterism. Consumers with different characterisms use different information sources, too. Therefore, it is crucial to reveal the trusted informer characterism to increase milk consumption. This study aims to explore the trusted informer characterism base on consumer segmentation. Data was collected by filling out the questionnaires. Consumer segmentation used K-Means Cluster analysis and descriptive analysis to analyze trusted informer characterism by each consumer segment. The result of the study found that there are three consumer segments, namely real active segment, passive segment, and hidden active segment. Trusted informer characterism by the real active segment involves formal and non-formal institutions and has good personalities and relationships with consumers. Trusted informer characterism by the passive segment has good communication skills, good knowledge and experience about fresh cow milk, and expertise in the health and education sectors. Meanwhile, the trusted informer characterism by the hidden active segment has good communication skills, has good knowledge and experience about fresh cow milk, and pleasing personalities and relationships with consumers.

M. Carrassón et al., “Information impact on consumers’ perceptions towards aquaculture: Dismantling the myth about feeds for farmed fish,” Aquaculture, vol. 544, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737137.

S. Kumar, S. Talwar, S. Krishnan, P. Kaur, and A. Dhir, “Purchasing natural personal care products in the era of fake news? The moderation effect of brand trust,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 63, no. June, p. 102668, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102668.

E. Proto and D. Sgroi, “Biased beliefs and imperfect information,” J. Econ. Behav. Organ., vol. 136, pp. 186-202, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.01.020.

D. Fischer, J. Reinermann, G. Guillen, C. T. Desroches, S. Diddi, and P. J. Vergragt, “Sustainable consumption communication : A review of an emerging fi eld of research,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 300, p. 126880, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126880.

M. P. Hakim, L. D. A. Zanetta, J. M. de Oliveira, and D. T. da Cunha, “The mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods in Brazil: Consumer’s knowledge, trust, and risk perception,” Food Res. Int., vol. 132, no. September 2019, p. 109053, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109053.

A. Vainio, “How consumers of meat-based and plant-based diets attend to scienti fi c and commercial information sources : Eating motives , the need for cognition and ability to evaluate information,” Appetite, vol. 138, no. March, pp. 72-79, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.017.

D. Borda, O. A. Mihalache, L. DumitraÅŸcu, D. GafiÈ›ianu, and A. I. Nicolau, “Romanian consumers’ food safety knowledge, awareness on certified labelled food and trust in information sources,” Food Control, vol. 120, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107544.

Y. Jarrar, A. O. Awobamise, and A. A. Aderibigbe, “Effectiveness of influencer marketing vs social media sponsored advertising,” Utop. y Prax. Latinoam., vol. 25, no. Extra12, pp. 40-54, 2020, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4280084.

A. Pramestiara and R. Rahab, “The Effect of Electronic Word-of-Mouth in Social Media toward Consumer Purchase Decision with Brand Image as Moderating Variable,” J. Res. Manag., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-6, 2018, doi: 10.32424/jorim.v1i1.14.

M. Flavi, D. Belanche, L. V Casal, and S. Ib, “Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Building influencers ’ credibility on Instagram : Effects on followers ’ attitudes and behavioral responses toward the influencer,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 61, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102585.

M. S. Thomas and Y. Feng, “Consumer risk perception and trusted sources of food safety information during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Food Control, vol. 130, no. June, p. 108279, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108279.

V. Buskens, “Spreading information and developing trust in social networks to accelerate diffusion of innovations,” Trends Food Sci. Technol., vol. 106, no. October, pp. 485-488, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.10.040.

S. H. Lee and H. Ro, “The impact of online reviews on attitude changes: The differential effects of review attributes and consumer knowledge,” Int. J. Hosp. Manag., vol. 56, pp. 1-9, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.04.004.

C. D. D. Rupprecht, L. Fujiyoshi, S. R. McGreevy, and I. Tayasu, “Trust me? Consumer trust in expert information on food product labels,” Food Chem. Toxicol., vol. 137, no. September 2019, p. 111170, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111170.

A. C. Berge and T. Baars, “Raw milk producers with high levels of hygiene and safety,” Epidemiol. Infect., pp. 1-7, 2020, doi: 10.1017/S0950268820000060.

S. Nyokabi et al., “Milk quality and hygiene: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of smallholder dairy farmers in central Kenya,” Food Control, vol. 130, no. June, p. 108303, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108303.

J. M. Tricarico, E. Kebreab, and M. A. Wattiaux, “MILK Symposium review: Sustainability of dairy production and consumption in low-income countries with emphasis on productivity and environmental impact,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 103, no. 11, pp. 9791-9802, 2020, doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18269.

M. C. D. Verain, S. J. Sijtsema, D. Taufik, I. Raaijmakers, and M. J. Reinders, “Motive-based consumer segments and their fruit and vegetable consumption in several contexts,” Food Res. Int., vol. 127, no. October 2019, p. 108731, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108731.

S. Å»akowska-Biemans et al., “Beef consumer segment profiles based on information source usage in Poland,” Meat Science, vol. 124. pp. 105-113, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.11.001.

A. Funk, B. Sí¼tterlin, and M. Siegrist, “Consumer segmentation based on Stated environmentally-friendly behavior in the food domain,” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 25, pp. 173-186, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.08.010.

A. C. Grasso, Y. Hung, M. R. Olthof, I. A. Brouwer, and W. Verbeke, “Understanding meat consumption in later life: A segmentation of older consumers in the EU,” Food Qual. Prefer., p. 104242, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104242.

S. Li, Y. Wang, G. M. L. Tacken, Y. Liu, and S. J. Sijtsema, “Consumer trust in the dairy value chain in China: The role of trustworthiness, the melamine scandal, and the media,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 104, no. 8, pp. 8554-8567, 2021, doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19733.

I. Levy, K. Cohen-louck, and H. Bonny-noach, “Gender , employment , and continuous pandemic as predictors of alcohol and drug consumption during the COVID-19,” Drug Alcohol Depend., vol. 228, no. September, p. 109029, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109029.

S. R. Jaeger, S. L. Chheang, and G. Ares, “Text highlighting as a new way of measuring consumers’ attitudes: A case study on vertical farming,” Food Qual. Prefer., vol. 95, no. April 2021, p. 104356, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104356.

C. Zhu, R. Su, X. Zhang, and Y. Liu, “Heliyon Relation between narcissism and meaning in life : the role of conspicuous consumption,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. August, p. e07885, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07885.

V. Ferreira, E. Papaoikonomou, and A. Tercen, “ScienceDirect Unpeel the layers of trust ! A comparative analysis of crowdfunding.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).