DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.1.16565

Modeling of Strategic Alignment to Modify TOGAF Architecture Development Method Based on Business Strategy Model

Yoppy Mirza Maulana (1), Zafril Rizal M Azmi (2), Ruzaini Abdullah Arshah (3)
(1) Department of Information System, Universitas Dinamika, Raya Kedung Baruk 98, Surabaya, 60298, Indonesia
(2) Department of Computing, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, 26660, Malaysia
(3) Department of Computing, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, 26660, Malaysia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Maulana, Yoppy Mirza, et al. “Modeling of Strategic Alignment to Modify TOGAF Architecture Development Method Based on Business Strategy Model”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, Feb. 2023, pp. 180-5, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.13.1.16565.
Citation Format :
Strategic alignment is generally seen as an important driver for optimizing business performance. Strategic alignment is aligning internal resource capabilities and external opportunities for superior performance. To realize the suitability of Business and IT strategies, a framework is needed, namely Enterprise Architecture (EA). One of the frameworks for EA is The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF). TOGAF is a method for developing and managing the Enterprise Architecture life cycle called Architectural Development Method (ADM). This ADM integrates elements of the TOGAF standard in responding to the organization's business, and IT needs. In this paper, researchers will contribute to formulating a strategic alignment model to modify the existing strategic alignment in TOGAF ADM based on the business strategy model. In this business model strategy, there are two things: the analysis of business strategy choices and the Balanced Score Card (BSC) strategy map. Analysis of business strategy choices uses SWOT analysis as a business strategy determination based on internal and external business environment analysis. Second, the BSC strategy map is a process of mapping business strategies into the BSC strategy map, which includes four perspectives: financial, customer, internal business processes, and learning and growth perspectives. This model was tested at the Universitas Dinamika, and the results have a good alignment rate of 95%. For further research, this model can be tested in various organizations, such as universities and public and private organizations.

S. Q. Njanka, G. Sandula, and R. Colomo-Palacios, “IT-Business alignment: A systematic literature review,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 181, no. 2020, pp. 333-340, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.154.

M. Zhang, H. Chen, and A. Luo, “A Systematic Review of Business-IT Alignment Research With Enterprise Architecture,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 18933-18944, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2819185.

C. H. Primasari, “Strategy for achieving IT-business alignment in gaming industry in Indonesia,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 197, no. 2021, pp. 469-476, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.163.

F. Macií¡ Pí©rez, J. V. Berna Martinez, and I. Lorenzo Fonseca, “Strategic IT alignment Projects. Towards Good Governance,” Comput. Stand. Interfaces, vol. 76, no. October 2020, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.csi.2021.103514.

K. Hiekkanen, M. Helenius, J. J. Korhonen, and E. Patricio, “Aligning Alignment with Strategic Context”¯: A Literature Review,” Springer, Berlin, Heidelb., vol. 205, 2013, doi: doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37317-6_8.

A. Alwadain, “How enterprise architecture creates business value: A theoretical model,” 2019 Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. ICACSIS 2019, pp. 319-324, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICACSIS47736.2019.8979818.

L. Menglong, Y. Shuanghui, Z. Mengmeng, C. Tao, C. Honghui, and Z. Xiaoxue, “A coevolutionary framework of business-IT alignment via the lens of enterprise architecture,” J. Syst. Eng. Electron., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 983-995, 2020, doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2020.000073.

B. Yoon et al., “A Study on EA based IT Governance,” Int. Conf. Adv. Commun. Technol. ICACT, vol. 2019-Febru, pp. 686-691, 2019, doi: 10.23919/ICACT.2019.8701962.

D. Dumitriu and M. A. M. Popescu, “Enterprise architecture framework design in IT management,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 46, pp. 932-940, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.011.

Y. Gong and M. Janssen, “The value of and myths about enterprise architecture,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 46, no. July 2017, pp. 1-9, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.006.

E. Kornyshova and J. Barrios, “Industry 4.0 impact propagation on enterprise architecture models,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 176, pp. 2497-2506, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.326.

A. S. Girsang and A. Abimanyu, “Adm togaf,” vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 305-321, 2021.

M. L. Pasiak and A. W. Rahardjo Emanuel, “Enterprise Architecture Planning (EAP) Using TOGAF-ADM at Fuel Supplier,” Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. Syst., pp. 73-77, 2021, doi: 10.1109/icts52701.2021.9608396.

D. Goní§alves, L. Ferreira, and N. Campos, “Enterprise architecture for high flexible and agile company in automotive industry,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 181, no. 2019, pp. 1077-1082, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.303.

The Open Group, “The TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2,” Open Gr., p. 504, 2018.

K. V. de Oliveira, E. C. Fernandes, and M. Borsato, “A TOGAF-based Framework for the Development of Sustainable Product-Service Systems,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 55, pp. 274-281, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.039.

B. D. Rouhani, M. N. ri Mahrin, F. Nikpay, and P. Nikfard, “A comparison enterprise architecture implementation methodologies,” Proc. - 2013 Int. Conf. Informatics Creat. Multimedia, ICICM 2013, pp. 1-6, 2013, doi: 10.1109/ICICM.2013.9.

F. Kitsios and M. Kamariotou, “Business strategy modelling based on enterprise architecture: a state of the art review,” Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 606-624, 2019, doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-05-2017-0122.

M. de F. Vieira Crespo, J. M. A. Gomes, and R. Oliveira da Silva, “Value chain of the mangrove crab (Ucides cordatus): A case study of the Parnaí­ba Delta, Northeast Brazil,” Mar. Policy, vol. 131, no. June, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104642.

E. Battisti, N. Nirino, E. Leonidou, and A. Thrassou, “Corporate venture capital and CSR performance: An extended resource based view’s perspective,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 139, no. October 2021, pp. 1058-1066, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.054.

H. Sukarman, F. Fitri, and A. Christiany, “Application model of small-scale hotel room rates prediction in south jakarta using business analytics,” Proc. 2021 Int. Conf. Inf. Manag. Technol. ICIMTech 2021, no. August, pp. 526-530, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ICIMTech53080.2021.9535063.

L. C. Cheng, K. Chen, M. C. Lee, and K. M. Li, “User-Defined SWOT analysis - A change mining perspective on user-generated content,” Inf. Process. Manag., vol. 58, no. 5, p. 102613, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102613.

C. H. Yang and K. C. Lee, “Developing a strategy map for forensic accounting with fraud risk management: An integrated balanced scorecard-based decision model,” Eval. Program Plann., vol. 80, no. December 2019, p. 101780, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101780.

N. A. A. Bakar, S. Harihodin, and N. Kama, “A Systematic Review of Enterprise Architecture Assessment Models,” Appl. Mech. Mater., vol. 735, no. February 2018, pp. 339-343, 2015, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.735.339.

A. Vasconcelos, C. M. Pereira, P. Sousa, and J. Tribolet, “Open issues on information system architecture research domain: The vision,” ICEIS 2004 - Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. Enterp. Inf. Syst., no. January, pp. 273-282, 2004, doi: 10.5220/0002640702730282.

A. A. GEBAYEW, Chernet; ARMAN, “Modify TOGAF ADM for Government Enterprise Architecture,” 2019 IEEE 5th Int. Conf. Wirel. Telemat., 2019.

A. Guntara, A. Saeppani, I. Fadil, and F. Supriadi, “Enterprise Information System Planning Using TOGAF Architecture Development Method on XYZ College,” 2020 8th Int. Conf. Cyber IT Serv. Manag. CITSM 2020, 2020, doi: 10.1109/CITSM50537.2020.9268798.

I. Rerung, R. R., Wahvuni, A., & Susrini, “Blueprint of Smart Campus System Using TOGAF ADM,” 2020 6th Int. Conf. Comput. Eng. Des., p. (pp. 1-5), 2020.

Y. U. Chandra and S. Harso Supangkat, “Smart Community Model using TOGAF to Help Higher Education Students on Internship Program,” 7th Int. Conf. ICT Smart Soc. AIoT Smart Soc. ICISS 2020 - Proceeding, pp. 1-6, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ICISS50791.2020.9307551.

Inayatulloh, “Proposed IT Governance for Hospital Based on TOGAF Framework,” Int. Conf. Inf. Manag. Technol., no. August, pp. 476-480, 2021.

E. Kornyshova and J. Barrios, “Process-oriented knowledge representation of the requirement management phase of TOGAF-ADM: An empirical evaluation,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 192, pp. 2239-2248, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.237.

N. Anggraini, Binariswanto, and N. Legowo, “Cloud computing adoption strategic planning using ROCCA and TOGAF 9.2: A study in government agency,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 161, pp. 1316-1324, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.247.

Y. Osadhani, A. Maulana, D. Rizkiputra, E. R. Kaburuan, and Sfenrianto, “Enterprise Architectural Design Based on Cloud Computing using TOGAF (Case Study: PT. TELIN),” ICSECC 2019 - Int. Conf. Sustain. Eng. Creat. Comput. New Idea, New Innov. Proc., pp. 111-115, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICSECC.2019.8907072.

J. A. Camatti, G. M. Rabelo, M. Borsato, and M. Pellicciari, “Comparative study of open IoT architectures with TOGAF for industry implementation,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 51, pp. 1132-1137, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.159.

D. Utomo, Suzanna, and M. Wijaya, “Tailoring TOGAF architectural development method to cloud adoption strategy,” Proc. 2020 Int. Conf. Inf. Manag. Technol. ICIMTech 2020, no. August, pp. 159-164, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ICIMTech50083.2020.9211164.

D. Utomo, Suzanna, and M. Wijaya, “Applying TOGAF-based cloud adoption framework,” Proc. 2021 Int. Conf. Inf. Manag. Technol. ICIMTech 2021, no. August, pp. 314-319, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ICIMTech53080.2021.9534965.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).