DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.1.16751

Environmental Impact Assessment in the Synthesis of Antistatic Bionanocomposite Compared with the Synthesis of Polypropylene

Muhammad Syukur Sarfat (1), Dwi Setyaningsih (2), Farah Fahma (3), Nastiti Siswi Indrasti (4), - Sudirman (5)
(1) Department of Agroindustrial Engineering, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia
(2) Surfactan and Bioenergy Reasearch Center, IPB University, Bogor, 16144, Indonesia
(3) Department of Agroindustrial Engineering, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia
(4) Department of Agroindustrial Engineering, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia
(5) National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia, Puspitek, Serpong, 15314, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Sarfat, Muhammad Syukur, et al. “Environmental Impact Assessment in the Synthesis of Antistatic Bionanocomposite Compared With the Synthesis of Polypropylene”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, Feb. 2023, pp. 117-23, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.13.1.16751.
Citation Format :
This study aims to identify the environmental impact in the synthesis of antistatic bionanocomposites compared to polypropylene synthesis. It is done using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method with SimaPro 9.1.1 software. The results showed that using 2% of M-DAG and 2.5% of CNC in the synthesis of antistatic bionanocomposites can reduce the environmental impact compared with the synthesis of PP. This is indicated by the decline in the impact value per impact categories, namely 4.46% of ADP, 3.70% of ADP-FF, 4.21% of GWP, 4.48% of ODP, 4.63% of HTP, 5.10% of FWAEP, 4.84% of MAEP, 2021% of TEP, 4.08% of POP, 4.41% of AP, and 4.85% of EP. After normalization of the impact category, the total environmental impact per function unit in antistatic bionancomposite synthesis is smaller than PP synthesis, with a percentage reduction of the environmental impact of 4.58%. The efficient use of energy and natural resources is considered necessary to reduce the environmental impact per kg of antistatic bionanocomposite pellets. The higher percentage of reduced by products, the lower total environmental impact per kg of antistatic bionanocomposite pellets. The application of reuse, reduce, and recycle methods on co-products from antistatic bio-nanocomposite synthesis needs to be done because it positively impacts the environment. Further research needs to be carried out to identify environmental impacts in synthesizing antistatic bionanocomposites in a wider scope of the study, namely cradle to grave, if possible.

S. Salsabila, D. Setyaningsih, Q. R. Jannah, and N. Muna, “Formulation of mono-diacylglycerol from palm fatty acid distillate and glycerol as antistatic agents on plastics,” 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/749/1/012069.

F. N. N. M. Hussin, R. A. Wahab, and N. Attan, “Nanocellulose and nanoclay as reinforcement materials in polymer composites: A review,” Malaysian J. Fundam. Appl. Sci., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 145-153, 2020, doi: 10.11113/mjfas.v16n2.1430.

G. da S. Maradini et al., “Characterization of polyester nanocomposites reinforced with conifer fiber cellulose nanocrystals,” Polymers (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 12, p. 2838, 2020, doi: 10.3390/polym12122838.

C. Miao and W. Y. Hamad, “Critical insights into the reinforcement potential of cellulose nanocrystals in polymer nanocomposites,” Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., vol. 23, no. 4, p. 100761, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.cossms.2019.06.005.

T. Sunny and K. L. Pickering, “Cellulose nanocrystal treatment of aligned short hemp fibre mats for reinforcement in polypropylene matrix composites,” Cellulose, vol. 28, pp. 8429-8444, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10570-021-04091-3.

J. Shojaeiarani, D. S. Bajwa, and S. Chanda, “Cellulose nanocrystal based composites: A review,” Composites Part C: Open Access. p. 100164, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100164.

Y. Liu, S. Zhang, X. Wang, Y. Pan, F. Zhang, and J. Huang, “Mechanical and aging resistance properties of polypropylene (PP) reinforced with nanocellulose/attapulgite composites (NCC/AT),” Compos. Interfaces, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 73-85, 2020, doi: 10.1080/09276440.2019.1600971.

R. A. Jibhakate, N. W. Nirwan, and K. S. Rambhad, “Enhancing the effectiveness of green technology in manufacturing industry,” in Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, pp. 4298-4305, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.592.

P. S. Goh and A. F. Ismail, “Nanocomposites for environmental and energy applications,” Nanomaterials. p. 156, 2021, doi: 10.3390/nano11020345.

J. Pryshlakivsky and C. Searcy, “Life Cycle Assessment as a decision-making tool: Practitioner and managerial considerations,” Journal of Cleaner Production. p. 127344, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127344.

S. A. Abbasi, A. Busnaina, and J. A. Isaacs, “Cumulative energy demand for printing nanoscale electronics,” in Procedia CIRP, 2019, pp. 298-303, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.12.018.

E. H. Szafranko, “Selected problems of the environmental impact analysis of investment projects based on life cycle assessment procedure,” J. Ecol. Eng., vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 87-94, 2019, doi: 10.12911/22998993/112504.

B. Agarski, D. Vukelic, M. I. Micunovic, and I. Budak, “Evaluation of the environmental impact of plastic cap production, packaging, and disposal,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 245, pp. 55-65, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.078.

F. Marendra, A. Rahmada, A. Prasetya, R. B. Cahyono, and T. Ariyanto, “Kajian Dampak Lingkungan pada Sistem Produksi Listrik dari Limbah Buah Menggunakan Life Cycle Assessment,” J. Rekayasa Proses, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 27-39, 2018, doi: 10.22146/jrekpros.36425.

G. Atiwesh, A. Mikhael, C. C. Parrish, J. Banoub, and T.-A. T. Le, “Environmental impact of bioplastic use: A review,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 9, p. e07918, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07918.

J. Gasparotto and K. Da Boit Martinello, “Coal as an energy source and its impacts on human health,” Energy Geosci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 113-120, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.engeos.2020.07.003.

G. Mert, B. S. Linke, and J. C. Aurich, “Analysing the Cumulative Energy Demand of Product-service Systems for wind Turbines,” in Procedia CIRP, 2017, pp. 214-219, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.09.018.

N. V. Rudenko, V. V. Ershov, and V. V. Evstafiev, “The Environment Friendly Power Source for Power Supply of Mobile Communication Base Stations,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2017, p. 012024, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/66/1/012024.

P. Purwanto, “Cleaner Production And Waste Minimization,” in Global Classroom Solid and Scheduled Waste Management; Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology; Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 2021, pp. 1-47, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33609.16486.

J. Zhang et al., “Understanding the impact of environmental regulations on green technology innovation efficiency in the construction industry,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 65, p. 102647, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102647.

A. Gonzalez-Garay and G. Guillen-Gosalbez, “Framework for the optimal design of sustainable processes incorporating data envelopment analysis,” in Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 2018, pp. 1711-1716.

B. ZegardÅ‚o, “Comparative Assessment of Environmental Effects by LCA Method of Natural Aggregates Extraction Processes and Production of Their Substitutes from Waste in the City Mining System,” J. Ecol. Eng., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 251-257, 2021, doi: 10.12911/22998993/139119.

L. F. C. Silva, M. E. Silva, I. Brí¡s, I. Domingos, D. Wessel, and J. V. Ferreira, “A Cradle-to-Grave Life Cycle Assessment Study on a New Countertop Material,” J. Ecol. Eng., vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 239-245, 2021, doi: 10.12911/22998993/142947.

J. Harasymiuk, “Environmental impact assessments in investment process-legal and methodological aspects,” J. Ecol. Eng., vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 79-87, 2019, doi: 10.12911/22998993/112857.

A. Harat and A. JaguÅ›, “Procedure for the Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment of Contemplated Investment Projects in the Polish Legal System,” J. Ecol. Eng., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 285-291, 2020, doi: 10.12911/22998993/126881.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).