Student Performance Based on Activity Log on Social Network and e-Learning

- Agusriandi (1), Imas Sukaesih Sitanggang (2), Sony Hartono Wijaya (3)
(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Enrekang, Enrekang, South Sulawesi, 91711, Indonesia
(2) Computer Science Department, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia
(3) Computer Science Department, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Agusriandi, -, et al. “Student Performance Based on Activity Log on Social Network and E-Learning”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 10, no. 6, Dec. 2020, pp. 2276-81, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.10.6.8753.
Learning activities in social networks and e-learning platforms bring massive activity log in the database, making it challenging to measure students’ performance. Data mining technique and social network analysis provide some benefits in the field of education in discovering knowledge from hidden information of student’s activities on e-learning and social network environment. This study aims to identify dominant students on social network group based on centrality values and to analyze log data from the activities on e-learning using process mining technique. Centrality value was measured by analyzing data quality or data pre-processing, creating the network, measuring the network, and highlighting degrees and layouts. The process mining technique included data pre-processing, discovering process, and conformance checking. This study found that dominant students were identified from a high hub score and authority. This study also found a free-rider student. The presence of dominant students and free-riders made the collaboration of social network group are weak. This study also found that student performance on e-learning has been discovered where the student’s activity, namely, the course module viewed and course viewed, were more frequent than other activities. On the other hand, an optimum fitness value was obtained, i.e., 0.94 on all the processes of e-learning. This study provides insights that can be used to improve student collaboration and to enhance online learning activities.

PISA. (2015) Programme for International Student Assessment, “Pisa Results in Focus,” PISA. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf.

A. Mueen, B. Zafar, dan U. Manzoor, “Modeling and Predicting Students’ Academic Performance Using Data Mining Techniques,” Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 36-42, Nov. 2016.

M. Ciolacu, A. F. Tehrani, R. Beer, dan H. Popp, “Education 4.0—Fostering student’s performance with machine learning methods,” in 2017 IEEE 23rd International Symposium for Design and Technology in Electronic Packaging (SIITME), 2017, pp. 438-443.

Y. Kim, “The Framework of Cloud e-Learning System for Strengthening ICT Competence of Teachers in Nicaragua,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 8, pp. 62-67, Feb. 2018.

F. H. Wang, “An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system,” Comput. Educ., vol. 114, no.1 pp. 79-91, 2017.

A. Krouska, C. Troussas, dan M. Virvou, “SN ” Learning: An exploratory study beyond e ” learning and evaluation of its applications using EV ” SNL framework,” J Comput Assist Learn, vol. 35, no.1 pp. 168-177, Oct. 2018.

A. Singh, “Mining of Social Media data of University students,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1515-1526, 2017.

J.-H. Lam dan W. W. K. Ma, “When and how does learning satisfy? Working collaboratively online with a clear purpose,” Int. J. Innov. Learn., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 400-415, 2018.

A. E. E. Sobaih, M. A. Moustafa, P. Ghandforoush, dan M. Khan, “To use or not to use? Social media in higher education in developing countries,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 58, pp. 296-305, 2016.

A. Bogarin, R. Cerezo, dan C. Romero, “Discovering learning processes using Inductive Miner: A case study with Learning Management Systems (LMSs),” Psicothema, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 322-329, 2018.

N. F. Kolan, N. Jailani, M. Abu Bakar, dan R. Latih, “Trust Model Based on Islamic Business Ethics and Social Network Analysis,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 2323, 2018.

P. M. T. Crespo, “Social networks exploration for educational data mining,” Instituto Superior Tí©cnico, Lisboa (PT), 2013.

F. Elghibari, R. Elouahbi, dan F. El Khoukhi, “Data Mining for Detecting E-learning Courses Anomalies: An Application of Decision Tree Algorithm,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 980, 2018.

I. Yurek, D. Birant, dan K. U. Birant, “Interactive process miner: a new approach for process mining,” Turk J Elec Eng Comp Sci, vol. 26, pp. 1314-1328, 2018.

J. G. Rigby, “Principals’ conceptions of instructional leadership and their informal social networks: An exploration of the mechanisms of the mesolevel,” Am. J. Educ., vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 433-464, 2016.

S. Ahajjam, M. El Haddad, dan H. Badir, “A new scalable leader-community detection approach for community detection in social networks,” Soc. Networks, vol. 54, hal. 41-49, 2018.

E. Rojas, J. Munoz-Gama, M. Sepíºlveda, dan D. Capurro, “Process mining in healthcare: A literature review.,” J. Biomed. Inform., vol. 61, pp. 224-36, 2016.

A. Bogarí­n, R. Cerezo, dan C. Romero, “Discovering learning processes using inductive miner: A case study with learning management systems (LMSs),” Psicothema, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 322-329, 2018.

J. Munoz-gama, Conformance Checking and Diagnosis in Process Mining, Comparing Observed and Modeled Processes, 1 ed. Chile: Springer, 2016.

K. L. Vogt, “Measuring Student Engagement Using Learning Management Systems,” University of Toronto, Toronto (CA), 2016.

A. Brodsky, G. Shao, M. Krishnamoorthy, A. Narayanan, D. Menascí©, dan R. Ak, “Analysis and optimization based on reusable knowledge base of process performance models,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 88, no. 1-4, pp. 337-357, 2016.

J. Hagerty, “2017 Planning Guide for Data and Analytics,” Gartner, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.gartner.com/binaries/content/assets/events/keywords/catalyst/catus8/2017_planning_guide_for_data_analytics.pdf.

R. Jugulum, “Importance of Data Quality for Analytics,” in Quality in the 21st Century, Springer, 2016, pp. 23-31.

D. C. Corrales, A. Ledezma, dan J. C. Corrales, “From Theory to Practice: A Data Quality Framework for Classification Tasks,” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 10, pp. 1-29, 2018.

S.-H. Cheong dan Y.-W. Si, “Accelerating the Kamada-Kawai algorithm for boundary detection in a mobile ad hoc network,” ACM Trans. Sens. Networks, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3, 2017.

R. Conforti, M. Dumas, L. Garcí­a-Bañuelos, dan M. La Rosa, “BPMN miner: automated discovery of BPMN process models with hierarchical structure,” Inf. Syst., vol. 56, pp. 284-303, 2016.

W. M. P. Van der Aalst, Process mining: data science in action, 2 ed. London: Springer, 2016.

B. Van Dongen, J. Carmona, dan T. Chatain, “A Unified Approach for Measuring Precision and Generalization Based on Anti-alignments,” in 14th International Conference on Business Process Man- agement (BPM’16), 2016, pp. 39-56.

A. Burattin, F. M. Maggi, dan A. Sperduti, “Conformance checking based on multi-perspective declarative process models,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 65, pp. 194-211, 2016.

J. Siles-Gonzí¡lez dan C. Solano-Ruiz, “Self-assessment, reflection on practice and critical thinking in nursing students,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 45, pp. 132-137, 2016.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).