The Self-Perceived Digital Competence of Social Educators in Spain: Influence of Demographic and Professional Variables

Marcos Cabezas González (1), Sonia Casillas Martín (2), Andrea Verenice Basantes Andrade (3)
(1) Department of Didactics, Organization and Research Methods, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, 37008, Spain
(2) Department of Didactics, Organization and Research Methods, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, 37008, Spain
(3) Universidad Técnica del Norte, Network Science Research Group e-CIER, Avda. 17 de Julio, 5-21, Ibarra, 100105, Ecuador
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Cabezas González, Marcos, et al. “The Self-Perceived Digital Competence of Social Educators in Spain: Influence of Demographic and Professional Variables”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 10, no. 6, Dec. 2020, pp. 2251-60, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.10.6.9246.
In 21st-century society, Information and Communication Technologies establish the ways of communication and socialization. The way we live, study, work, entertain ourselves, etc. have changed, and the patterns of social and economic development demand new skills from citizens. In Spain, the scientific and professional career called Social Education and their social educators, are responsible for promoting and facilitating the adaptation of people to society. Nowadays, these professionals must be aware that one of the fundamental competencies, along with others, is digital competence, and its development is a requirement to agree with contemporary society. This article presents the findings of a research that aims to be a pioneer in the field of study of Social Education in Spain and whose objective is to analyze the self-perceived digital competence of 452 working social educators and determine if demographic variables and professionals influence it. A quantitative, non-experimental, and descriptive method was used, with an ex-post-facto methodology, of a descriptive type in which no kind of treatment was applied to the object of study. The electronic survey technique was used to collect the information. For the analysis of the data, descriptive, inferential and regression tests were carried out. The main results obtained allow us to conclude that neither gender, nor age, nor the Autonomous Community influence the dimensions of management and attitude towards Information and Communication Technologies. On the contrary, professional variables do have an influence on the self-assessment of digital competence.

M. Castells, La era de la información: economí­a, sociedad y cultura. La sociedad red [The information age: economy, society, and culture. The network society]. Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial, 1997.

M. Au-Yong, R. Goní§alves, J. Martins, and F. Branco, “The social impact of technology on millennials and consequences for higher education and leadership”, Telematics and Informatics, no 35, pp. 954-963, 2018. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.007.

P. Turiman, T.S. Meriam and K. Osman, “21st Century Skills Mastery Amongst Science Foundation Programme Students”, International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering Information Technology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 46-53, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.9.1.6431.

D. West, Megachange. Economic Disruption, Political Upheaval, and Social Strife in the 21st Century. Washington, United States: Brookings Institution, 2016.

G. Lipovetsky. De la ligereza [Lightness]. Barcelona, Spain: Anagrama, 2016.

Z. Bauman, Los retos de la educación en la modernidad lí­quida [Challenges of education in liquid modernity], Barcelona, Spain: Gedisa, 2007.

C.S. Chai, L. Tan, F. Deng, and J.H.L. Koh, “Examining pre-service teachers’ design capacities for webbased 21st century new culture of learning”, Australasian Journal Education Technology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 129-142, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3013.

B.E. Sampedro, “ICT and social education in the twenty - first century”, Edmetic, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8-24, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v5i1.4014.

S. Carretero, R. Vuorikari, and Y. Punie, DigComp 2.1. The digital competence framework for citizens. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017.

A. Ibí¡ñez, A. Kortabitarte, P. De Castro, and I. Gillate, “Digital competence using heritage theme apps in the DigComp framework”, Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 13-27, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.22.1.356231.

P. Sí¡nchez, C.A. Viloria, and J.P. Labra, “The role of the family in the development of digital competence. Analysis of four cases”, Digital Education Review, no. 34, pp. 44-58, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.raco.cat/index.php/DER/article/view/348340.

N. Torres, T. Pessoa, and M.J. Gallego, “Intervention and e-assessment with technologies of the competence in digital security”, Digital Education Review, no. 35, pp. 111-129, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/27399/pdf.

L. Gilbert, “Assassin’s Creed reminds us that history is human experience: Students’ senses of empathy while playing a narrative video game”, Theory & Research in Social Education, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 108-137, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2018.1560713.

H.J. Kim, A.J. Hong, and H.D. Song, “The relationships of family, perceived digital competence and attitude, and learning agility in sustainable student engagement in higher education”, Sustainability, no. 10, 1-16, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124635.

O.J. Lindberg, A.D. Olofsson, and G. Fransson, “Same but different? An examination of Swedish upper secondary school teachers’ and students’ views and use of ICT in education”, International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 122-132, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-09-2016-0043.

R. Lorenz, M. Endberg, and W. Bos, “Predictors of fostering students’ computer and information literacy-analysis based on a representative sample of secondary school teachers in Germany”, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 911-928, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9809-0.

E. Rolf, O. Knutsson, and R. Ramberg, “An analysis of digital competence as expressed in design patterns for technology use in teaching”, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1-15, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12739.

A. Shala and A. Grajcevci, “Digital competencies among student populations in Kosovo: the impact of inclusion, socioeconomic status, ethnicity and type of residence”, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1203-1218, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9657-3.

F. Siddiq and R. Scherer, “Is there a gender gap? A meta-analysis of the gender differences in students’ ICT literacy”, Educational Research Review, pp. 205-217, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.007.

S. ZakrajÅ¡ek, “Possible education models for acquiring digital competence of students”, Didactica Slovenica, vol. 33, no. 3-4, pp. 94-106, 2018.

M. Cabezas-Gonzí¡lez and S. Casillas-Martí­n, “Are Future Social Educators Digital Residents?”, REDIE, Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 61-72, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2017.19.4.1369.

M. Cabezas-Gonzí¡lez and S. Casillas-Martí­n, “Social Educators: A study of digital competence from a gender differences perspective”, Croatian Journal of Education, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 11-42, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v20i1.2632.

L. Gulova and S. Strelec, “Social Education and Social Work as an Inspirational Resource of Teacher Training”, Czech-polish historical and pedagogical Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 21-30, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5817/cphpj-2017-0010.

CGCEES, Documentos profesionalizadores [Professionalising documents]. Barcelona, Spain: ASEDES, 2007. [Online]. Available: http://www.eduso.net/archivo/docdow.php?id=143.

E. Ví¡zquez Cano, E. Ferní¡ndez Mí¡rquez, and E. López Meneses, “The professional of Social Education and the mediating competence in the field of the elderly people”, RELATEC, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 205-222, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.16.2.205.

M. Castro, J. Fullana, and M. Pallisera, “La inserción laboral de los Diplomados en Educación Social. Aní¡lisis de las caracterí­sticas de los procesos de inserción y reconcomiendo profesional” [The labour insertion of the Graduates in Social Education. Analysis of the characteristics of the processes of insertion and professional recognition], Bordón, no. 59, pp. 565-580, 2008.

J.A. Pí©rez, Educación Social y Tecnologí­as de la Información y la Comunicación: impactos y retos. Reflexiones de un educador TIC [Social Education and Information and Communication Technologies: impacts and challenges. Reflexions of an ICT educator], Revista de Educación Social, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.eduso.net/res/?b=14&c=129&n=375.

M.J. Roblizo and R. Cózar, “ICT skills and uses of would be Primary and Pre-School teachers: Towards areal technological literacy for educators”, Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, no. 47, pp. 23-39, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2015.i47.02.

P. Kampylis, Y. Punie, and J. Devine, Promoting effective learning in the digital age. A European Framework for Digitally Competent Educational Organisations. European Union, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.2791/54070.

D. Mioduser, R. Nachmias, and A. Forkosh-Baruch, “New literacies for the knowledge society”, In J. Voogt and G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education, pp. 23-42, New York, United States: Springer, 2008.

R.J. Krumsvik, “Situated learning and teachers’ digital competence”, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 279-290, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9069-5.

A. Calvani, A. Cartelli, A. Fini, and M. Ranieri, “Models and instruments for assessing digital competence at school”, Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 183-193, 2008.

D. Reig, Socionomí­a ¿Vas a perderte la revolución social? [Socionomy. Are you going to miss the social revolution?]. Barcelona, Spain: Deusto, 2012.

S. Casillas, M. Cabezas, M. Sanches-Ferreira, and F.L. Teixeira, “Psychometric Study of a Questionnaire to Measure the Digital Competence of University Students (CODIEU)”, Education in the Knowledge Society, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 69-81, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks20181936981.

A. Martí­nez, “Uso y percepción de las TIC por educadores y educadoras sociales en su tarea profesional” [Use and perception of ICTs by social educators in their professional work], Revista de Educación Social, no. 20, pp. 1-11, 2015.

G. Barrantes, L.M. Casas, and R. Luengo, “Competencias Tecnológicas de los profesores de Infantil y Primaria de Extremadura en función del gí©nero” [Technological Competences of Infant and Primary School teachers in Extremadura according to gender], Revista Iberoamericana de Informí¡tica Educativa, no. 19, pp. 33-48, 2014.

N. Law, W.J. Pelgrum, and T. Plomp, Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong, Chinese: CERC-Springer, 2008.

E. Martos, P. Pí©rez, and J. Bernal, “The relationship between the age of music teachers in Andalucí­a and the development of the IT program Escuela TIC 2.0.”, Revista Complutense de Educación, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 757-777, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2016.v27.n2.48264.

L. Amhag, L. Hellstrí¶m, and M. Stigmar, “Teacher Educators' Use of Digital Tools and Needs for Digital Competence in Higher Education”, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1-18. [Online] Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).