Identification of Micro-Earthquake Hypocenters using Geiger and Coupled Velocity-Hypocenters Methods

Widya Utama (1), Dwa Desa Warnana (2), Sherly Ardhya Garini (3)
(1) Geophysical Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Surabaya, 60111, Indonesia
(2) Geophysical Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Surabaya, 60111, Indonesia
(3) Geophysical Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Surabaya, 60111, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Utama, Widya, et al. “Identification of Micro-Earthquake Hypocenters Using Geiger and Coupled Velocity-Hypocenters Methods”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, Feb. 2021, pp. 350-5, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.11.1.10589.
The accuracy location of hypocenter is needed to determine the subsurface character beneath a geothermal area. The study used 73 micro-earthquake events; each micro-earthquake event was classified based on the time difference between the P and S waves (ts-tp) that had values ≤ 3seconds, the magnitude of micro-earthquake ≤ 3SR and each micro-earthquake event was recorded at least by 3 observer stations. We inverted selected P and S travel times from 11-unit seismic stations on X geothermal area. The initial hypocenter location was determined using Geiger method. The result of the Geiger method's initial hypocenter location was then used as the input to determine the accurate hypocenter location in the following method, Coupled Velocity-Hypocenters method. Other parameters were also used on this second method, including hypocenter location, 1-D velocity model, origin time, vp/vs ratio, zshift and the station correction. The distribution of hypocenter locations of micro-earthquakes obtained using the second method was better than the results from Geiger method. This result is supported by the Coupled Velocity-Hypocenters average RMS error value, which was smaller, only 0.19 seconds, compared to the Geiger method, which had an average RMS error of 0.74 seconds. The hypocenter location of the relocation was more clustered in the reservoir area, precisely in the production well, and in the heat source area. The hypocenter location in the production well area indicates fluid flow through the fracture from the permeable zone.

W. I. Sevilla, L. A. Jumawan, C. J. Clarito, M. A. Quintia, A. A. Dominguiano, and R. U. Solidum, “Improved 1D velocity model and deep long-period earthquakes in Kanlaon Volcano, Philippines: Implications for its magmatic system,” J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., vol. 393, p. 106793, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2020.106793.

M. Zhang, W. L. Ellsworth, and G. C. Beroza, “Rapid Earthquake Association and Location,” Seismol. Res. Lett., vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 2276-2284, 2019, doi: 10.1785/0220190052.

V. Midzi, T. Pule, B. Manzunzu, T. Mulabisana, B. S. Zulu, and S. Myendeki, “Improved earthquake location in the gold mining regions of south africa using new velocity models,” South African J. Geol., vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 35-58, 2020, doi: 10.25131/sajg.123.0008.

E. Karasí¶zen and B. Karasí¶zen, “Earthquake location methods,” GEM - Int. J. Geomathematics, vol. 11, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s13137-020-00149-9.

H. Kianimehr, E. Kissling, F. Yaminifard, and M. Tatar, “Regional minimum 1-D P-wave velocity model for a new seismicity catalogue with precise and consistent earthquake locations in southern Iran,” J. Seismol., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1529-1547, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10950-018-9783-4.

K. I. Konstantinou, “Estimation of optimum velocity model and precise earthquake locations in NE Aegean: Implications for seismotectonics and seismic hazard,” J. Geodyn., vol. 121, pp. 143-154, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2018.07.005.

I. Madrinovella, S. Widiyantoro, A. Dian, and H. Triastuty, “Studi Penentuan dan Relokasi Hiposenter Gempa Mikro Sekitar Cekungan Bandung,” J. Geofis., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 80-88, 2012.

S. A. Garini, Madlazim, and E. Rahmawati, “Relokasi Hiposenter Gempa Bumi di Sulawesi Tengah dengan menggunakan Metode Geiger dan Coupled Velocity-Hypocenter,” J. Fis., vol. 03, no. 02, pp. 107-112, 2014.

M. Liu, M. Zhang, W. Zhu, W. L. Ellsworth, and H. Li, “Rapid Characterization of the July 2019 Ridgecrest, California, Earthquake Sequence from Raw Seismic Data Using Machine-Learning Phase Picker,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 0-2, 2020, doi: 10.1029/2019GL086189.

A. Hijriani, D. P. Sahara, A. D. Nugraha, I. Ramadhan, and R. P. Sidik, “Peningkatan Akurasi Lokasi Gempa Mikro Dengan Menggunakan Metoda Double-Difference Dan Korelasi Silang Master Waveform,” J. Geofis., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 21, 2017, doi: 10.36435/jgf.v15i1.33.

K. Nishi, “Hypocenter Calculation Software GAD (Geiger’s method with Adaptive Damping),” vol. 1, no. May. pp. 1-5, 2005.

E. Kissling, Program VELEST User Guide, no. October. 1995.

N. K. T. Suandayani and S. Poniman, “Penentuan Nilai Magnitudo Gempa Vulkanik Gunung Guntur Jawa Barat berdasarkan Data Seismik,” 2017.

S. G. Halida, “Relokasi Hiposenter dan Koreksi Stasiun MEQ menggunakan Metode Coupled Velocity-Hypocenter,” Surabaya, Indonesia, 2019.

N. A. A. Siregar, “Penentuan Lokasi Hiposenter Gempa Bumi Mikromenggunakan Metode Geiger dengan Arrival Times P- Wave dan S- Wave Berdasarkan S-Transform,” Surabaya, Indonesia, 2019.

A. F. Akbar et al., “Study on Seismicity and Seismic Tomography on a Hydrothermal System in West Java,” World Geotherm. Congr. 2015, Melbourne, Aust., no. April, pp. 1-5, 2015.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).