Sensitivity Analysis of Rainfall-Runoff Model in Malino Sub-Watershed

A Arlimasita (1), U Lasminto (2)
(1) Department of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia
(2) Department of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Arlimasita, A, and U Lasminto. “Sensitivity Analysis of Rainfall-Runoff Model in Malino Sub-Watershed”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 10, no. 4, Aug. 2020, pp. 1578-83, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.10.4.12803.
Overtime, science has been developing and trying to use modelling system in the management of hydrology. In this paper, we present a sensitivity analysis for the HEC-HMS rainfall-runoff model. Sensitivity analysis is used to determine the parameter which most influences the result of the model. The main objective of this research is to investigate the sensitivity of parameter in model and to analyze the influence of the graph types used for unit hydrograph. In addition, we also compare the result of lumped and semi-distributed models based on stream order to analyse a common watershed issue. This study will make a model of rainfall-runoff using a sub-catchment distribution method based on stream order. ArcGIS and HEC-HMS were used as softwares to process data. The data needed in this study come from secondary data sourced from various sources. The data that will be processed first is DEM (Digital Elevation Model). DEM used in this study was sourced from the Geospatial Information Agency or commonly referred to as DEMNAS (The National DEM). ArcGIS will process geospatial data in the form of DEM which data results can be used directly to make model in HEC-HMS. Then, the results of the rainfall-runoff model will be calibrated using observed unit hydrograph.  From the result of sensitivity analysis, it was concluded that impervious is the most sensitive parameter. Moreover, this paper also can be used as guidelines for use in rainfall-runoff modelling on HEC-HMS.

B. Harsoyo, Review Modeling Hidrologi Das Di Indonesia, J. Sains Teknol. Modif. Cuaca, vol.11, p.41, 2010.

N A. Affandy and Anwar N, Pemodelan Hujan-Debit Menggunakan Model HEC-HMS di Das, Sampean Baru, Seminar Nasional Penanganan Kegagalan Pembangunan dan Pemeliharaan Infrastruktur, Surabaya: Teknik Sipil ITS, pp 51-60, 2011.

K. Beven, Rainfall-Runoff Modelling (England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd). 2012.

A. Asadi and F. Boustani, Performance Evaluation of the HEC-HMS Hydrologic Model for Lumped and Semi-distributed Stormflow Simulation (Study Area : Delibajak Basin) Am. J. Eng. Res. vol. 02, 115-121, 2013.

M. Baduna Koí§yiÄŸit, H. Akay, and A M. Yanmaz, Effect of Watershed Partitioning on Hydrologic Parameters and Estimation of Hydrograph of an Ungauged Basin, A Case Study in Gokirmak and Kocanaz, Turkey Arab. J. Geosci., vol. 10, 2017.

H L. Zhang , Y J, Wang, Y Q. Wang, D X. Li, and X K. Wang, The Effect of Watershed Scale on HEC-HMS Calibrated Parameters: A Case Study in The Clear Creek Watershed in Iowa, US Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. vol. 17, p. 2735-2745, 2013.

A. Ahbari, L. Stour, A. Agoum and N. Serhir, Sensitivity of the HMS Model to Various Modelling Characteristics: Case Study of Bin El Ouidane Basin (High Atlas of Morocco) Arab. J. Geosci. vol.11, 2018.

B G. Tassew, M A. Balete and K. Miegel, Application of HEC-HMS Model for Flow Simulation in the Lake Tana Basin: The Case of Gilgel Abay Catchment, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia Hydrology, vol.6 1-17, 2019.

I G. Tunas, N. Anwar and U. Lasminto, A synthetic unit hydrograph model based on fractal characteristics of watersheds, Int. J. River Basin Manag, vol.17, 465-477, 2019.

Geospatioan Information Agency, Digital Elevation Model Nation (DEMNAS), 2019.

T L. Lovell and E. Atkinson, From Slide Rules to GIS: A 35-years Evolution in Hydrologic and Hydraulic Engineering, Water Resources and Environmental History, pp 5-10, 2004.

S. Wu, J. Li and G H. Huang, Characterization and Evaluation of Elevation Data Uncertainty in Water Resources Modeling with GIS, Water Resour. Manag. vol.22, p. 959-972, 2008.

A N. Strahler, Quantitative Analysis of Watershed Geomorphology, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, vol.38, 913-920, 1957.

R H. Hawkins, T J. Ward, D E. Woodward and J A. Van Mullem, Curve Number Hydrology: State of the Practice, Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineering, 2009.

W A A. Ouí©draogo W A A, J M Raude and J M. Gathenya, Continuous Modeling of the Mkurumudzi River Catchment in Kenya Using the HEC-HMS Conceptual Model: Calibration, Validation, Model Performance Evaluation and Sensitivity Analysis Hydrology, vol.5, 44-61, 2018.

A. Wałega, A. Rutkowska and A. Policht-Latawiec, Sensitivity of Beta and Weibull Synthetic Unit Hydrographs to Input Parameter Changes, Polish J. Environ. Stud., vol.23 221-229, 2014.

B. Scharffenberg B, M. Bartles, T. Braurer, M. Fleming and G. Karlovits, Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS User’s Manual, Washington, DC: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center, 2018.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).