DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.4.12820

Improvement of Trip Attraction Model in Surabaya by Considering Geographical Weighting of City Centre Activity Function

W Herijanto (1), I B Mochtar (2), A Wicaksono (3)
(1) Department of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, 60111, Indonesia
(2) Department of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, 60111, Indonesia
(3) Department of Civil Engineering, Brawijaya University, Malang, 65145, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Herijanto, W, et al. “Improvement of Trip Attraction Model in Surabaya by Considering Geographical Weighting of City Centre Activity Function”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 10, no. 4, Aug. 2020, pp. 1591-6, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.10.4.12820.
Citation Format :
It is challenging to have a trip attraction model that fits Surabaya's surveyed data due to unclear city centre structure. These include the centrum of concentric, corridors of sectoral, or several centres of multiple-nuclei structures. Also, the layout of residential areas has unconventional patterns. This is because the planned housing development area is wrongly inserted on kampong and sometimes lies in city centre. This paper examines the influence of single-centre districts, corridors, or multiple suburb centre structures on trip attraction. The analysis was conducted using origin-destination data from the household interview survey by The Transportation Board of Surabaya and several houses digitized from a relevant year's satellite image. The distance and position information was taken from the Google Earth application. The zonal analysis trip attraction model based on the sub-district zoning system was analysed using fixed trip production data and simulated independent variables. The independent variables included the zonal activity areas such as shops, offices, and industries in sub-district, while the dependent variables consisted of the straight distances from the sub-district to city centres. Several models were tested based on the dependent and independent variables. The results show that the combined zonal activity area and spatial variables have a stronger influence on zonal trip attraction than the conventional model using zonal labor and student variable, mainly based on the urban geographical pattern.

P. R. Stopher, and A. H. Meyburg, “Urban Transportation Modelling and Planning”, Lexington Book, D.C. Heath and Company, 1975. Available: https://trid.trb.org/view/61685

J. W. Dickey, W. J. Diewald, A. G. Hobeika, C. J. Hurst, N. T. Stephens, R. C. Stuart, and R. G. Walker, Metropolitan Transportation Planning. Taylor & Francis, 1983.

https://www.google.com/intl/id/earth/versions/#earth-pro

PG. Forecasting Trip Attraction Based On Commercial Land Use Characteristics. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology. eSAT Publishing House; 2013 Sep 25;02(09):471-9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2013.0209072

Arliansyah J, Hartono Y. Trip Attraction Model Using Radial Basis Function Neural Networks. Procedia Engineering. Elsevier BV; 2015;125:445-51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.117

Google earth V 7.3.3.7699. (May 7, 2020). Indonesia, 1° 24’ 34.16” S, 119° 29’ 03.44” E, Eye alt 4493.76 km. Image Landsat / Copernicus © 2020 Google, US Dept os Ftate Geographer, Data SIO, NOAA, U.S. Navy. NGA. GEBCO. Available: http://www.earth.google.com [December, 14, 2015].

Google earth V 7.3.3.7699. (May 7, 2020). Surabaya, Indonesia, 7° 17’ 01.78” S, 112° 44’ 56.67” E, Eye alt 33.91 km. Image © 2020 Terrametrics, © 2020 Google, Image © 2020 Maxar Technologies Data SIO, NOAA, U.S. Navy. NGA. GEBCO. Available: http://www.earth.google.com [April, 9, 2020].

Soemardiono B, Rachmawati M, Ardianta DA, Nugroho S. Spatial Analysis of Urban Dense Area in Developing Criteria Design Based on People Participation: A Case Study of Kembang Jepun, Surabaya. Geographia Technica. Asociatia Geograhia Technica; 2019 Mar 29;14(special):13-21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.21163/gt_2019.141.14

Ní¦ss P, Strand A, Wolday F, Stefansdottir H. Residential location, commuting and non-work travel in two urban areas of different size and with different center structures. Progress in Planning. Elsevier BV; 2019 Feb;128:1-36. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2017.10.002

Dinas Perhubungan Kota Surabaya, “Studi Pengembangan Model Transportasi di Kota Surabaya”, Laporan Akhir, 2011.

R. E. Park, and E. W. Burgess, The City, University of Chicago Press pp. 47-62, 1925. ISBN 9780226148199.

H. Hoyt, The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American Cities, Washington, Federal Housing Administration, 1939.

Harris CD, Ullman EL. The Nature of Cities. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. SAGE Publications; 1945 Nov;242(1):7-17. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000271624524200103

Sefrus T, Priyanto S, Parikesit D, Dewanti, Irawan MZ. Kualanamu International Airport: Current Development toward Aerotropolis. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology. Insight Society; 2020 Mar 28;10(2):866. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.2.7999

https://tcx-converter.software.informer.com/2.0/

Brunsdon C, Fotheringham AS, Charlton ME. Geographically Weighted Regression: A Method for Exploring Spatial Nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis. Wiley; 2010 Sep 3;28(4):281-98. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1996.tb00936.x

Yang H, Zhang Y, Zhong L, Zhang X, Ling Z. Exploring spatial variation of bike sharing trip production and attraction: A study based on Chicago’s Divvy system. Applied Geography. Elsevier BV; 2020 Feb;115:102130. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102130.

Hyman GM. The Calibration of Trip Distribution Models. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. SAGE Publications; 1969 Jun;1(1):105-12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a010105

Lasdon LS, Fox RL, Ratner MW. Nonlinear optimization using the generalized reduced gradient method. Revue franí§aise d’automatique, informatique, recherche opí©rationnelle Recherche opí©rationnelle. EDP Sciences; 1974;8(V3):73-103. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ro/197408v300731

Smith DP, Hutchinson BG. Goodness of fit statistics for trip distribution models. Transportation Research Part A: General. Elsevier BV; 1981 Jul;15(4):295-303. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(81)90011-x

E. Emmerson, “Accuracy of Trip Forecasts Based on Simple Distribution Models”, TRRL Laboratory Report 1044, Crowthorne, UK, 1982. Available: https://trid.trb.org/view/181616

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).