Geoelectrical Method to Determine Andesite Rock Potential in Kepuh, Ciwandan District, Cilegon City

Deno Ambar Arum (1), Nana Sulaksana (2), Euis Tintin Yuningsih (3)
(1) Faculty of Geological Engineering, University of Padjadjaran, Dipatiukur Street, Bandung City, 40132, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Geological Engineering, University of Padjadjaran, Dipatiukur Street, Bandung City, 40132, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Geological Engineering, University of Padjadjaran, Dipatiukur Street, Bandung City, 40132, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Arum, Deno Ambar, et al. “Geoelectrical Method to Determine Andesite Rock Potential in Kepuh, Ciwandan District, Cilegon City”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 12, no. 5, Oct. 2022, pp. 2060-6, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.12.5.15971.
The Kepuh area has abundant andesite rock resources. These rocks can be used as building materials and for other infrastructure. Based on this, it is necessary to research the potential of andesite resources. The tools used for this research are a resistivity meter, meter, current and potential wires, electrodes, hammer, battery, a global positioning system (GPS), handy talky, laptop and software (IP2win). The research applies the geoelectric method, which measures rock resistivity values. This geoelectric investigation uses the Schlumberger array. The advantages of the Schlumberger array are that fewer electrodes need to be moved for each sounding, and the cable length for the potential electrodes is shorter. Schlumberger soundings generally have better resolution, greater probing depth, and less time-consuming field deployment. The data obtained from the measurements were processed using IP2win software by entering the magnitude of the current, the value of the potential difference, and the electrode. The results of geoelectrical interpretation, the rocks found in the research area are topsoil, tuff, and andesite lava. The resistivity value of the topsoil in the study area mostly varies from 26.3 - 116 ohms - meters, tuff has resistivity values range of 18.8 - 84.2 ohms - meters, and Andesite lava has a resistivity range of 128 - 570 ohms - meters. The average thickness of topsoil is 1.4 meters, the average thickness of tuff is 25.9 meters, and the average thickness of andesite lava is 42.6 meters. Based on the average thickness, andesite rock can be the main commodity.

B. Czinder, B. Vasarhelyi, A. Torok, "Long-term abrasion of rocks assessed by micro-Deval tests and setimation of the abrasion process of rock types based on strength paameters". Eng. Geol. vol .282. Mar. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.105996 .

M. Davraz, H. Ceylan, I. B. Topcu, T. Uygunoglu, "Pozzolanic effect of andesite waste powder on mechanical properties of high strength concrete". Con and Build. Mat. vol. 165, pp. 494-503. Mar. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.043 .

Y. Miao, X. Liu. Y. Hou, J. Li, L. Wang, "Packing Characteristics of aggregate with consideration of particle size and morphology". Appl. Sci. vol. 9, no. 5. pp. 869. Feb. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050869 .

X. Zhou, G. Zhao, S. Tighe, M. Chen, S. Wu, S. Adhikari, Y. Gao, "Quantitative comparison of surface and interface adhesive properties of fine aggregate asphalt mixtures composed of basalt, steel slag, and andesite". Con and Build, Mat. vol. 246. Jun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118507 .

S. E. Celik, J. Gulen, H. A. Viles, "Evaluating the effectiveness of DAP as a consolidant on Turkish building stones". Con and Buil, Mat. vol. 262. Nov. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120765 .

S. Jiao, Q. Zhang, Y. Zhou, W. Chen, X. Liu, G. Gopalakhrisnan, "Progress and challenges of big data research on petrology and geochemistry". Sol. Ear. Sci. vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 105-114. Dec. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sesci.2018.06.002 .

A. Aliyannezhadi, S. R. Mehrnia, S. Kimiagar, H. Rahimi, N. Sadrmohammadi, "Evaluation of GPR method in identificaton hidden faults of Alluvial deposits in north Persian Gulf artificial lake, twenty-two ditrict of Tehran". J. Of App. Geophy. vol. 179. Aug. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104108 .

F. H. Al-Menshed, J.M. Thabit, "Comparison between VES and 2d Imaging Techniques for Delinating Subsurface Plume of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Water Southeast of Karbala City, Iraq". Arab. Jou of Geoscie. vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1-9. Apr. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3479-5 .

S. M. Sharafeldin, K.S. Essa et al, "Shallow geophysical techniques to investigate the groundwater table at the Great Pyramids of Giza, Egypt ". Geosci. Instrum. Method. vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 29-43. Feb. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-8-29-2019 .

A. Susilo, Sunaryo, F. Fina, and Sarjiyana, "Fault Analysis In Pohgajih Village, Blitar, Indonesia Using Resistivity Method For Hazard Risk Reduction". Int. Jour. of Geo, vol.14, no. 41, pp.111-118, Jan. 2018 .

A. Troiano, and M. G. Giuseppe, "Application of principal component analysis to geoelectric recordings". J. Of app, Geophy. vol. 178. Apr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104038 .

R. Eissa, N. Cassidy, J. Pringle, I. Stimpson, "Electrical resistivity tomography array comparisons to detect cleared-wall foundations in brownfield sites". Quar. Jour. Of Eng. Geo. Hyd. vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 137-144. Jun. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2018-192 .

N. Skibbe, T. Ggunther, M. M. Petke, "Improved hydrogeophysical imaging by structural coupling of two-dimensional magnetic resonance and electrical resistivity tomography". Geophy. vol 86, no. 5. pp. 1-56. Jun. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0593.1 .

A. Rastergania, G. Reza et al, "Assessment of the engineering geologiv]cal charasteristics of the Bazoft dam site, SW Iran". Quar. Jou of Eng. Geo and hydr. vol . 52, no. 3, pp. 360-374. Feb. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2017-042 .

M. Kiernan, D. Jackson, J. Montgomery, J. B. Anderson, B. W. Mcdonald, K. C. Davis, "Characterization of a Karst Site using Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Seismic Full Waveform Inversion". J. Of Env, and Eng. Geophy. vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1-11. Mar. 2021. https://doi.org/10.32389/JEEG20-045 .

W. J. Koehn, E. Stacey. T. Kulesza, D. R. Steward, "Characterizing Riverbed Heterogeneity across Shifts in River Discharge through Temporal Changes in Electrical Resistivity". J. Of Env, and Eng. Geophy. vol. 25, no. 4. pp. 581-587. Dec. 2020. https://doi.org/10.32389/JEEG20-049 .

M. A. Iravani, J. Deparis, H. Davarzani, S. Colombano. R. Guerin, A. Maineult, "Complex Electrical Resistivity and Dielectric Permittivity Responses to Dense Non-aqueous Phase Liquids' Imbibition and Drainage in Porous Media: A Laboratory Study". J. Of Env, and Eng. Geophy. vol. 25, no. 4. pp. 557-567. Dec. 2020. https://doi.org/10.32389/JEEG20-050 .

R. Ghanati, and M. M. Petke, "A homotopy continuation inversion of geoelectrical sounding data". J. Appl. Geophys. Vo. 191. Aug. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104356 .

N. C. Mondal, "Geoelectrical signatures for detecting water-bearing zones in a micro-watershed of granitic terrain from Southern India". J. Appl. Geophys. Vol. 191. Aug. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104361 .

I. C. Alle, M. Descloitres, J. M. Vouillamoz, N. Yalo, F. M. Lawson, A. C. Adihou, "Why 1D electrical resistivity techniques can result in inaccurate siting of boreholes in hard rock aquifers and why electrical resistivity tomography must be preferred: The example of Benin, West Africa". J. Afr. Earth Sci. vol. 139, pp. 341-353. Mar. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.12.007 .

R. Leborgane, M. O. Rivett, G. J. Wanangwa, P. Sentenac. R. M. Kalin, "True 2-D Resistivity Imaging from Vertical Electrical Soundings to Support More Sustainable Rural Water Supply Borehole Siting in Malawi". Appl. Sci. vol. 11, no. 3. Jan, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031162 .

J. S. Whiteley ,J. E. Chambers,S. Uhlemann,P. B. Wilkinson,J. M. Kendall, "Geophysical Monitoring of Moisture-Induced Landslides: A Review". Rev. Of Geophy. vol. 57, no. 1, pp 106-145. Mar, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000603 .

Geophysics for the Mineral Exploration Geoscientist, M. Dentith, and S. Mudge, eds., New York, USA, NY : Univ. Cambridge Press, 2014. [Online]. Available https://www.cambridge.org/de/academic/subjects/earth .

Applied Geophysics, W.M. Telford L. P, Geldart, R.E Sheriff, eds., New York, USA, NY : Univ. Cambridge Press, 1990, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120765.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).