DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.4.16529

Development User Interface Hospital Management Information System Based on a Heuristic Evaluation Approach in Surabaya Hospital Medical Services

Amir Ali (1), Muhadi (2), M. Udin Harun Al Rasyid (3), Iwan Syarif (4)
(1) Medical Records, STIKES Yayasan Rumah Sakit Dr. Soetomo, Jl. Kalidami 14-16, Surabaya, 60286, Indonesia
(2) Informatics, Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya, Jl, Raya ITS Keputih Sukolilo, Surabaya, 60111, Indonesia
(3) Informatics, Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya, Jl, Raya ITS Keputih Sukolilo, Surabaya, 60111, Indonesia
(4) Informatics, Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya, Jl, Raya ITS Keputih Sukolilo, Surabaya, 60111, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Ali, Amir, et al. “Development User Interface Hospital Management Information System Based on a Heuristic Evaluation Approach in Surabaya Hospital Medical Services”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 13, no. 4, Aug. 2023, pp. 1456-62, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.13.4.16529.
Citation Format :
Surabaya health service hospital uses the Medical Management System (M applications). However, the application is rarely evaluated. Inputs or feedback obtained from user cases, especially This study, is written to report the improvement of the SIMRS application model based on a heuristic assessment method. The method used in this study was to distribute questionnaires to the research objects that were evaluated, calculate the results of the heuristic assessment using the severity rating method, and then improve the model using the usability theory. This research consists of five usability components that demand improvement: visibility of system status, a match between the system and the real world, user control and freedom, error prevention, and recognition rather than recall. The conclusion is that five usability aspects have been fixed by following the concepts in the heuristic evaluation theory developed in designing a user interface model for the SIMRS application. This research employed a heuristic evaluation approach, which could determine the number of usability problems to be repaired. From the research, the level of problems in the SIMRS application user interface was minor problems. These problem solutions were given low priority in a SIMRS application model adapted to the usability principle.

A. Pratama, MAT. Cahyadi, “Effect of User Interface and User Experience on Application Sales,” INCITEST, 2020.

N. I. M. Ahmad, Nik Azlina Nik. Hamid, “Performing Usability Evaluation on Multi-Platform Based Application for Efficiency, Effectiveness and Satisfaction Enhancement,” iJIM, 2021.

Z. L. Xiong, Wei. Yao, Tian. Qiong Pan, “Usability Heuristic Evaluation for the Hearing Impaired Language Training Mobile App,” Springer Nat., 2020.

E. F. dos Santos Pergentino, Ana Carolina. Dias Canedo and F. L. L. de M. Lima, “Usability Heuristics Evaluation in Search Engine,” Springer Nat., 2020.

D. B. Deborah Lynn, Ninyikiriza. Sourav, Arefin Islam. Setyohadi, “Increasing User Satisfaction of Mobile Commerce using Usability,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., 2020.

K. Hardianto, Zhafirah, “Analysis and Design of User Interface and User Experience (UI / UX) E-Commerce Website PT Pentasada Andalan Kelola Using Task System Centered Design (TCSD) Method,” IEEE, 2020.

N. Al-Qora’n, Lamis. Al Sheik Salem, Omar. Gordon, “Heuristic Evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an Online Teaching Platform: An Educators’ Perspective,” MDPI, 2022.

P. Weichbroth, “Usability of Mobile Applications: A Systematic Literature Study,” IEEE, 2020.

A. C. Wahyuningrum, Tenia. Kartiko, Condro. Wardhana, “Exploring e-Commerce Usability by Heuristic Evaluation as a Compelement of System Usability Scale,” Int. Conf. Adv. Data Sci. E-learning Inf. Syst., 2020.

R. Jeddi, Fateme, Nabovati, Ihsan, Bigham, Reyhane. Farrahe, “Usability evaluation of a comprehensive national health information system: A heuristic evaluation,” Elsevier, 2020.

S. Aldekhyyel, Raniah N. Almulhem, Jwaher A. Binkheder, “Usability of Telemedicine Mobile Applications during COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia: A Heuristic Evaluation of Patient User Interfaces,” MDPI Healthc., 2021.

A. Azizi, Ahmad. Maniati, Mahmodo. Adivi, Hadis GHanbari, Aghajari, Zeinab. Hashemi, Sedigheh. Hajopoor, Bahareh. Qolami, Asma Rabiee. Qolami, Maryam. Azizi, “Usability Evaluation of Hospital Information System According to Heuristic Evaluation,” ijmi, 2021.

M. A. Al-Ma’aitah, “Examining the factors affecting the use of web 2.0 applications for educational purposes in jordanian universities,” J. Manag. Inf. Decis. Sci., 2020.

A. Namoun, Abdallah. Alrehaili, Ahmed. Tufail, “A Review of Automated Website Usability Evaluation Tools: Research Issues and Challenges,” Springer Nat., 2021.

H. Krawiec, Lukasz. Dudycz, “A comparison of heuristics applied for studying the usability of websites,” Elsevier, 2020.

R. B. Mancilla, Pedro C. Santana. Rifón, Luis E. Anido. Castillo,, Juan Contreras. Mariscal, “Heuristic Evaluation of an IoMT System for Remote Health Monitoring in Senior Care,” Environ. Res. dan Public Heal., 2020.

Z. Huang, “Usability of tourism websites: a case study of heuristic evaluation,” Taylor Fr., 2020.

S. S. Kumar, Bimal Aklesh. Goundar, Munil Shiva. chand, “A framework for heuristic evaluation of mobile learning applications,” Springer, 2020.

A. Lecaros, Adrian. Paz, Freddy. Moquillaza, “Challenges and Opportunities on the Application of Heuristic Evaluations: A Systematic Literature Review,” Springer Nat., 2021.

J. Nielsen, “Heuristic evaluation,” Usability Insp. Mehods, 1994.

M. Hertzum, Usability Testing Practitioner’s Guide to Evaluating the user experience. 2020.

K. T. Hariyanto, Didik. Triyono, Bruri Moch, “Usability evaluation of personalized adaptive e-learning system using USE questionnaire,” Knowl. Manag. E-Learning (KM EL), 2020.

D. Aqle, Aboubakr. Khowaja, Kamran. Al-Thani, “Preliminary Evaluation of Interactive Search Engine Interface for Visually Impaired Users,” IEEE, 2020.

S. Bouraghi, Hamid. Rezayi, Sorayya. Amirazodi, Shahrzad. Nabovati, Ehsan. Saeedi, “Evaluating the usability of a national health information system with heuristic method,” J. Educ. Health Promot., 2022.

A. Abulfaraj, Anas. Steele, “Coherent Heuristic Evaluation (CoHE): Toward Increasing the Effectiveness of Heuristic Evaluation for Novice Evaluators,” Springer Nat., 2020.

A. Lam, Duyen. Hoang, Thuong. Sajjanhar, “Identification of Usability Issues of Interactive Technologies in Cultural Heritage through Heuristic Evaluations and Usability Surveys,” MDPI, 2021.

C. M. Dease, Nicholas. Villaespesa, Elesa. MacDonald, “Working together: Using student-driven UX projects to improve library website,” Taylor Fr., 2020.

A. Oulasvirta, Antti. Ramesh Dayama, Niraj. Shiripour, Morteza. John, Maximilian. Karrenbauer, “Combinatorial Optimization of Graphical User Interface Designs,” IEEE, 2020.

Y. J. Nurhudatiana, Arfika. Seo, “An mHealth Application Redesign based on Nielsen’s Usability Heuristics: A Case Study of Halodoc,” ICEBA, 2020.

M. S. Zardari, Baqar Ali. Hussain, Said. Arain, Aijaz Ahmed. Rizvi, Wajid H. Vighio, “QUEST e”‘learning portal: applying heuristic evaluation, usability testing and eye tracking,” Spirnger Nat., 2020.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).