DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.1.16547

3D Printed Prosthetic Robot Arm with Grasping Detection System for Children

Devin Babu (1), Abdul Nasir (2), Ravindran (3), Mohannad Farag (4), Waheb A. Jabbar (5)
(1) Faculty of Electrical & Electronic Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Pahang, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
(2) Faculty of Electrical & Electronic Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Pahang, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
(3) Faculty of Electrical & Electronic Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Pahang, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
(4) Faculty of Engineering/ Software Engineering Department, KARABUK University (KBU), Karabuk, 78050 Merkez Karabük, Turkey
(5) School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Birmingham City University, Birmingham B4 7XG, West Midlands, England, United Kingdom
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
[1]
D. Babu, A. Nasir, Ravindran, M. Farag, and W. A. Jabbar, “3D Printed Prosthetic Robot Arm with Grasping Detection System for Children”, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 226–234, Feb. 2023.
Citation Format :
Prosthetic robot arms have been an alternative replacement for upper limb-related disability, especially among children as it helps them perform regular activities such as holding tools, eating, and drinking. This research aims to develop a 3D prosthetic robot arm using SolidWorks and 3D printer, using a low-cost and straightforward mechanism for children. This paper proposes a close loop control system with position control for the prosthetic robot arm to achieve an appropriate grasping force focusing on solid-shaped objects using PID control. The PID controller controls the system's response to perform in the most efficient path. Force-sensitive resistors (FSR) are attached to all fingers to measure the grasping force acting on objects with different surfaces, dimensions, and weights. The controller results showed improvement in the overshoot percentage of 0.902%, as overshoot is essential in preventing the grasped object's deformations. The analysis of the experiment shows that the mean grasping force and static coefficient friction of each object are different regardless of the material the object is made of and the object's mass. For example, a cube-shaped object made of wood requires 0.5288 N of grasping force to grasp the object firmly compared to a plastic-made cube that only requires 0.3245 N to hold the cube. On the other hand, the static coefficient friction for the wood cube is 3.1708 and 0.4725 for the plastic cube. Further research can be done by designing the prosthetic robot arm with independent motorized and multi-degree movement of fingers.

N. N. Unanyan and A. A. Belov, “Low-Price Prosthetic Hand Controlled by EMG Signals,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 54, no. 13, pp. 299-304, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.IFACOL.2021.10.463.

J. Andrí©s-Esperanza, J. L. Iserte-Vilar, I. Llop-Harillo, and A. Pí©rez-Gonzí¡lez, “Affordable 3D-printed tendon prosthetic hands: Expectations and benchmarking questioned,” Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J., vol. 31, p. 101053, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JESTCH.2021.08.010.

J. Zbinden, E. Lendaro, and M. Ortiz-Catalan, “Prosthetic embodiment: systematic review on definitions, measures, and experimental paradigms,” J. NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2022 191, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1-16, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1186/S12984-022-01006-6.

N. Gorman, J. Feng, and S. Y. Marin Pareja, “Enhancing Prosthetic Hand Functionality with Elastic 3D-Printed Thermoplastic Polyurethane,” Lect. Notes Networks Syst., vol. 263, pp. 183-190, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-80744-3_23.

M. Orellana-Donoso, J. J. Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, M. Gold-Semmler, Guernica-Garcia-Gorigoitia, R. Shane-Tubbs, and E. Santana-Machuca, “Neural entrapments associated with musculoskeletal anatomical variations of the upper limb: Literature review,” Transl. Res. Anat., vol. 22, p. 100094, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.TRIA.2020.100094.

M. A. Voutsalath, C. K. Bichakjian, F. Pelosi, D. Blum, T. M. Johnson, and P. M. Farrehi, “Electrosurgery and implantable electronic devices: Review and implications for office-based procedures,” Dermatologic Surg., vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 889-899, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1111/J.1524-4725.2011.02006.X.

J. Zuniga et al., “Cyborg beast: A low-cost 3d-printed prosthetic hand for children with upper-limb differences,” BMC Res. Notes, vol. 8, no. 1, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1186/S13104-015-0971-9.

D. Babu, A. Nasir, A. S. Jamaludin, and M. H. Rosle, “Holding, Grasping and Sensing of Prosthetic Robot Arm Like a Real Human Hand, a Journey Beyond Limits: An Extensive Review,” pp. 485-504, 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-4115-2_39.

A. Gonzalez, L. Garcia, J. Kilby, and P. McNair, “Robotic devices for paediatric rehabilitation: a review of design features,” Biomed. Eng. Online, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1-33, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12938-021-00920-5.

T. Singh, S. Kumar, and S. Sehgal, “3D printing of engineering materials: A state of the art review,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 28, pp. 1927-1931, 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.05.334.

F. Å proch, V. Schindleroví¡, and I. Å ajdleroví¡, “Using 3D printing technology in prototype production to control the dimensions of complexly shaped products,” Manuf. Technol., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 385-393, 2020, doi: 10.21062/mft.2020.061.

A. J. Sterkenburg et al., “Quality of life of patients with 3D-printed arm prostheses in a rural area of Sierra Leone,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 7, p. e07447, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2021.E07447.

M. Ortiz-Catalan, E. Mastinu, C. M. Greenspon, and S. J. Bensmaia, “Chronic Use of a Sensitized Bionic Hand Does Not Remap the Sense of Touch,” Cell Rep., vol. 33, no. 12, p. 108539, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.CELREP.2020.108539.

A. Mehman Sefat, S. Ahmad, A. Angleraud, E. Rahtu, and R. Pieters, “Robotic grasping in agile production,” Deep Learn. Robot Percept. Cogn., pp. 407-433, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-32-385787-1.00021-X.

S. Nojiri, A. Yamaguchi, Y. Suzuki, T. Tsuji, and T. Watanabe, “Sensing and Control of Friction Mode for Contact Area Variable Surfaces (Friction-variable Surface Structure),” 2020 3rd IEEE Int. Conf. Soft Robot. RoboSoft 2020, pp. 215-222, May 2020, doi: 10.1109/ROBOSOFT48309.2020.9116019.

R. R. Devaraja, R. MaskeliÅ«nas, and R. DamaÅ¡eviÄius, “Design and Evaluation of Anthropomorphic Robotic Hand for Object Grasping and Shape Recognition,” Comput. 2021, Vol. 10, Page 1, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 1, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3390/COMPUTERS10010001.

M. D. Twardowski, S. H. Roy, Z. Li, P. Contessa, G. De Luca, and J. C. Kline, “Motor unit drive: A neural interface for real-time upper limb prosthetic control,” J. Neural Eng., vol. 16, no. 1, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/AAEB0F.

U. Wijk, I. K. Carlsson, C. Antfolk, A. Bjí¶rkman, and B. Rosí©n, “Sensory Feedback in Hand Prostheses: A Prospective Study of Everyday Use,” Front. Neurosci., vol. 14, p. 663, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.3389/FNINS.2020.00663/BIBTEX.

L. F. Engels, A. W. Shehata, E. J. Scheme, J. W. Sensinger, and C. Cipriani, “When less is more-discrete tactile feedback dominates continuous audio biofeedback in the integrated percept while controlling a myoelectric prosthetic hand,” Front. Neurosci., vol. 13, no. JUN, 2019, doi: 10.3389/FNINS.2019.00578.

M. Rossi, M. Bianchi, E. Battaglia, M. G. Catalano, and A. Bicchi, “HapPro: A Wearable Haptic Device for Proprioceptive Feedback,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 138-149, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2836672.

S. F. Ahmed, M. H. Tanveer, I. J. Kiwarkis, and H. B. Basy, “Design and controlling of low-cost prosthetic hand using force sensor,” Proc. - 3rd Int. Conf. Inf. Comput. Technol. ICICT 2020, pp. 347-350, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ICICT50521.2020.00061.

Novi Rahayu, “View of Early Warning Of Leaking Lpg Gas Through Short Message Service (Sms) And Loudspeaker Tool Using Arduino Uno,” Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological ScienceVol 1(2) 2020: 91-102, 2020. https://journal.yrpipku.com/index.php/jaets/article/view/61/36 (accessed Apr. 24, 2022).

K. S. Kaswan, S. P. Singh, and S. Sagar, “Role of Arduino in real world applications,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1113-1116, 2020.

A. K. Aneesha, S. Bhat, and M. Kanthi, “Load Cell and FSR-Based Hand-Assistive Device,” Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., vol. 1198, pp. 148-156, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-6584-7_15.

D. Esposito et al., “A Piezoresistive Sensor to Measure Muscle Contraction and Mechanomyography,” Sensors 2018, Vol. 18, Page 2553, vol. 18, no. 8, p. 2553, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.3390/S18082553.

Liu Jun, “Design and Research of Servo Motor Control System Based on Stm32 Single Chip Microcomputer | Solid State Technology,” Solid State Technology Vol. 63 No. 3 (2020), 2020. http://solidstatetechnology.us/index.php/JSST/article/view/3681 (accessed Apr. 24, 2022).

A. A. Kadhum and M. M. Abdulhussein, “Implementation dc motor as servomotor by using arduino and optical rotary encoder,” Mater. Today, Proc., Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.03.576.

D. C. Adam Maxwell Doumin1, Zul Hilmi Che Daud2,*, Zainab Asus2, Izhari Izmi Mazali1, Mohd Kameil Abdul Hamid1, Mohd Farid Muhamad Said2, “Recent Studies on Lithium-ion Battery Thermal Behaviour for Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicles: A Review | Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences,” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences61, Issue 2(2019) 262-272, 2019. https://www.akademiabaru.com/submit/index.php/arfmts/article/view/2678 (accessed Apr. 24, 2022).

M. Abdelbaky, J. R. Peeters, S. Van den Eynde, I. Zaplana, and W. Dewulf, “A comparative assessment of resource-use criticality in advanced lithium-ion battery technologies,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 105, pp. 7-12, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.PROCIR.2022.02.002.

I. Llop-Harillo, A. Pí©rez-Gonzí¡lez, J. Starke, and T. Asfour, “The Anthropomorphic Hand Assessment Protocol (AHAP),” Rob. Auton. Syst., vol. 121, p. 103259, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2019.103259.

A. Prakash and S. Sharma, “A low-cost system to control prehension force of a custom-made myoelectric hand prosthesis,” Res. Biomed. Eng., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 237-247, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s42600-020-00064-w.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).