Investigating Factors in Artificial Intelligence Literacy for Korean Elementary School Students

Hyunwoo Moon (1), HakNeung Go (2), Youngjun Lee (3), Seong-Won Kim (4)
(1) Korea National University of Education, Cheongju, 28173, Republic of Korea
(2) Korea National University of Education, Cheongju, 28173, Republic of Korea
(3) Korea National University of Education, Cheongju, 28173, Republic of Korea
(4) Chosun University, Dong-Gu, Gwangju, 61452, Republic of Korea
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Moon , Hyunwoo, et al. “Investigating Factors in Artificial Intelligence Literacy for Korean Elementary School Students”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 14, no. 4, Aug. 2024, pp. 1226-32, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.14.4.16998.
In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly evolved due to significant improvements in computing performance, increased utilization of large datasets, and algorithm advancements, leading to widespread societal changes. These developments promise innovative applications of AI across various fields but highlight the necessity of ethical use and deep understanding of AI, underscoring the importance of AI literacy. While current research on AI literacy primarily focuses on secondary and higher education, the need for education that impacts cognitive and social development at the elementary level is increasingly emphasized. Furthermore, understanding the factors influencing AI literacy is crucial for educators and policymakers in designing and implementing effective AI education programs. This study investigated how gender, grade level, experiences related to AI, interest in AI, and programming language experience affect AI literacy among elementary students, revealing that these factors significantly impact AI literacy levels. Male students showed higher AI literacy than female students, and AI literacy improved with higher grade levels. Direct and indirect experiences related to AI positively influenced literacy improvement, and high interest in AI and experience with programming languages played essential roles. These findings provide evidence for developing effective AI education strategies for elementary students, emphasizing the importance of educational programs that meet students' diverse backgrounds and needs. These factors in AI education can enhance students' literacy levels and contribute to nurturing talents equipped with the necessary technical, ethical, and problem-solving skills for future society.

Y. Xu et al., “Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research,” The Innovation, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 100179, Nov. 2021, doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179.

Y. Pan, “Heading toward Artificial Intelligence 2.0,” Engineering, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 409–413, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2016.04.018.

I. Celik, “Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 138, p. 107468, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468.

Y. Kong, “Are ‘Intersectionally Fair’ AI Algorithms Really Fair to Women of Color? A Philosophical Analysis,” 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Jun. 2022, doi:10.1145/3531146.3533114.

Kim, S. W., and Lee, Y. J. "The artificial intelligence literacy scale for middle school students." Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 225-238, 2022.

D. T. K. Ng, J. K. L. Leung, S. K. W. Chu, and M. S. Qiao, “Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, p. 100041, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041.

D. Touretzky, C. Gardner-McCune, F. Martin, and D. Seehorn, “Envisioning AI for K-12: What Should Every Child Know about AI?,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, no. 01, pp. 9795–9799, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019795.

R. Chatila et al., “Trustworthy AI,” Reflections on Artificial Intelligence for Humanity, pp. 13–39, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-69128-8_2.

D. T. K. Ng, J. K. L. Leung, K. W. S. Chu, and M. S. Qiao, “AI Literacy: Definition, Teaching, Evaluation and Ethical Issues,” Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 504–509, Oct. 2021, doi:10.1002/pra2.487.

D. Long and B. Magerko, “What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations,” Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Apr. 2020, doi:10.1145/3313831.3376727.

L. Casal-Otero, A. Catala, C. Fernández-Morante, M. Taboada, B. Cebreiro, and S. Barro, “AI literacy in K-12: a systematic literature review,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 10, no. 1, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7.

J. Su and W. Yang, “Artificial intelligence in early childhood education: A scoping review,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, p. 100049, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100049.

J. Su and Y. Zhong, “Artificial Intelligence (AI) in early childhood education: Curriculum design and future directions,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, p. 100072, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100072.

S. Kewalramani, G. Kidman, and I. Palaiologou, “Using Artificial Intelligence (AI)-interfaced robotic toys in early childhood settings: a case for children’s inquiry literacy,” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 652–668, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1080/1350293x.2021.1968458.

I. Celik, “Exploring the Determinants of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy: Digital Divide, Computational Thinking, Cognitive Absorption,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 83, p. 102026, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2023.102026.

S.-W. Kim and Y. Lee, “Investigation into the Influence of Socio-Cultural Factors on Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 9907–9935, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12172-y.

Trilling, Bernie, and Charles Fadel. 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.

E. J. Instefjord and E. Munthe, “Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 67, pp. 37–45, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016.

H. Tinmaz, Y.-T. Lee, M. Fanea-Ivanovici, and H. Baber, “A systematic review on digital literacy,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 9, no. 1, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40561-022-00204-y.

H. Kong, Y. Yuan, Y. Baruch, N. Bu, X. Jiang, and K. Wang, “Influences of artificial intelligence (AI) awareness on career competency and job burnout,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 717–734, Jan. 2021, doi:10.1108/ijchm-07-2020-0789.

Lee, C. "Direction of software education in practical arts for cultivating competencies in the AI era." Practical education research., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 41-64, 2020.

Kim, T., Ryu, M., and Han, S. "Framework research for AI education for elementary and middle school students." Korean Association of Artificial Intelligence Education Transactions., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 31-42, 2020.

Yi, Y., and Park, Y. "Establishing a definition of AI literacy and designing a liberal arts education program." The Journal of Language & Literature., vol. 85, pp. 451-474, 2021.

Kim, Y. G. "Analysis of Factors Affecting Acceptance Attitude of AI Chatbot Consulting Service: Focused on Service Value Mediating Effect." The Journal of the Korea Contents Association., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 255-269, 2022.

E. Aivaloglou and F. Hermans, “Early Programming Education and Career Orientation,” Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Feb. 2019, doi:10.1145/3287324.3287358.

S. Beyer, K. Rynes, J. Perrault, K. Hay, and S. Haller, “Gender differences in computer science students,” Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.1145/611892.611930.

C. Comber, A. Colley, D. J. Hargreaves, and L. Dorn, “The effects of age, gender and computer experience upon computer attitudes,” Educational Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 123–133, Jun. 1997, doi:10.1080/0013188970390201.

E. Chang, F. Zhen, and Y. Cao, “Empirical Analysis of the Digital Divide from the Perspective of Internet Usage Patterns: A Case Study of Nanjing,” International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 49–63, Jan. 2016, doi:10.14246/irspsd.4.1_49.

National Information Society Agency (NIA), "The Report on the Digital Divide," National Information Society Agency, 2022. [Online]. Available:www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1367. Accessed on: Dec. 9, 2022.

S. Na, S. Heo, S. Han, Y. Shin, and Y. Roh, “Acceptance Model of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Technologies in Construction Firms: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Combination with the Technology–Organisation–Environment (TOE) Framework,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 90, Jan. 2022, doi:10.3390/buildings12020090.

Kim, S. W., and Lee, Y. J. "Development of a software education curriculum for secondary schools." Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 127-141, 2016.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).