DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.1.17151

Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Determining the Development Strategy of Tempeh Processed Product

Mohamad Harisudin (1), R. Kunto Adi (2), Rr Aulia Qonita (3)
(1) Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia
(2) Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia
(3) Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
[1]
M. Harisudin, R. K. Adi, and R. A. Qonita, “Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Determining the Development Strategy of Tempeh Processed Product”, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 283–288, Feb. 2023.
Citation Format :
This study aims to determine the criteria and best strategies for developing new products processed tempeh in Surakarta City. The research design used is descriptive-analytical by basing data from key informants through in-depth interviews combined with focus group discussions. The collected data is compiled, analyzed, and discussed to illustrate the reality of tempeh-processed SMEs in the field. Aggregation techniques for making conclusions from diverse information using source triangulation. While analytical tools determine strategic priorities using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The study results obtained six criteria for developing new products for processed tempeh. These criteria are market demand, risk of production failure, tempeh processed technology that has been mastered, waste handling, absorbing labor, and profits. In contrast, the alternative strategies that are successfully formulated based on the SWOT matrix consist of three alternative strategies: product differentiation, improving product quality and packaging, and the legality of products supported by digital marketing. Based on AHP obtained, the most important criterion is profit. In contrast, the priority strategy for developing processed tempeh products is to improve the product's quality and packaging. This study provides helpful information in solving the problem of SMEs in determining the priorities of various alternatives faced by SMEs. AHP-based analysis can overcome the weakness of SMEs who do not orderly document quantitative data because AHP can process both quantitative and qualitative data.

A. D. Ahnan-Winarno, L. Cordeiro, F. G. Winarno, J. Gibbons, and H. Xiao, “Tempeh: A semicentennial review on its health benefits, fermentation, safety, processing, sustainability, and affordability,” Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1717-1767, 2021, doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12710.

N. A. Zainal Abidin, Z. Mohd Zin, M. A. A. Abdullah, N. D. Rusli, and M. K. Zainol, “Physicochemical properties and sensory acceptance of canavalia ensiformis tempeh energy bar,” Food Res., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1637-1645, 2020, doi: 10.26656/fr.2017.4(5).150.

H. Raswanti, A. O. Aditya, S. R. O. Aisyah, A. Alham, and I. Hanidah, “Upaya Peningkatan Konsumsi Tempe Melalui Diversifikasi Olahan,” Agricore J. Agribisnis dan Sos. Ekon. Pertan. Unpad, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 359-426, 2018, doi: 10.24198/agricore.v3i1.17804.

S. Sumaedi and Sumardjo, “A model of traditional functional food consumption behaviour,” Br. Food J., 2020, doi: 10.1108/BFJ-01-2020-0019.

S. B. Erkan, H. N. Gí¼rler, D. G. Bilgin, M. Germec, and I. Turhan, “Production and characterization of tempehs from different sources of legume by Rhizopus oligosporus,” Lwt, vol. 119, p. 108880, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108880.

T. Z. H. Nicole, T. S. Nichelle, T. E. Elizabeth, and O. Yuliarti, “Formulation of functional crackers enriched with fermented soybean (tempeh) paste: rheological and microstructural properties,” Futur. Foods, vol. 4, no. May, p. 100050, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100050.

A. Pratiwi, A. L. Riani, M. Harisudin, and H. P. Sarah Rum, “The development of market oriented batik products based on customer buying intention (industrial center of batik sragen Indonesia),” Int. J. Manag., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 373-389, 2020, doi: 10.34218/IJM.11.3.2020.040.

I. M. Wardana, I. P. G. Sukaatmadja, and M. Setini, “Formulation of Business Strategies to Improve Business Performance by SWOT and SQSPM Approach in Era Pandemic: A Study on Culinary MSMEs,” Qual. - Access to Success, vol. 23, no. 188, pp. 47-55, 2022, doi: 10.47750/qas/23.188.07.

N. Saqib, “A positioning strategy for a tourist destination, based on analysis of customers’ perceptions and satisfactions: A case of Kashmir, India,” J. Tour. Anal., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 131-151, 2019, doi: 10.1108/JTA-05-2019-0019.

I. W. Wardani, D. A. Wijaya, and A. Saeroji, “Culinary Tourism Development Model in Surakarta, Indonesia,” KnE Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 342-359, 2018, doi: 10.18502/kss.v3i5.2342.

A. Kabir, S. Miah, and A. Islam, “Factors influencing eating behavior and dietary intake among resident students in a public university in Bangladesh: A qualitative study,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1-17, 2018, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198801.

J. W. Cresswel, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Third edut. New Delhi, India: SAGE Publications India Pvtt Ltd, 2009.

M. Harisudin, R. K. Adi, and R. A. Qonita, Charm, Efficacy and Business Strategy Opportunities Tempeh (Pesona, Khasiat dan Peluang Strategi Bisnis Tempe). Surakarta: CV Indotama Solo, 2021.

R. E. Nugroho and M. S. Iskandar, “Application of AHP for Supplier Selection in Construction Companies,” Dinasti Int. J. Manag. Sci., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 921-933, 2020, doi: 10.36348/sjet.2020.v05i04.008.

H. Flí¤mig, P. Fieltsch, C. Matt, K. Rosenberger, and M. Steffen, “Mobility behavior of companies in urban areas: A triangulation approach to explore the potential for battery electric vehicle,” Urban Freight Transp. Syst., pp. 239-251, 2019, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817362-6.00013-6.

D. Duchatelet and V. Donche, “Assessing student learning during simulations in education: Methodological opportunities and challenges when applying a longitudinal case study design,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 72, no. 2022, pp. 1-9, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101129.

D. I. Sensuse, A. Arief, and P. Mursanto, “An Empirical Validation of Foundation Models for Smart Government in Indonesia,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1132-1141, 2022, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.12.3.13442.

T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Int. J. Serv. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83-98, 2008, doi: 10.1504/ijssci.2008.017590.

í–. F. Gí¶rí§í¼n and H. Kí¼í§í¼kí¶nder, “A novel performance evaluation technique based on integrated weighting approach: A case study in the field of sport management,” Decis. Sci. Lett., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 511-524, 2021, doi: 10.5267/j.dsl.2021.5.004.

V. K. Koganti, N. Menikonda, S. P. Anbuudayasankar, T. Krishnaraj, R. K. Athhukuri, and M. S. Vastav, “GRAHP TOP model for supplier selection in Supply Chain: A hybrid MCDM approach,” Decis. Sci. Lett., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 65-80, 2019, doi: 10.5267/j.dsl.2018.5.002.

T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Second Edi. New York: Springer, 2012.

I. Judrupa, “Regional competitiveness as an aspect promoting sustainability of Latvia,” Eur. J. Sustain. Dev., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 650-667, 2021, doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p650.

H. Bermeo-Andrade, A. F. Bahamón-Monje, R. Aragón-Calderón, Y. Beltrí¡n-Vargas, and N. Gutií©rrez-Guzmí¡n, “Is Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Quality Related to a Combined Farmer-Farm Profile”¯?,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 1-14, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229518.

E. B. Ali, E. B. Agyekum, and P. Adadi, “Agriculture for Sustainable Development: A SWOT-AHP Assessment of Ghana’s Planting for Food and Jobs Initiative,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1-24, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13020628.

S. Khan, “Investment priorities of northeast indian smes family business entrepreneurs based on bocr aspects,” Accounting, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 469-478, 2021, doi: 10.5267/j.ac.2020.11.003.

W. A. Teniwut, Marimin, and T. Djatna, “GIS-Based multi-criteria decision making model for site selection of seaweed farming information centre: A lesson from small Islands, Indonesia,” Decis. Sci. Lett., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 137-150, 2019, doi: 10.5267/j.dsl.2018.8.001.

H. in Kwon, B. H. Baek, Y. S. Jeon, Y. L. Kim, and H. Bin Jung, “Key Factors of Service Design Methodology for Manufacturing Servitization,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-25, 2021, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2021.1883220.

H. Lee and B. Kim, “Invigorating Care Farm Ecosystem Based on Public Service Innovation: Case of South Korea,” Adm. Sci., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1-19, 2022, doi: 10.3390/admsci12020058.

J. He, Y. Qian, and X. Yin, “Supplier evaluation and selection system of embedded e-commerce platform based on big data,” Int. J. Inf. Syst. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1-18, 2022, doi: 10.4018/IJISSCM.287629.

J. Rezaei, A. Arab, and M. Mehregan, “Equalizing bias in eliciting attribute weights in multiattribute decision-making: experimental research,” J. Behav. Decis. Mak., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1-19, 2022, doi: 10.1002/bdm.2262.

J. Choi and J. Choi, “Technical Feasibility Study Model of Aged Apartment Renovation Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process,” J. Civ. Eng. Manag., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 39-50, 2022, doi: 10.3846/jcem.2021.16013.

Y. I. Yuana, “Decision support system of food selection for obese sufferer,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1007, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1007/1/012075.

I. Cahyadinata, Nusril, and Gushevinalti, “Descriptive, correlation analysis and analytical hierarchy process of coastal community empowerment of Bengkulu City, Indonesia,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1304-1310, 2020, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.10.3.2659.

M. Harisudin, R. K. Adi, and R. R. A. Qonita, “Synergy Grand Strategy Matrix, Swot and Qspm As Determinants of Tempeh Product Development Strategy,” J. Sustain. Sci. Manag., vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 62-82, 2022, doi: 10.46754/jssm.2022.08.004.

M. Harisudin, N. Setyowati, and B. W. Utami, “Formulating and choosing strategy of processed catfish product development using the SWOT matrix and QSPM; a case study in boyolali regency,” World Appl. Sci. J., vol. 30, no. 30 A, pp. 56-61, 2014, doi: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.30.icmrp.9.

S. Y. M. Taneo, D. Hadiwidjojo, S. Sunaryo, and S. Sudjatno, “Creative destruction and knowledge creation as the mediation between innovation speed and competitiveness of food small and medium-sized enterprises in Malang, Indonesia,” Compet. Rev., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 195-218, 2020, doi: 10.1108/CR-12-2017-0090.

B. Jatmiko, U. Udin, R. Raharti, T. Laras, and K. F. Ardhi, “Strategies for MSMEs to Achieve Sustainable Competitive Advantage: The SWOT Analysis Method,” J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 505-515, 2021, doi: 10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.0505.

Q. Alzaghal and M. Mukhtar, “Factors affecting the success of incubators and the moderating role of information and communication technologies,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 538-545, 2017, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.7.2.1678.

M. M. Parast and A. Safari, “Enhancing the quality and competitiveness of small businesses: A pooled cross-sectional analysis,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 246, no. 2022, pp. 1-21, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108410.

M. P. Hakim, L. D. A. Zanetta, J. M. de Oliveira, and D. T. da Cunha, “The mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods in Brazil: Consumer’s knowledge, trust, and risk perception,” Food Res. Int., vol. 132, no. January, pp. 1-10, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109053.

F. M. Alhamdi, “Role of packaging in consumer buying behavior,” Manag. Sci. Lett., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1191-1196, 2020, doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.11.040.

K. ÅšwiÄ…der and M. Marczewska, “Trends of using sensory evaluation in new product development in the food industry in countries that belong to the eit regional innovation scheme,” Foods, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1-18, 2021, doi: 10.3390/foods10020446.

B. Hutahayan and S. Yufra, “Innovation speed and competitiveness of food small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) in Malang, Indonesia: Creative destruction as the mediation,” J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1152-1173, 2019, doi: 10.1108/JSTPM-12-2017-0071.

K. Buchmí¼ller, A. Bearth, and M. Siegrist, “The influence of packaging on consumers’ risk perception of chemical household products,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 100, pp. 1-7, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103676.

D. T. Nimfa, M. U. H. Uzir, L. N. Maimako, B. Eneizan, A. S. A. Latiff, and S. A. Wahab, “The impact of innovation competitive advantage on product quality for sustainable growth among SMES: An empirical analysis,” Int. J. Bus. Sci. Appl. Manag., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 39-62, 2021.

M. Harisudin, R. K. Adi, and N. A. K. Pratama, “Performance improvement strategies based on balanced scorecard for rural cooperative: The case of Indonesia,” Int. J. Trade Glob. Mark., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 161-181, 2020, doi: 10.1504/IJTGM.2020.106757.

V. Naranje, A. Naranje, and S. Salunkhe, Improving process performance with world-class manufacturing technique: A case in tea packaging industry. Springer Singapore, 2019.

D. Vrontis, R. Chaudhuri, and S. Chatterjee, “Adoption of Digital Technologies by SMEs for Sustainability and Value Creation”¯: Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 1-19, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ su14137949.

C. I. Pardo Martí­nez and A. Cotte Poveda, “Strategies to improve sustainability: An analysis of 120 microenterprises in an emerging economy,” Glob. Sustain., vol. 5, no. e3, pp. 1-14, 2022, doi: 10.1017/sus.2022.3.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).