Intelligent Decision Support System for Supply Chain Risk Management Process (SCRMP) with COBIT 5 in Furniture Industry

Johanes Fernandes Andry (1), - Hadiyanto (2), Vincensius Gunawan (3)
(1) Doctoral Program of Information System, School of Post Graduate Studies, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia & Information System Department, Universitas Bunda Mulia, Jakarta, Indonesia
(2) School of Postgraduate Studies, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
(3) School of Postgraduate Studies, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Andry, Johanes Fernandes, et al. “Intelligent Decision Support System for Supply Chain Risk Management Process (SCRMP) With COBIT 5 in Furniture Industry”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 13, no. 2, Mar. 2023, pp. 736-43, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.13.2.17359.
Sustainable supply chain management can be a new strategy in the industry, especially in the furniture sector. In its implementation, different sources of risk factors emerge because the nature of the supply chain is too complex, causing supply and demand uncertainty for production. The furniture industry needs to implement supply chain risk management to overcome problems and cause a loss of trust from customers. This study aims to identify and manage supply chain risks in the furniture industry using the Supply Chain Risk Management Process (SCRMP) and COBIT 5 methods. After identifying the risk, the risk impact measurement uses the COBIT 5 method with the Deliver, Service, and Support (DSS) domain implemented into the decision support system. To find out changes after system implementation, the author conducts a risk assessment according to the COBIT 5 standard and evaluates the possibility of a risk occurring. The result of this study is a mapping of the handling of negative scenarios of risk after implementing the system that includes governance standards and input data to produce output documentation. Documents are applied to the decision support system to reduce risks in the supply chain. The SCRMP and COBIT 5 methods can manage supply chain risk more effectively. It guides the risk assessment area and provides information technology governance to the system. The implication of future research is to define standard operating procedure documentation for the application of decision support systems in all divisions of the furniture industry.

R. S. D. Astuti, A. D. Astuti, and Hadiyanto, "Preliminary Design of Industrial Symbiosis of Smes Using Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA) Method," E3S Web Conf., vol. 31, pp. 1-7, 2018, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/20183104008.

S. Yadav and S. P. Singh, "Blockchain Critical Success Factors for Sustainable Supply Chain," Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 152, pp. 1-11, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104505.

K. F. Kodrat, S. Sinulingga, H. Napitupulu, and R. A. Hadiguna, “Supply Chain Performance Measurement Model of Passion Fruit Agro-Industry for Sustainable Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises with System Dynamics in North Sumatra Province,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1885-1891, 2019, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.9.6.9076.

I. Kocoglu, S. Z. Imamoglu, H. Ince, and H. Keskin, “The Effect of Supply Chain Integration on Information Sharing: Enhancing the Supply Chain Performance,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 24, pp. 1630-1649, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.016.

N. A. Asnordin, V. P. K. Sundram, and S. Norance, "The Effect of Information and Communication Technology on the Teaching Profession," Turkish J. Comput. Math. Educ., vol. 12, no. 14, pp. 1138-1147, 2021, doi: 10.1177/089202069901300108.

J. Hidayati and S. Hasibuan, "Value Chain Analysis and Value Added Enhancement of Indonesia," Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 397-404, 2019.

M. K. Chinyemba and J. Phiri, "An Investigation into Information Security Threats from Insiders and How to Mitigate Them: A Case Study of Zambian Public Sector," J. Comput. Sci., vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1389-1400, 2018, doi: 10.3844/jcssp.2018.1389.1400.

R. Tummala and T. Schoenherr, "Assessing And Managing Risks Using the Supply Chain Risk Management Process (SCRMP)," Supply Chain Manag. An Int. J., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 474-483, 2011, doi: 10.1108/13598541111171165.

U. R. De Oliveira, C. O. Dos Santos, G. E. L. Chaves, and V. A. Fernandes, "Analysis of the MORT Method Applicability for Risk Management in Supply Chains," Oper. Manag. Res., pp. 1-22, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12063-021-00248-2.

J. Y. Lai, J. Wang, and Y. H. Chiu, "Evaluating Blockchain Technology for Reducing Supply Chain Risks," Inf. Syst. E-bus. Manag., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1089-1111, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10257-021-00533-4.

E. D. Madyatmadja, L. Liliana, J. F. Andry, and H. Tannady, "Risk Analysis of Human Resource Information Systems Using COBIT 5," J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 98, no. 21, pp. 1-7, 2020.

M. Wolden, R. Valverde, and M. Talla, “The Effectiveness of COBIT 5 Information Security Framework for Reducing Cyber Attacks on Supply Chain Management System,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1846-1852, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.355.

N. G. Filho, N. Rego, and J. Claro, "Supply Chain Flows and Stocks as Entry Points for Cyber-Risks," Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 181, no. 2020, pp. 261-268, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.145.

E. Yuliantini, J. Chin, T. N. Tukhkanen, E. L. Lydia, and K. Shankar, "The Role of Decision Support System and Risk Management," J. Crit. Rev., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 111-116, 2019, doi: 10.22159/jcr.06.05.19.

A. Di Graziano, V. Marchetta, J. Grande, and S. Fiore, “Application of a Decision Support Tool for the Risk Management Of a Metro System,” Int. J. Rail Transp., pp. 1-23, 2021, doi: 10.1080/23248378.2021.1906341.

M. Y. Tabari, A. Memariani, and O. M. Ebadati E., Developing a Decision Support System for Big Data Analysis and Cost Allocation in National Healthcare. Elsevier Inc., 2019.

F. Ullah, S. Qayyum, M. J. Thaheem, F. Al-Turjman, and S. M. E. Sepasgozar, "Risk Management in Sustainable Smart Cities Governance: A TOE Framework," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 167, pp. 1-22, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120743.

J. O. Aguila and W. ElMaraghy, "System Dynamics Modelling for Supply Chain Disruptions," Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1757-1775, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1725171.

J. B. Oliveira, M. Jin, R. S. Lima, J. E. Kobza, and J. A. B. Montevechi, "The Role of Simulation and Optimization Methods in Supply Chain Risk Management: Performance and Review Standpoints," Simul. Model. Pract. Theory, vol. 92, pp. 17-44, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2018.11.007.

S. Tangprasert, "A Study of Information Technology Risk Management of Government and Business Organizations in Thailand using COSO-ERM based on the COBIT 5 Framework," J. Appl. Sci., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 13-24, 2020, doi: 10.14416/j.appsci.2020.01.002.

M. Gul, S. Mete, F. Serin, and E. Celik, "Fine-Kinney Occupational Risk Assessment Method and Its Extensions by Fuzzy Sets: A State-of-the-Art Review," Stud. Fuzziness Soft Comput., vol. 398, pp. 1-11, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-52148-6_1.

C. Y. Chu, K. Park, and G. E. Kremer, "A Global Supply Chain Risk Management Framework: An Application of Text-Mining to Identify Region-Specific Supply Chain Risks," Adv. Eng. Informatics, vol. 45, pp. 1-17, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2020.101053.

B. Zvanut, M. Burnik, T. S. Kolnik, and P. Pucer, "The Applicability of COBIT Processes Representation Structure for Quality Improvement in Healthcare: A Delphi Study," Int. J. Qual. Heal. Care, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 577-584, 2020, doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa096.

A. Ghazaleh, Y. Wautelet, M. Kolp, and S. Heng, Integrating Risk Representation at Strategic Level for IT Service Governance: A Comprehensive Framework, vol. 400. Springer International Publishing, 2020.

P. N. Sindhuja, "The Impact of Information Security Initiatives on Supply Chain Robustness and Performance: An Empirical Study," Inf. Comput. Secur., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 365-391, 2021, doi: 10.1108/ICS-07-2020-0128.

G. C. Dias, C. T. Hernandez, and U. R. De Oliveira, "Supply Chain Risk Management and Risk Ranking in the Automotive Industry," Gest. e Prod., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1-21, 2020, doi: 10.1590/0104-530X3800-20.

I. Y. Wuni, G. Q. P. Shen, and A. T. Mahmud, "Critical Risk Factors in the Application of Modular Integrated Construction: A Systematic Review," Int. J. Constr. Manag., pp. 1-15, 2019, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1613212.

A. Majumdar, S. K. Sinha, and K. Govindan, "Prioritising Risk Mitigation Strategies for Environmentally Sustainable Clothing Supply Chains: Insights from Selected Organisational Theories," Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 28, pp. 543-555, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.021.

M. Xu et al., "Supply Chain Sustainability Risk and Assessment," J. Clean. Prod., vol. 225, pp. 1-11, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.307.

A. C. Amorim, M. M. Silva, R. Pereira, and M. Goní§alves, "Using agile methodologies for adopting COBIT," Information Systems, 2020, doi: 10.1016/

W. Sardjono, W. Priatna, E. Lusia, G. R. Putra, and H. Juwitasary, "Information Technology Implementation and Its Performance in Educational Institution Using The Cobit Framework", ICIC Express Letters Part B: Applications, Vol. 12, No. 12, pp. 1091-1099, 2021, doi: 10.24507/icicelb.12.12.1091.

M. R. Jalilvand, J. Khazaei Pool, M. Khodadadi, and M. Sharifi, "Information Technology Competency and Knowledge Management in the Hospitality Industry Service Supply Chain," Tour. Rev., vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 872-884, 2019, doi: 10.1108/TR-04-2018-0054.

E. Y. Sari, A. D. Guritno, and A. C. Sukartiko, “Risk Assessment on Supply Chain of the Geographical Indication Granulated Coconut Sugar in Kulon Progo Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 236-243, 2021, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.11.1.7923.

Y. U. Chandra, S. Karya, and M. Hendrawaty, “Decision Support Systems for Customer to Buy Products with an Integration of Reviews and Comments from Marketplace E-Commerce Sites in Indonesia: A Proposed Model,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1171-1176, 2019, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.9.4.6505.

M. A. Basset, M. Gunasekaran, M. Mohamed, and N. Chilamkurti, "A Framework for Risk Assessment, Management and Evaluation: Economic Tool for Quantifying Risks in Supply Chain," Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 90, pp. 489-502, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2018.08.035.

K. Govindan, P. C. Jha, V. Agarwal, and J. D. Darbari, "Environmental Management Partner Selection for Reverse Supply Chain Collaboration: A Sustainable Approach," J. Environ. Manage., vol. 236, pp. 784-797, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.088.

A. Qazi, A. Dickson, J. Quigley, and B. Gaudenzi, "Supply Chain Risk Network Management: A Bayesian Belief Network and Expected Utility Based Approach for Managing Supply Chain Risks," Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 196, pp. 24-42, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.11.008.

A. Kumar, E. K. Zavadskas, S. K. Mangla, V. Agrawal, K. Sharma, and D. Gupta, "When Risks Need Attention: Adoption of Green Supply Chain Initiatives in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 3554-3576, 2019, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1543969.

Y. P. Tsang, K. L. Choy, C. H. Wu, G. T. S. Ho, C. H. Y. Lam, and P. S. Koo, "An Internet of Things (Iot)-Based Risk Monitoring System for Managing Cold Supply Chain Risks," Ind. Manag. Data Syst., vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 1432-1462, 2018, doi: 10.1108/IMDS-09-2017-0384.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).