Analysis of Course Data for Curriculum Review and Improvement

Youngseok Lee (1), Jungwon Cho (2)
(1) Department of Computer Education, Seoul National University of Education, 96 Seochojungang-ro, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
(2) Department of Computer Education, Jeju National University, 102 Jejudaehakno, Jeju-si, Jeju-do, Republic of Korea
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Lee, Youngseok, and Jungwon Cho. “Analysis of Course Data for Curriculum Review and Improvement”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 13, no. 3, June 2023, pp. 1094-9, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.13.3.18462.
Analyzing class data collected by educational institutions is imperative for deriving measures to improve the curriculum. Data analysis can identify students' grades and learning behaviors; on this basis, students' learning effectiveness and satisfaction can be improved by promoting curriculum improvement. In this study, it was possible to derive students' learning patterns, key factors, and process improvement plans necessary for the composition and development of the curriculum. The analysis results according to the type of course taken showed that class interest was highly related to learning content understanding, and class understanding had a weak relationship. In addition, it was found that interest in the class and understanding of the contents were important when learners took the course, and the difficulty of the assignment was found to have no relationship with other factors except for the number of assignments. Cluster analysis based on cross-analysis of the subject showed that the subject's difficulty, importance, and association all play an important role, and actual academic grades do not affect it. Interest in the subject and understanding of the contents of the class were crucial factors, and the number and difficulty of tasks did not have a significant impact. Based on these analysis results, providing a quantitative basis for expanding learners' participation in curriculum improvement is possible. These analyses and improvements must be carried out continuously, and the introduction of new data and technologies enables more effective curriculum improvement by performing more detailed and accurate analyses.

Z. A. Pardos and W. Jiang, “Designing for serendipity in a university course recommendation system” in Proc. Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp. 350-359, 2020 doi: 10.1145/3375462.3375524.

B. Mondal et al., “A course recommendation system based on grades” in international conference on computer science, engineering and applications (ICCSEA), IEEE, pp. 1-5 2020 doi: 10.1109/ICCSEA49143.2020.9132845.

D. B. Guruge et al., "The state of the art in methodologies of course recommender systems—A review of recent research," Data, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 18, 2021, doi: 10.3390/data6020018.

N. W. Rahayu et al., “‘A systematic review of ontology use in E-Learning recommender system,’ Computers and Education,” Artif. Intell., p. 100047, 2022.

B. T. M. Wong, "Learning analytics in higher education: An analysis of case studies," Asian Assoc. Open Universities J., vol. 12, no. 1, 21-40, 2017, doi: 10.1108/AAOUJ-01-2017-0009.

S. Dhelim, et al., "A survey on personality-aware recommendation systems," Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 2409-2454, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-10063-7.

W. Xiao et al., "A survey on educational data mining methods used for predicting students' performance," Eng. Rep., vol. 4, no. 5, p. e12482, 2022, doi: 10.1002/eng2.12482.

M. Hooda, et al., "Integrating LA and EDM for improving students Success in higher Education using FCN algorithm," Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 1-12, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/7690103.

E. Alyahyan and D. Dí¼ÅŸtegí¶r, "Predicting academic success in higher education: Literature review and best practices," Int. J. Educ. Technol. Higher Educ., vol. 17, pp. 1-21, 2020.

R. Jayashanka et al., "Technology enhanced learning analytics dashboard in higher education," Electron. J. e-Learning, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. pp151-pp170, 2022, doi: 10.34190/ejel.20.2.2189.

D. Ifenthaler and J. Y.-K. Yau, "Analytics for supporting teaching success in higher education: A systematic review," IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). IEEE, 2022, doi: 10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766734.

M. YaÄŸcı, “Educational data mining: Prediction of students' academic performance using machine learning algorithms,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 11, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40561-022-00192-z.

B. Dietz-Uhler and J. E. Hurn, "Using learning analytics to predict (and improve) student success: A faculty perspective," J. Interact. Online Learn., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 17-26, 2013.

H. Karbasian and A. Johri, "Insights for curriculum development: Identifying emerging data science topics through analysis of Q&A communities" in Proc. 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 192-198, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3328778.3366817.

Y.-E. Park, "A data-driven approach for discovery of the latest research trends in higher education for business by leveraging advanced technology and big data," J. Educ. Bus., vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 291-298, 2021, doi: 10.1080/08832323.2020.1821344.

R. F. Kizilcec and D. Davis, "Learning Analytics Education: A case study, review of current programs, and recommendations for instructors" in Practicable Learning Analytics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 133-154, 2023, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-27646-0_8.

R. D. De Veaux, et al., "Curriculum guidelines for undergraduate programs in data science," Annu. Rev. Stat. Its Appl., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 15-30, 2017, doi: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-053930.

C. Fischer, et al., "Mining big data in education: Affordances and challenges," Rev. Res. Educ., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 130-160, 2020, doi: 10.3102/0091732X20903304.

M. Buker and G. Niklason, "Curriculum evaluation & improvement model," J. Health Admin. Educ., vol. 36, no. 1, p. 37, 2019.

Y. Yamamoto, et al., "Increasing the sensitivity of a personalized educational data mining method for curriculum composition" in Emerging Issues in Smart Learning. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 201-208, 2015, doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-44188-6_28.

Y. Huang and J. Zhu, "A personalized English learning material recommendation system based on knowledge graph," Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 16, no. 11, p. 160, 2021, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v16i11.23317.

M. A. Pilotti, O. J. El-Moussa, & H. M. Abdelsalam, “Measuring the impact of the pandemic on female and male students’ learning in a society in transition: A must for sustainable education,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. p. 3148, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14063148.

A. P. Trassi, S. J. Leonard, L. D. Rodrigues, J. A. Rodas, & F. H. Santos, “Mediating factors of statistics anxiety in university students: a systematic review and meta”analysis,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1512, no. 1, pp. 76-97, 2022, doi: 10.1111/nyas.14746.

J. Zhang, B. Hao, B. Chen, C. Li, H. Chen, & J. Sun, “Hierarchical reinforcement learning for course recommendation in MOOCs,” In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 33, no. 01, pp. 435-442, 2019, doi: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301435.

P. Fidalgo, J. Thormann, O. Kulyk, & J. A. Lencastre, “Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study,” International journal of educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1-18, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00194-2.

H. Zeineddine, U. Braendle, & A. Farah, “Enhancing prediction of student success: Automated machine learning approach,” Computers & Electrical Engineering, vol. 89, p. 106903, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106903.

F. Han, & R. A. Ellis, “Identifying consistent patterns of quality learning discussions in blended learning,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 40, pp. 12-19, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.002.

R. Murphy, & G. Wyness, “Minority Report: the impact of predicted grades on university admissions of disadvantaged groups,” Education Economics, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 333-350, 2020, doi: 10.1080/09645292.2020.1761945.

J. Neroni, C. Meijs, H. J. Gijselaers, P. A. Kirschner, & R. H. de Groot,

“Learning strategies and academic performance in distance education,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 73, pp. 1-7, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2019.04.007.

J. L. Rastrollo-Guerrero, J. A. Gómez-Pulido, & A. Durí¡n-Domí­nguez, “Analyzing and predicting students’ performance by means of machine learning: A review,” Applied sciences, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 1042, 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10031042.

K. M. Jones, “Learning analytics and higher education: a proposed model for establishing informed consent mechanisms to promote student privacy and autonomy,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-22, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0155-0.

Y. Lee, & J. Cho, “Crosstabs Analysis of ICT lecture for Welfare-Technology Course Recommendation,” International Information Institute (Tokyo). Information, vol 20, no. 2B), p. 1115, 2017.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).