DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.3.18654

Sustainability of Sugarcane Farms in the Milagro Canton, Ecuador

Carlos Amador-Sacoto (1), Salomón Helfgott-Lerner (2)
(1) Universidad Agraria del Ecuador, Av. 28 de Julio, Guayaquil 090104, Ecuador
(2) Universidad Nacional Agraria la Molina, Av. La Molina s/n, Lima, Perú
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
[1]
C. Amador-Sacoto and S. Helfgott-Lerner, “Sustainability of Sugarcane Farms in the Milagro Canton, Ecuador”, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 837–843, Jun. 2023.
Citation Format :
The objective of the research was to evaluate the sustainability of sugarcane cultivation in the Milagro Canton of the Guayas Province in Ecuador, addressing the economic, ecological, and social dimensions, according to the Multicriteria Analysis methodology. A survey was applied to a representative probabilistic sample of 277 sugarcane growers from a target population of 422 agricultural production units dedicated to sugarcane in the Milagro Canton. In the economic dimension, the economic indicator (EconI) was 1.64 (below the referential value of 2 proposed as sustainable by the methodology) due to limitations in the diversification of production, number of marketing channels, dependence on external inputs and access to credit, despite presenting an acceptable planted area, productivity, and profitability. In the ecological dimension, the conservation of soil life and avoiding its degradation was deficient, the management of limited biodiversity, the nutrition of the crop mainly with chemical fertilizers and degradation factors, the irrigation system and burning practices are susceptible to improvement (Environmentally Sustainable Index [ESI] of 1.25). In the social dimension, the Social Indicator (SI) of 3.1 was due to values of Satisfaction of basic needs, acceptability of the production system, social integration, and acceptable ecological awareness. The results indicate that sugarcane cultivation in the Milagro Canton is not sustainable because the General Sustainability Index (GSI) was 1.99, less than 2, and not all the indicators exceeded said value.

INEC, “Encuesta de Superficie y Producción Agropecuaria Continua (ESPAC) Boletí­n tí©cnico,” 2022.

J. Prasara-A and S. H. Gheewala, “Sustainability of sugarcane cultivation: case study of selected sites in north-eastern Thailand,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 134, no. Part B, pp. 613-622, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2015.09.029.

S. Vieira et al., “Sustainability of sugarcane lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment for the production of bioethanol,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 299, p. 122635, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2019.122635.

S. J. de Andrade, J. Cristale, F. S. Silva, G. Julií£o Zocolo, and M. R. R. Marchi, “Contribution of sugar-cane harvesting season to atmospheric contamination by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Araraquara city, Southeast Brazil,” Atmos. Environ., vol. 44, no. 24, pp. 2913-2919, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2010.04.026.

Tenelanda Masache Cristina Rocí­o, “Determinación de los coeficientes de cultivo ‘kc’ para el riego de la caña de azíºcar (Saccharum officinarum L.) en dos sistemas de plantación,” pp. 1-14, 2017.

J. A. Garcí­a-Garcí­a, A. Reding-Bernal, and J. C. López-Alvarenga, “Cí¡lculo del tamaño de la muestra en investigación en educación mí©dica,” Investig. en Educ. Mí©dica, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 217-224, 2013, doi: 10.1016/s2007-5057(13)72715-7.

R. E. Duarte Ayala, A. R. Rodrí­guez-Orozco, H. Ruiz Vega, and J. J. Alejandre Garcí­a, “Asthma control from primary care with a gender and family focus,” Aten. Primaria, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 583-584, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2020.06.013.

S. J. Sarandón, M. S. Zuluaga, R. Cieza, C. Gómez, and L. Janjetic, “Evaluación de la sustentabilidad de sistemas agrí­colas de fincas en misiones, argentina, mediante el uso de indicadores,” Agroecologí­a, vol. 1, no. March 2014, pp. 19-28, 2006.

V. F. Painii-Montero, O. Santillí¡n-Muñoz, M. Barcos-Arias, D. Portalanza, A. Durigon, and F. R. Garcí©s-Fiallos, “Towards indicators of sustainable development for soybeans productive units: a multicriteria perspective for the Ecuadorian coast,” Ecol. Indic., vol. 119, p. 106800, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2020.106800.

A. c, A. Piernik, and A. Nienartowicz, “Performance indicators used to study the sustainability of farms. Case study from Poland,” Ecol. Indic., vol. 99, pp. 51-60, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2018.11.067.

A. Leoneti, A. Nirazawa, and S. Oliveira, “Proposta de í­ndice de sustentabilidade como instrumento de autoavaliaí§í£o para micro e pequenas empresas (MPEs),” REGE - Rev. Gestí£o, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 349-361, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.REGE.2016.09.003.

G. P. T. J. de Garcí­a et al., “Sustainability of livestock farms: The case of the district of Moyobamba, Peru,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 2, p. e13153, 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E13153.

R. F. Sitompul and D. A. P. Sinaga, “Sustainability Approach of Site Selection for Renewables Deployment in Indonesian Rural Electrical Grids,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 2518-2525, 2020, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.10.6.13762.

L. Yang et al., “Reconciling productivity, profitability and sustainability of small-holder sugarcane farms: A combined life cycle and data envelopment analysis,” Agric. Syst., vol. 199, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103392.

D. Yu, Y. Cao, M. Cao, and H. Xu, “Enhancing China’s ecological sustainability through more optimized investment,” Glob. Ecol. Conserv., vol. 34, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.GECCO.2022.E02049.

W. Sawaengsak and S. H. Gheewala, “Analysis of social and socio-economic impacts of sugarcane production: A case study in Nakhon Ratchasima province of Thailand,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 142, pp. 1169-1175, 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.08.148.

A. Volkov, M. Morkunas, T. Balezentis, and D. Streimikiene, “Are agricultural sustainability and resilience complementary notions? Evidence from the North European agriculture,” Land use policy, vol. 112, p. 105791, 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2021.105791.

Iñiguez - Iñiguez Andrea, L. Valle-Carrión, M. Gonzí¡lez-Torres, and W.- Ochoa-Moreno3., “Revista Amazónica Ciencia y Tecnologí­a,” Rev. Amaz. Cienc. y Tecnol., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 172-183, 2018.

H. Dieleman, “Urban agriculture in Mexico City; balancing between ecological, economic, social and symbolic value,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 163, pp. S156-S163, 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.01.082.

T. Silalertruksa and S. H. Gheewala, “The environmental and socio-economic impacts of bio-ethanol production in Thailand,” Energy Procedia, vol. 9, pp. 35-43, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.09.005.

X. Ma, J. Zhu, W. Yan, and C. Zhao, “Assessment of soil conservation services of four river basins in Central Asia under global warming scenarios,” Geoderma, vol. 375, p. 114533, 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2020.114533.

M. Kattwinkel, R. Biedermann, and M. Kleyer, “Temporary conservation for urban biodiversity,” Biol. Conserv., vol. 144, no. 9, pp. 2335-2343, 2011, doi: 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2011.06.012.

A. Semin et al., “Sustainable condition of the agricultural sector’s environmental, economic, and social components from the perspective of open innovation,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-25, 2021, doi: 10.3390/JOITMC7010074.

Desniorita, N. Nazir, Novelina, and K. Sayuti, “Sustainable design of biorefinery processes on cocoa pod: Optimization of pectin extraction process with variations of pH, temperature, and time,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 2104-2113, 2019, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.9.6.10670.

M. Galdos, O. Cavalett, J. E. A. Seabra, L. A. H. Nogueira, and A. Bonomi, “Trends in global warming and human health impacts related to Brazilian sugarcane ethanol production considering black carbon emissions,” Appl. Energy, vol. 104, pp. 576-582, 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2012.11.002.

M. J. P. Lampreia-Dos Santos and N. Ahmad, “Sustainability of European agricultural holdings,” J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 358-364, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2020.04.001.

N. H. Afgan, M. G. Carvalho, and N. V Hovanov, “Energy system assessment with sustainability indicators,” Energy Policy, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 603-612, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00045-8.

L. Tennhardt, G. Lazzarini, R. Weisshaidinger, and C. Schader, “Do environmentally-friendly cocoa farms yield social and economic co-benefits?,” Ecol. Econ., vol. 197, 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2022.107428.

P. Chopin, J. Tirolien, and J. M. Blazy, “Ex-ante sustainability assessment of cleaner banana production systems,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 139, pp. 15-24, 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.08.036.

J. A. Gonzabay Reyes, “Estudios de Factibilidad Financiera: Desarrollo de 40 hectí¡reas de cacao (Theobrama cacao L.) Tipo Nacional, en Clementina, cantón Santa Elena,” 2012.

H. Chen, C. Tan, Z. Lin, and T. Wu, “Classification of different liquid milk by near-infrared spectroscopy and ensemble modeling,” Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., vol. 251, p. 119460, 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.SAA.2021.119460.

F. S. Koij and J. Saba, “Using Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis to Group Lines and Determine Important Traits in White Bean,” Procedia Environ. Sci., vol. 29, pp. 38-40, 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.PROENV.2015.07.145.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).