Numerical Study of Wind Flow Behavior Around High-Rise Buildings Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

Arga Yudhistira (1), Prasanti Widyasih Sarli (2), Syarie Fatunnisa (3), Alfredo Fikri Akbar (4), Yongky Sanjaya (5), Doni Priambodo (6)
(1) Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesa No. 10 Lb, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesa No. 10 Lb, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia
(3) Laboratory for Aerodynamics, Aeroelastic, and Aeroacoustics Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency, South Tangerang, 15314, Banten, Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesa No. 10 Lb, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia
(5) Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesa No. 10 Lb, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia
(6) Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesa No. 10 Lb, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Yudhistira, Arga, et al. “Numerical Study of Wind Flow Behavior Around High-Rise Buildings Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 14, no. 3, June 2024, pp. 1115-2, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.14.3.18732.
The development of civil construction technology in Indonesia is progressing along with the rise in high-rise building construction. The emergence of high-rise buildings has altered wind flow characteristics, leading to phenomena that can directly impact surrounding structures. One of the observable phenomena is the wind speed amplification caused by the narrowing of the wind flow section, known as the Venturi effect. This study aims to compare the outcomes of two Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods—Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and Large Eddy Simulation (LES)—against experimental results. The study employs a model of four buildings of similar height and symmetrical positioning, with a 72 mm passage width, to verify numerical simulations against experimental data. The RANS method yields a maximum wind speed amplification of 14.9% along the passage's centerline, which remains below the experimental prediction of 25.5% in Zone A. Conversely, the LES results show a higher wind speed amplification, reaching 40.2%, surpassing the experimental findings. Nevertheless, LES identifies a similar location for wind speed amplification observed in Zone A. Additionally, CFD simulations were conducted to analyze the effects of passage width, revealing that a passage width of 54 mm produces the highest wind speed amplification, with a ratio value of passage width to building influence scale (L/S) of 0.481. Further research on building model scale may be necessary to verify CFD accuracy compared to the actual scale. However, such simulations demand exceedingly high computational resources with current technology.

BNPB, (Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana), "Risiko Bencana Indonesia," 2019.

P. Sarli, M. Abdillah and A. Sakti, "Relationship between wind incidents and wind-induced damage to construction in West Java, Indonesia," in Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 592 012001, 2020. doi : 10.1088/1755-1315/592/1/012001.

S. Nagar, R. Raj and N. Dev, "Proximity effects between two plus-plan shaped high-rise buildings on mean and RMS pressure coefficients," Scientia Iranica A, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 990-1005, 2022. doi:/10.28991/cej-2021-03091760.

A. Kumar and R. Raj, "Study of Pressure Distribution on an Irregular Octagonal Plan Oval-Shape Building Using CFD," Civil Engineering Journal, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1787-1805, 2021. doi: 10.28991/cej-2021-03091760.

T. Stathopoulos and R. Storms, "Wind Environmental Conditions in Passages Between Buildings," Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 24, pp. 19-31, 1986. doi: 10.1016/0167-6105(86)90070-X.

B. Blocken, T. Stathopoulos, F. ASCE and J. Carmeliet, "Wind environmental conditions in passages between two long narrow perpendicular buildings," Journal of Aerospace Engineering, pp. 280-287, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106583.

Z. Liu, Z. Yu, X. Chen, R. Cao and F. Zhu, "An investigation on external airflow around low-rise building with various roof types:," Building and Environment, vol. 169, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106583.

S. Hassanli, K. Chauhan, M. Zhao and K. C. Kwok, "Application of through-building openings for wind energy harvesting in built environment," Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 184, pp. 445-455, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2018.11.030.

B. Blocken, J. Carmeliet and T. Stathopoulos, "CFD evaluation of wind speed conditions in passages between parallel buildings—effect of wall-function roughness modifications for the atmospheric boundary layer flow," Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 95, pp. 941-962, 2007. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/930/1/012044.

Y. Sanjaya, D. Priambodo, P. W. Sarli and H. D. Setio, "The effect of street canyon width towards wind flow in between high-rise buildings," 4th International Conference on Civil Engineering Research, vol. 930, 2020. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/930/1/012044.

D. Priambodo, Y. Sanjaya, P. W. Sarli and H. D. Setio, "Experimental Studies of Wind Flow Inside a Street Canyon Between High-Rise Buildings with Angle of Attack Modifications," International Journal on Advance Science Engineering Information Technology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 2035-2043, 2020. doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.10.5.12806.

Y. Sanjaya, D. Priambodo and P. W. Sarli, "Pemodelan Numerik Aliran Angin di Sekitar Gedung Tinggi Menggunakan Metode RANS Standard K-E," Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 153-160, 2022. doi: 10.14710/mkts.v28i1.37375.

H. C. Lim, T. G. Thomas and I. P. Castro, "Flow Around a Cube in a Turbulent Boundary Layer: LES and Experiment," Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 97, pp. 96-109, 2009. oi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2009.01.001.

A. M. Aly and H. Gol-Zaroudi, "Peak pressures on low-rise buildings: CFD LES versus full-scale and wind tunnel measurements," Wind and Structures, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 99-117, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.finmec.2022.100134.

R. Cao, Z. Yu, Z. Liu, X. Chen and F. Zhu, "An investigation of snow drifting on low-sloped gable roofs: Wind-tunnel tests and CFD simulations," Cold Regions Science and Technology, vol. 183, no. 103227, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106583.

F.-B. Chen, X.-L. Wang, Y. Zhao, Y.-B. Li, Q.-S. Li, P. Xiang and Y. Li, "Study ofWind Loads and Wind Speed Amplifications on High-Rise Building with Opening by Numerical Simulation and Wind Tunnel Test," Hindawi Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2020, 2020. doi: 10.1155/2020/8850688.

Y. Abu-Zidan, P. Mendis and T. Gunawardena, "Impact of atmospheric boundary layer inhomogeneity in CFD simulations of tall buildings," Heliyon, vol. 6, no. e04274, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04274.

C. A. Ruiz, I. Kalkman and B. Blocken, "Aerodynamic design optimization of ducted openings through high-rise buildings for wind energy harvesting," Building and Environment, vol. 202, no. 108028, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108028.

Y. Tominaga and M. Shirzadi, "RANS CFD modeling of the flow around a thin windbreak fence with various porosities: Validation using wind tunnel measurements," Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 230, no. 105176, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2022.105176.

Y. Abu-Zidan, P. Mendis and T. Gunawardena, "Optimising the computational domain size in CFD simulations of tall buildings," Heliyon, vol. 7, no. e06723, 2021. doi : 10.1007/s12273-018-0459-3.

Y. Tominaga, "AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings," Journal of Wind Engineering and INdustrial Aerodynamics, vol. 96, pp. 1749-1761, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.058.

D. Kasana, D. Tayal, D. Choudhary, R. Raj, R. K. Meena and S. Anbukumar, "Evaluation of aerodynamic effects on a tall building with various cross-section shapes having equal area," Forces In Mechanics, vol. 9, no. 100134, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.finmec.2022.100134.

B. Blocken, "LES over RANS in building simulation for outdoor and indoor aplication: A foregone conslusion?," Building Simulation, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 821-870, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106747.

M. Shirzadi, P. A. Mirzaei and Y. Tominaga1, "CFD analysis of cross-ventilation flow in a group of generic buildings: Comparison between steady RANS, LES and wind tunnel experiments," BUILD SIMUL, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2022.105176.

X. Zheng, H. Montazeri and B. Blocken, "CFD simulations of wind flow and mean surface pressure for buildings with balconies: Comparison of RANS and LES," Building And Environment, vol. 173, no. 106747, 2020. doi: 10.24200/sci.2021.55928.4484.

Y. Li, C. Li, Q.-S. Li, Q. Song, X. Huang and Y.-G. Li, "Aerodynamic performance of CAARC standard tall building model by various corner chamfers," Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 202, no. 104197, 2020. doi:10.1016/J.JWEIA.2020.104197.

N. Gaur and R. Raj, "Aerodynamic mitigation by corner modification on square model under," Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2021.06.007.

N. Assainar and S. K. Dalui, "Aerodynamic analysis of pentagon shaped tall buildings," Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s42107-020-00296-2.

P. Sanyal and S. K. Dalui, "Comparison of aerodynamic coefcients of various types of Y-plan-shaped tall buildings," Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s42107-020-00265-9.

S. Pal, R. Raj and S. Anbukumar, "Comparative study of wind induced mutual interference effects on square and fish-plan shape tall buildings," Sadhana, vol. 46, no. 86, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s12046-021-01592-6.

R. Raj, T. Rana, T. Anchalia and U. Khola, "Numerical Study of Wind Excited Action on H Plan-Shaped Tall Building," International Journal on Emerging Technologies , pp. 591-605, 2020. doi:10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-02-06.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).