DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.14.1.18895

Factors Affecting BIM (Building Information Modeling) Utilization Based on Stakeholder Perceptions in Indonesia

Anjar Primasetra (1), Dewi Larasati (2), Surjamanto Wonorahardjo (3)
(1) Department of Architecture, School of Architecture Planning and Policy Development, Institut Teknologi Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
(2) Department of Architecture, School of Architecture Planning and Policy Development, Institut Teknologi Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
(3) Department of Architecture, School of Architecture Planning and Policy Development, Institut Teknologi Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Primasetra, Anjar, et al. “Factors Affecting BIM (Building Information Modeling) Utilization Based on Stakeholder Perceptions in Indonesia ”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 14, no. 1, Feb. 2024, pp. 259-67, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.14.1.18895.
Citation Format :
Implementing Building Information Modeling (BIM) in Indonesian construction can potentially optimize material resources, labor, and energy efficiency. However, several challenges hinder its effectiveness, including proficiency, standards, policies, infrastructure, and BIM access. This research aims to identify and address factors impeding BIM implementation, providing recommendations for stakeholders to impact the construction industry positively. Conducted through a quantitative approach, the study gathers data online via questionnaires distributed among BIM stakeholders, encompassing practitioners, academics, and government representatives. The data is meticulously analyzed using ANOVA, factor analysis, and factor rotation techniques. The research identifies five key factors contributing to BIM issues in Indonesia based on eigenvalues exceeding 1.0. These factors encompass limited BIM access, challenges in proficiency and mastery, incomplete data on components and materials, inaccessible BIM infrastructure, and restricted collaboration across domains. The users' expectations center around BIM dissemination and standardization, easy data accessibility, establishing a robust Indonesian BIM community, affordability and accessibility of BIM infrastructure, and user-friendly BIM platforms. The anticipated outcomes of this research offer practical implications for the construction industry. These include recommendations for enhanced BIM training, proposing government funding to facilitate companies in acquiring necessary BIM software and hardware, and promoting BIM knowledge through seminars. The overarching goal is to address the identified challenges, fostering efficient BIM utilization in the Indonesian construction industry.

W. Lu, C. C. Lai, and T. Tse, Big data for construction cost management. 2018. doi: 10.1201/9781351172325-6.

X. Wang, BIM Handbook: A guide to Building Information Modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors, vol. 12, no. 3. 2012. doi: 10.5130/ajceb.v12i3.2749.

Y. Chen, D. Zhu, Z. Tian, and Q. Guo, “Factors influencing construction time performance of prefabricated house building: A multi-case study,” Habitat Int., vol. 131, no. January 2022, p. 102731, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102731.

A. Momeet, N. A. Memon, S. Nazeem, F. A. Shaikh, and M. Jamali, “Reasons of poor performance of construction projects of Pakistan,” Trop. Sci. J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 2022.

A. Primasetra and D. Larasati, “Development of the Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) Method in calculating Embodied Energy Materials on Residential Buildings,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 738, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/738/1/012014.

Y. Chen, X. Cai, J. Li, W. Zhang, and Z. Liu, “The values and barriers of Building Information Modeling (BIM) implementation combination evaluation in smart building energy and efficiency,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 96–111, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.075.

C. Panteli, A. Kylili, and P. A. Fokaides, “Building information modelling applications in smart buildings: From design to commissioning and beyond A critical review,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 265, p. 121766, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121766.

T. Wang and H. M. Chen, “Integration of building information modeling and project management in construction project life cycle,” Autom. Constr., vol. 150, no. February, p. 104832, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104832.

J. Cui, “Integration of Life Cycle Assessment within Building Information Modeling Environment Integration of Life Cycle Assessment within Building Information Modeling Environment,” KTH Royal Institute of Technology School of Architecture and The Built Environment, 2020.

V. W. Tam, Y. Zhou, L. Shen, and K. N. Le, “Optimal BIM and LCA integration approach for embodied environmental impact assessment,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 385, no. May 2022, p. 135605, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135605.

F. Khosrowshahi and Y. Arayici, “Roadmap for implementation of BIM in the UK construction industry,” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 610–635, 2012, doi: 10.1108/09699981211277531.

O. I. Olanrewaju, A. F. Kineber, N. Chileshe, and D. J. Edwards, “Modelling the relationship between Building Information Modelling (BIM) implementation barriers, usage and awareness on building project lifecycle,” Build. Environ., vol. 207, no. November 2021, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108556.

G. Burgess, M. Jones, and K. Muir, “BIM in the UK house building industry: opportunities and barriers to adoption,” Cambridge Univ. Cambridge, no. March, pp. 1–8, 2018, doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.19611.92962.

J. L. Hao et al., “Carbon emission reduction in prefabrication construction during materialization stage: A BIM-based life-cycle assessment approach,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 723, p. 137870, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137870.

Y. Liu, M. Li, B. C. L. Wong, C. M. Chan, J. C. P. Cheng, and V. J. L. Gan, “BIM-BVBS integration with openBIM standards for automatic prefabrication of steel reinforcement,” Autom. Constr., vol. 125, no. March, p. 103654, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103654.

S. Jang and G. Lee, “Process, productivity, and economic analyses of BIM–based multi-trade prefabrication—A case study,” Autom. Constr., vol. 89, no. December 2017, pp. 86–98, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.035.

N. Siniak, S. Źróbek, V. Nikolaiev, and ..., “Building information modeling for housing renovation-example for ukraine,” Real Estate, 2019.

H. Sarvari, D. W. M. Chan, M. Rakhshanifar, N. Banaitiene, and A. Banaitis, “Evaluating the impact of building information modeling (BIM) on mass house building projects,” Buildings, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.3390/buildings10020035.

A. Baldrich Aragó, J. Roig Hernando, F. J. Llovera Saez, and J. Coll Bertran, “Quantity surveying and BIM 5D. Its implementation and analysis based on a case study approach in Spain,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 44, no. August, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103234.

B. W. S. Rayendra, “Studi Aplikasi Teknologi Building Information Modeling Untuk Pra-Konstruksi,” Simp. Nas. RAPI XIII, pp. 14–21, 2014.

B. Liu, M. Wang, Y. Zhang, R. Liu, and A. Wang, “Review and Prospect of BIM Policy in China,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 245, no. 2, 2017, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/245/2/022021.

M. Xie, Y. Qiu, Y. Liang, Y. Zhou, Z. Liu, and G. Zhang, “Policies, applications, barriers and future trends of building information modeling technology for building sustainability and informatization in China,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 7107–7126, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.008.

J. Li, N. Li, J. Peng, H. Cui, and Z. Wu, “A review of currently applied building information modeling tools of constructions in China,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 201, pp. 358–368, 2018.

Z. Ding, S. Liu, L. Luo, and L. Liao, “A building information modeling-based carbon emission measurement system for prefabricated residential buildings during the materialization phase,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 264, p. 121728, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121728.

J. Xu, Q. Zhang, Y. Teng, and W. Pan, “Integrating IoT and BIM for tracking and visualising embodied carbon of prefabricated buildings,” Build. Environ., vol. 242, no. January, p. 110492, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110492.

J. Xu, Y. Teng, W. Pan, and Y. Zhang, “BIM-integrated LCA to automate embodied carbon assessment of prefabricated buildings,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 374, no. April, p. 133894, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133894.

M. S. Al-Mohammad et al., “Factors affecting BIM implementation: evidence from countries with different income levels,” Constr. Innov., no. April, 2022, doi: 10.1108/CI-11-2021-0217.

A. F. Van Roy and A. Firdaus, “Building Information Modelling in Indonesia: Knowledge, Implementation and Barriers,” J. Constr. Dev. Ctries., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 199–217, 2020, doi:10.21315/jcdc2020.25.2.8.

N. Bui, C. Merschbrock, and B. E. Munkvold, “A Review of Building Information Modelling for Construction in Developing Countries,” Procedia Eng., vol. 164, no. 1877, pp. 487–494, 2016, doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.649.

Y. Hanifah, “Awareness dan Pemanfaatan BIM : Studi Eksplorasi,” Temu Ilm. IPLBI 2016, no. August, pp. 49–54, 2016.

C. Eastman, P. Teicholz, R. Sack, and K. Liston, BIM Handbook, a Guide to Building Information Modelling 2nd ed. 2011.

Z. S. Chen, M. D. Zhou, K. S. Chin, A. Darko, X. J. Wang, and W. Pedrycz, “Optimized decision support for BIM maturity assessment,” Autom. Constr., vol. 149, no. September 2022, p. 104808, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104808.

K. Olofsson Hallén, M. Forsman, and A. Eriksson, “Interactions between Human, Technology and Organization in Building Information Modelling (BIM) - A scoping review of critical factors for the individual user,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., vol. 97, no. March, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103480.

A. Koutamanis, “Dimensionality in BIM: Why BIM cannot have more than four dimensions?,” Autom. Constr., vol. 114, no. March, p. 103153, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103153.

A. Zita, “ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Project management in office : BIM Project management in office : BIM implementation,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 196, pp. 840–847, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.083.

N. Zainon, F. A. Mohd-Rahim, and H. Salleh, “The Rise of BIM in Malaysia and Its Impact Towards Quantity Surveying Practices,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 66, pp. 4–11, 2016, doi:10.1051/matecconf/20166600060.

A. Venkataraman and R. Kannan.M, “Whole Building Energy Analysis using BIM,” Int. Confrence Adv. Civ. Eng., no. September, 2013.

X. Pan, A. Mateen Khan, S. M. Eldin, F. Aslam, S. Kashif Ur Rehman, and M. Jameel, “BIM adoption in sustainability, energy modelling and implementing using ISO 19650: A review,” Ain Shams Eng. J., no. xxxx, p. 102252, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2023.102252.

A. Primasetra, D. Larasati, and S. Zuraida, “BIM Implementation on Design Phase Toward Low Embodied Energy Apartment: Comparative Study on 3 Alternatives Architectural Wall Materials,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 738, no. 1, 2021, doi:10.1088/1755-1315/738/1/012020.

Y. Zhang, X. Jiang, C. Cui, and M. Skitmore, “BIM-based approach for the integrated assessment of life cycle carbon emission intensity and life cycle costs,” Build. Environ., vol. 226, no. 193, p. 109691, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109691.

M. Heydari and G. Heravi, “A BIM-based framework for optimization and assessment of buildings ’ cost and carbon emissions,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 79, no. August, p. 107762, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107762.

D. T. Doan, A. Ghaffarianhoseini, N. Naismith, A. Ghaffarianhoseini, T. Zhang, and J. Tookey, “Examining Green Star certification uptake and its relationship with Building Information Modelling (BIM) adoption in New Zealand,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 250, no. September, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109508.

F. Jalaei and A. Jrade, “Integrating Building Information Modeling (BIM) and energy analysis tools with green building certification system to conceptually design sustainable buildings,” J. Inf. Technol. Constr., vol. 19, pp. 494–519, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s12273-013-0120-0.

Y. Schwartz, S. Eleftheriadis, R. Raslan, and D. Mumovic, “Semantically Enriched BIM Life Cycle Assessment to Enhance Buildings’ Environmental Performance,” CIBSE Tech. Symp. Edinburgh, UK, no. April, p. 14 pages, 2016.

X. juan Li, W. jun Xie, L. Xu, L. lu Li, C. Y. Jim, and T. bing Wei, “Holistic life-cycle accounting of carbon emissions of prefabricated buildings using LCA and BIM,” Energy Build., vol. 266, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112136.

D. Larasati, F. Andini Willis, Y. Hanifah, F. Alfi Agirachman, and S. Suhendri, “Factors that affects maturity level of BIM implementation in Indonesia; case Studies of 5 construction key actors,” Engag. Archit. Sci. Meet. Challenges High. Density 52nd Int. Conf. Archit. Sci. Assoc. RMIT Univ. Aust., pp. 673–681, 2018.

W. Hartono, D. Handayani, and Syafi’i, “Tingkat Kedewasaan Penerapan Bim (Buiding Information Modelling) Pada Kontraktor Jembatan Di Indonesia,” J. Ris. Rekayasa Sipil, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 50–61, 2021.

M. Kassem, B. Succar, and N. Dawood, “Building information modeling: analyzing noteworthy publications of eight countries using a knowledge content taxonomy,” Inf. Model., 2015.

M. Kassem, N. Iqbal, and N. Dawood, “A practice oriented BIM framework and workflows,” Comput. Civ. Eng. - Proc. 2013 ASCE Int. Work. Comput. Civ. Eng., no. 696114, pp. 524–532, 2013, doi:10.1061/9780784413029.066.

N. Van Tam, T. N. Diep, N. Quoc Toan, and N. Le Dinh Quy, “Factors affecting adoption of building information modeling in construction projects: A case of Vietnam,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 8, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2021.1918848.

B. Huang et al., “Contribution and obstacle analysis of applying BIM in promoting green buildings,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 278, p. 123946, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123946.

S. Y. Wong and J. Gray, “Barriers to implementing Building Information Modelling (BIM) in the Malaysian construction industry,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 495, no. 1, 2019, doi:10.1088/1757-899X/495/1/012002.

H. Berlian, Cinthia Ayu ; Adhi, Randy Putranto ; Nugroho, “Perbandingan Evisiensi Waktu,Biaya dan Sumber Daya Manusia Antara Metode BIM dan Konvensional (Studi kasus :Perencanaan Gedung 20 Lantai),” J. Karya Tek. Sipil, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 220–229, 2016.

S. Dritsas, “Procedural Building Information Modeling for Digital Fabrication,” Proceedings of the 20th International CAADRIA. cumincad.scix.net, 2015.

J. Hardi and S. Pittard, “If BIM is the solution, what is the problem? A review of the benefits, challenges and key drivers in BIM implementation within the UK construction industry,” J. Build. Surv. Apprais. Valuat., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 366–373, 2015.

S. Lidelöw, S. Engström, and O. Samuelson, “The promise of BIM? Searching for realized benefits in the Nordic architecture, engineering, construction, and operation industries,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 76, no. February, p. 107067, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107067.

Z. Sriyolja, N. Harwin, and K. Yahya, “Barriers to Implement Building Information Modeling (BIM) in Construction Industry: A Critical Review,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 738, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/738/1/012021.

S. Durdyev, M. Ashour, S. Connelly, and A. Mahdiyar, “Barriers to the implementation of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for facility management,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 46, no. November 2021, p. 103736, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103736.

Y. Youkhanna Zaia, S. Mustafa Adam, and F. Heeto Abdulrahman, “Investigating BIM level in Iraqi construction industry,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 101881, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.asej.2022.101881.

D. Migilinskas, V. Popov, V. Juocevicius, and L. Ustinovichius, “The benefits, obstacles and problems of practical bim implementation,” Procedia Eng., vol. 57, no. December, pp. 767–774, 2013, doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.097.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).