DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.6.19441

Evaluation and Optimization Based on Exergy in Kamojang Geothermal Power Plant Unit 3

Bayu Rudiyanto (1), Arief Wicaksono (2), Miftah Hijriawan (3)
(1) Energy Engineering Laboratory, Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jember, 68121, Indonesia
(2) Graduate Program of Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jember, 68121, Indonesia
(3) Graduate Program of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jl. Ir. Sutami 36, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
[1]
B. Rudiyanto, A. Wicaksono, and M. Hijriawan, “Evaluation and Optimization Based on Exergy in Kamojang Geothermal Power Plant Unit 3”, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 2372–2379, Dec. 2023.
Citation Format :
The quality of production well from the Kamojang geothermal power plant unit 3 diminishes annually, whereas there has been a substantial rise in the demand for electrical energy in the region. This research focuses on optimizing the vacuum pressure in the main condenser by employing exergy analysis, a methodology grounded in the principles of the second law of thermodynamics. Exergy analysis offers insights into each system component's exergy efficiency and irreversibility. Furthermore, an energy assessment is conducted to offer insights into each component's energy consumption or utilization. Energy and exergy rates are computed for every state and component within the power plant, encompassing the steam receiving header, separator, demister, turbine, main condenser, inter condenser, after condenser, and cooling tower. The exergy analysis findings reveal that the exergy rate derived from the production well amounts to 95327 kW, generating 52882 kW of electricity and producing a system exergy efficiency of 55.47%. The turbine experiences the highest irreversibility, totaling 12874 kW. Adjustments are made to the main condenser vacuum pressure to optimize the system, aiming to identify the optimal setting that maximizes both exergy efficiency and power output. The optimization outcomes indicate that reducing the vacuum pressure in the main condenser leads to enhanced exergy efficiency and increased power output. The optimal vacuum pressure obtained is 0.1 bar, resulting in the highest exergy efficiency and output power of 57.42% and 54738 kW, respectively, with the lowest irreversibility of 32751.07 kW.

S. W. Yudha, B. Tjahjono, and P. Longhurst, “Unearthing the Dynamics of Indonesia’s Geothermal Energy Development,” Energies, vol. 15, p. 5009, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ en15145009.

P. Sundari, P. S. Darmanto, B. Rudiyanto, and M. Hijriawan, “Utilization of Excess Steam from a Vent Valve in a Geothermal Power Plant,” Energy Nexus, vol. 7, no. July, p. 100114, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100114.

B. Rudiyanto, M. S. Birri, Widjonarko, C. Avian, D. M. Kamal, and M. Hijriawan, “A Genetic Algorithm approach for optimization of geothermal power plant production: Case studies of direct steam cycle in Kamojang,” South African J. Chem. Eng., vol. 45, no. 164, pp. 1-9, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.sajce.2023.04.002.

S. Mohammadzadeh Bina, S. Jalilinasrabady, H. Fujii, and N. A. Pambudi, “Classification of geothermal resources in Indonesia by applying exergy concept,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 93, no. May, pp. 499-506, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.018.

N. Nasruddin, I. Dwi Saputra, T. Mentari, A. Bardow, O. Marcelina, and S. Berlin, “Exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental optimization of the geothermal binary cycle power plant at Ampallas, West Sulawesi, Indonesia,” Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog., vol. 19, no. June, p. 100625, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2020.100625.

A. F. Ladiba, G. P. Srikandi, A. L. Sihombing, H. A. Rasyid, I. M. A. D. Susila, and M. I. A. Irsyad, “Economic value of carbon sequestration in conservation forests for geothermal power plant development areas,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1108, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1108/1/012025.

A. W. Budiarto and A. Surjosatyo, “Indonesia’s Road to Fulfill National Renewable Energy Plan Target in 2025 and 2050: Current Progress, Challenges, and Management Recommendations - A Small Review,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 940, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/940/1/012032.

N. A. Pambudi, “Geothermal power generation in Indonesia, a country within the ring of fire: Current status, future development and policy,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 81, no. March, pp. 2893-2901, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.096.

A. D. Setiawan, M. P. Dewi, B. A. Jafino, and A. Hidayatno, “Evaluating feed-in tariff policies on enhancing geothermal development in Indonesia,” Energy Policy, vol. 168, no. September 2021, p. 113164, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113164.

R. M. Shoedarto, Y. Tada, K. Kashiwaya, K. Koike, and I. Iskandar, “Advanced characterization of hydrothermal flows within recharge and discharge areas using rare earth elements, proved through a case study of two-phase reservoir geothermal field, in Southern Bandung, West Java, Indonesia,” Geothermics, vol. 105, no. July, p. 102507, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102507.

S. Darma, Y. L. Imani, M. N. A. Shidqi, T. D. Riyanto, and M. Y. Daud, “Country Update: The Fast Growth of Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia,” Proceeding World Geotherm. Congr. 2020+1, no. 12, pp. 1-9, 2021.

B. Azmi, M. Stefanus, K. B. W. Putra, S. Sugiharto, and M. Abdi, “Measurement of scale thickness in geothermal pipeline using gamma transmission method: A preliminary study in Kamojang geothermal power plant,” 2021. doi: 10.1063/5.0066496.

T. Sharmin, N. R. Khan, M. S. Akram, and M. M. Ehsan, “A State-of-the-Art Review on Geothermal Energy Extraction, Utilization, and Improvement Strategies: Conventional, Hybridized, and Enhanced Geothermal Systems,” Int. J. Thermofluids, vol. 18, no. May, p. 100323, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100323.

R. Adiprana, D. S. Purnomo, and I. E. Lubis, “Kamojang Geothermal Power Plant Unit 1-2-3 Evaluation and Optimization Based on Exergy Analysis,” Proc. World Geotherm. Congr. Melbourne, Aust. 19-25 April 2015, no. April, 2015.

B. T. H. Marbun, R. H. Ridwan, H. S. Nugraha, S. Z. Sinaga, and B. A. Purbantanu, “Review of directional drilling design and operation of geothermal wells in Indonesia,” Renew. Energy, vol. 176, pp. 135-152, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.078.

F. S. Tut Haklıdır, “The importance of long-term well management in geothermal power systems using fuzzy control: A Western Anatolia (Turkey) case study,” Energy, vol. 213, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118817.

S. Green, J. McLennan, P. Panja, K. Kitz, R. Allis, and J. Moore, “Geothermal battery energy storage,” Renew. Energy, vol. 164, pp. 777-790, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.083.

I. Dincer and M. A. Rosen, Energy, environment, and sustainable development, 3rd ed. Elsevier Ltd., 2020. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-820775-8.00005-2.

V. M. Ambriz-Dí­az, C. Rubio-Maya, O. Chí¡vez, E. Ruiz-Casanova, and E. Pastor-Martí­nez, “Thermodynamic performance and economic feasibility of Kalina, Goswami and Organic Rankine Cycles coupled to a polygeneration plant using geothermal energy of low-grade temperature,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 243, no. 1 September 2021, p. 114362, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114362.

B. Rudiyanto, M. Aries, N. Agung, W. Widjonarko, and M. Hijriawan, “An update of second law analysis and optimization of a single-flash geothermal power plant in Dieng, Indonesia,” Geothermics, vol. 96, no. March, p. 102212, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102212.

M. A. Ehyaei, A. Ahmadi, M. A. Rosen, and A. Davarpanah, “Thermodynamic optimization of a geothermal power plant with a genetic algorithm in two stages,” Processes, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1-16, 2020, doi: 10.3390/pr8101277.

H. Chen, Y. Wang, J. Li, G. Xu, J. Lei, and T. Liu, “Thermodynamic analysis and economic assessment of an improved geothermal power system integrated with a biomass-fired cogeneration plant,” Energy, vol. 240, p. 122477, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122477.

G. í‡etin and A. Keí§ebaÅŸ, “Optimization of thermodynamic performance with simulated annealing algorithm: A geothermal power plant,” Renew. Energy, vol. 172, pp. 968-982, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.101.

B. Rudiyanto et al., “Preliminary analysis of dry-steam geothermal power plant by employing exergy assessment: Case study in Kamojang geothermal power plant, Indonesia,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 10, no. July, pp. 292-301, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2017.07.006.

N. D. Setyawan et al., “Energy and exergy analysis of dry-steam geothermal power plant”¯: Case study in kamojang geothermal power plant unit 2,” in AASEC 2018, 2018, vol. 08018, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201819708018.

D. S. Purnomo, T. Haryono, and Masitoh, “Derating prediction due to scaling at kamojang geothermal turbine using nozzle blocking ratio calculation,” Proceeding - 2nd Int. Conf. Technol. Policy Electr. Power Energy, ICT-PEP 2020, vol. 3, pp. 142-146, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ICT-PEP50916.2020.9249825.

M. Hijriawan, N. A. Pambudi, D. S. Wijayanto, M. K. Biddinika, and B. L. H. Saw, “Experimental analysis of R134a working fluid on Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems with scroll-expander,” Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J., vol. 29, no. May, p. 101036, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2021.06.016.

J. Xu, Z. Su, J. Meng, Y. Yao, M. S. Vafadaran, and A. Kiani Salavat, “A thermodynamic, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental investigation and optimization on a novel geothermal trigeneration system to sustain a sport arena,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 177, no. July, pp. 278-298, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2023.07.017.

C. N. Nsanzubuhoro, T. Bello-Ochende, and A. G. Malan, “Second law analysis of a fossil-geothermal hybrid power plant with thermodynamic optimization of geothermal preheater,” Heat Transf., vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 3997-4018, 2020, doi: 10.1002/htj.21692.

C. Wang, Y. Ma, and W. Sui, “The Secondary Flows in a Cyclone Separator”¯: A Review,” Processes, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 2935, 2023, doi: 10.3390/pr11102935.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).