DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.15.1.19743

A Structural Equation Model to Assess the Impact of the Economic and Environmental Benefits to the Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) Adoption

Fuad Muchlis (1), Ahmad Syariful Jamil (2), Resti Prastika Destiarni (3), Ahmad Zainuddin (4), Dwi Nurul Amalia (5), Muhammad Abdul Aziz (6), Araz Meilin (7)
(1) Faculty of Agriculture, Jambi University, Indonesia
(2) Graduate School of Animal Science and Agriculture, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Japan
(3) Faculty of Agriculture, University of Trunojoyo, Madura, Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Agriculture, Jember University, Indonesia
(5) Graduate School, IPB University, Indonesia
(6) Faculty of Agriculture, Jambi University, Indonesia
(7) Research Center for Horticulture. National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
[1]
F. Muchlis, “A Structural Equation Model to Assess the Impact of the Economic and Environmental Benefits to the Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) Adoption”, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 231–239, Feb. 2025.
Citation Format :
Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) was established initially to protect the national interest. However, the implementation level of ISPO still needs to be improved, mainly by smallholders. The low interest of smallholders is closely related to rational reasons such as economic and environmental benefits. Therefore, this study fills the gap by analyzing the economic and environmental benefits of adopting ISPO certifications using 300 respondents (150 ISPO and 150 non-ISPO) from four regencies (Batanghari, Muaro Jambi, Tebo, and Tanjung Jabung Barat) in Jambi Province, Indonesia. The study employed a closed-ended questionnaire to collect the farmers’ perspective data and utilized the Structural Equation Model (SEM) to address the research question. SEM can capture the perceptions of respondents and describe the impact of economic and environmental benefits to the ISPO adoption. The results found that the intention to adopt ISPO directly impacted the adoption rate. The intention to adopt by smallholders can be influenced by two variables, namely economic benefits and controlling behavior. The impact of the environmental advantages on the adoption intention was found to be insignificant. In addition, economic benefits have a dominant influence on all latent variables that compose intentions to adopt, such as subjective norms, attitudes toward sustainable management, and perceived control behavior. The study recommends that stakeholders pursue measures to disseminate the economic benefits of ISPO implementation to smallholders through various channels, including governmental and private extension. The government should also carry out a policy to create a supporting ecosystem to boost farmers' participation in adopting ISPO certification.

M. Arsyad, A. Amiruddin, Suharno, and S. Jahroh, “Competitiveness of palm oil products in international trade: An analysis between Indonesia and Malaysia,” Caraka Tani: J. Sustain. Agric., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 157–167, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.20961/carakatani.v35i2.41091.

H. Hasnah, R. Hariance, and M. Hendri, “Analysis of the implementation of Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil-ISPO certification at farmer level in West Pasaman Regency,” in IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 741, p. 012072, May 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/741/1/012072.

J. F. D. Tapia, S. S. Doliente, and S. Samsatli, “How much land is available for sustainable palm oil?,” Land Use Policy, vol. 102, p. 105187, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105187.

J. F. D. Tapia, S. S. Doliente, and S. Samsatli, “How much land is available for sustainable palm oil?,” Land Use Policy, vol. 102, p. 105187, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105187.

Kementerian Pertanian, Statistical of National Leading Estate Crops Commodity 2020-2022. Jakarta, Dec. 2021.

K. G. Austin, A. Mosnier, J. Pirker, I. McCallum, S. Fritz, and P. S. Kasibhatla, “Shifting patterns of oil palm driven deforestation in Indonesia and implications for zero-deforestation commitments,” Land Use Policy, vol. 69, pp. 41–48, Dec. 2017, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.036.

L. M. Ayompe, M. Schaafsma, and B. N. Egoh, “Towards sustainable palm oil production: The positive and negative impacts on ecosystem services and human wellbeing,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 278, p. 123914, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123914.

M. Eilenberg, “The last enclosure: Smoke, fire, and crisis on the Indonesian forest frontier,” J. Peasant Stud., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 969–998, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/03066150.2021.1907355.

R. Astuti, “Governing the ungovernable: The politics of disciplining pulpwood and palm oil plantations in Indonesia’s tropical peatland,” Geoforum, vol. 124, pp. 381–391, Aug. 2021, doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.03.004.

I. Lestari, D. Murdiyarso, and M. Taufik, “Rewetting tropical peatlands reduced net greenhouse gas emissions in Riau Province, Indonesia,” Forests, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 505, Mar. 2022, doi:10.3390/f13040505.

K. Ribeiro et al., “Tropical peatlands and their contribution to the global carbon cycle and climate change,” Glob. Change Biol., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 489–505, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1111/gcb.15408.

S. Mayr, B. Hollaus, and V. Madner, “Palm oil, the RED II, and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green?,” Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 233–248, Jul. 2021, doi:10.1111/reel.12386.

P. Dusser, “The European energy policy for 2020–2030 RED II: What future for vegetable oil as a source of bioenergy?,” OCL, vol. 26, p. 51, 2019, doi: 10.1051/ocl/2019040.

A. H. Dharmawan et al., “The agrarian, structural, and cultural constraints of smallholders’ readiness for sustainability standards implementation: The case of Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil in East Kalimantan,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1–20, Mar. 2021, doi:10.3390/su13052611.

F. Hariyanti, A. Syahza, Zulkarnain, and Nofrizal, “Sustainability of the palm oil industry: An empirical study of the development of sustainable oil palm in Bengkalis Regency, Indonesia,” Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 109–118, Feb. 2022, doi:10.18280/ijsdp.170110.

Rodhiah, I. Ifdal, I. W. Syarfi, and H. Hasnah, “The impact of ISPO certification on economic, social, and environmental aspects in the palm oil plantation,” in IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 336, p. 012013, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/336/1/012013.

S. A. B. Choiruzzad, A. Tyson, and H. Varkkey, “The ambiguities of Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil certification: Internal incoherence, governance rescaling, and state transformation,” Asia Eur. J., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 189–208, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10308-020-00593-0.

L. R. Wibowo et al., “Accelerating certification of oil palm smallholders through institutionalization of various incentives,” For. Soc., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 263–294, Nov. 2023, doi:10.24259/fs.v7i2.24679.

N. Yuslaini, U. Suwaryo, N. A. Deliarnoor, and D. Sri Kartini, “Palm oil industry and investment development in Dumai City, Indonesia: A focus on local economy development and sustainability,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2235780.

G. Mulyasari, I. N. Djarot, N. A. Sasongko, and A. S. Putra, “Social-life cycle assessment of oil palm plantation smallholders in Bengkulu province, Indonesia,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 8, Aug. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19123.

E. P. Pramudya et al., “Incentives for palm oil smallholders in mandatory certification in Indonesia,” Land, vol. 11, no. 4, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/land11040576.

P. Pacheco, G. Schoneveld, A. Dermawan, H. Komarudin, and M. Djama, “Governing sustainable palm oil supply: Disconnects, complementarities, and antagonisms between state regulations and private standards,” Regul. Gov., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–20, Jul. 2020, doi:10.1111/rego.12220.

N. Saadun et al., “Socio-ecological perspectives of engaging smallholders in environmental-friendly palm oil certification schemes,” Land Use Policy, vol. 72, pp. 333–340, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.057.

M. Apriyanto, Partini, H. Mardesci, G. Syahrantau, and Yulianti, “The role of farmers readiness in the sustainable palm oil industry,” in J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1764, p. 012211, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012211.

E. Oliphant and A. C. Simon, “The cost of sustainable palm oil: Should an Indonesian smallholder pursue RSPO certification?,” World Dev. Perspect., vol. 26, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.wdp.2022.100432.

R. E. De Vos, A. Suwarno, M. Slingerland, P. J. Van Der Meer, and J. M. Lucey, “Independent oil palm smallholder management practices and yields: Can RSPO certification make a difference?,” Environ. Res. Lett., vol. 16, no. 6, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac018d.

Y. S. Tey, M. Brindal, A. H. I. A. Hadi, and S. Darham, “Financial costs and benefits of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil certification among independent smallholders: A probabilistic view of the Monte Carlo approach,” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 30, pp. 377–386, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.020.

N. A. Majid, Z. Ramli, S. M. Sum, and A. H. Awang, “Sustainable palm oil certification scheme frameworks and impacts: A systematic literature review,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 3263, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13063263.

S. A. B. Choiruzzad, A. Tyson, and H. Varkkey, “The ambiguities of Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil certification: Internal incoherence, governance rescaling, and state transformation,” Asia Eur. J., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 189–208, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10308-020-00593-0.

K. K. Naji, M. Gunduz, and A. F. Naser, “The effect of change-order management factors on construction project success: A structural equation modeling approach,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 148, no. 9, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002350.

J. E. Villalva A．, “Sustainability assessment in the steel industry using partial least squares - Structural equation model,” World Dev. Sustain., vol. 2, p. 100054, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.wds.2023.100054.

M. S. Malek and V. Bhatt, “Examine the comparison of CSFs for public and private sector’s stakeholders: A SEM approach towards PPP in Indian road sector,” Int. J. Constr. Manag., vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 2239–2248, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2022.2049490.

M. W. Browne and R. Cudeck, “Alternative ways of assessing model fit,” Sociol. Methods Res., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 230–258, Nov. 1992, doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005.

K. G. Jöreskog and D. Sörbom, LISREL 8. Chicago: Scientific Software, 2001.

D. Chrisendo, H. Siregar, and M. Qaim, “Oil palm and structural transformation of agriculture in Indonesia,” Agric. Econ., vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 849–862, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1111/agec.12658.

N. Mehraban, B. L. Debela, U. Kalsum, and M. Qaim, “What about her? Oil palm cultivation and intra-household gender roles,” Food Policy, vol. 110, p. 102276, Jul. 2022, doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102276.

J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham, Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed. Prentice Hall, 2006.

A. H. Dharmawan et al., “The agrarian, structural, and cultural constraints of smallholders’ readiness for sustainability standards implementation: The case of Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil in East Kalimantan,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 2611, Mar. 2021, doi:10.3390/su13052611.

N. Dewi, S. Hadi, N. A. Rosnita, and Y. Kusumawaty, “Improving performance of independent smallholders towards the principles of Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil certification in Riau Province: Prospective scenario approach,” Int. J. Environ. Waste Manag., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 534–553, 2023, doi: 10.1504/ijewm.2023.131152.

A. B. Rahutomo, M. Karuniasa, and E. Frimawaty, “Peningkatan produktivitas lahan pekebun melalui sertifikasi kelapa sawit berkelanjutan di Indonesia,” Anal. Kebijakan Pertan., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 43–55, 2023, doi: 10.21082/akp.v21n1.2023.43-55.

M. Adem and F. Tesafa, “Intensity of income diversification among small-holder farmers in Asayita Woreda, Afar Region, Ethiopia,” Cogent Econ. Finance, vol. 8, no. 1, 2020, doi:10.1080/23322039.2020.1759394.

G. Danso-Abbeam, G. Dagunga, and D. S. Ehiakpor, “Rural non-farm income diversification: Implications on smallholder farmers’ welfare and agricultural technology adoption in Ghana,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 11, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05393.

E. I. K. Putri et al., “The oil palm governance: Challenges of sustainability policy in Indonesia,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14031820.

J. D. Watts et al., “Challenges faced by smallholders in achieving sustainable palm oil certification in Indonesia,” World Dev., vol. 146, p. 105565, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105565.

F. Isharyadi, U. Ayuningtyas, B. D. Tampubolon, D. R. Wahono, and N. Aliyah, “The challenges of sustainable palm oil product development in Indonesia against consumer demand,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 828, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/828/1/012055.

E. Meijaard et al., “The environmental impacts of palm oil in context,” Nat. Plants, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1418–1426, Dec. 2020, doi:10.1038/s41477-020-00813-w.

M. Sofiyuddin, S. Suyanto, S. Kadir, and S. Dewi, “Sustainable land preparation for farmer-managed lowland agriculture in Indonesia,” For. Policy Econ., vol. 130, p. 102534, Sep. 2021, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102534.

R. E. de Vos, A. Suwarno, M. Slingerland, P. J. van der Meer, and J. M. Lucey, “Pre-certification conditions of independent oil palm smallholders in Indonesia: Assessing prospects for RSPO certification,” Land Use Policy, vol. 130, p. 106660, Jul. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106660.

M. A. Agustira, R. F. Ranola, A. J. U. Sajise, and L. M. Florece, “Economic impacts of smallholder oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) plantations on peatlands in Indonesia,” J. Econ. Manag. Agric. Dev., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 105–123, 2015.

E. P. Pramudya et al., “Incentives for palm oil smallholders in mandatory certification in Indonesia,” Land, vol. 11, no. 4, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/land11040576.

A. Syahza and M. Irianti, “Formulation of control strategy on the environmental impact potential as a result of the development of palm oil plantation,” J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 106–116, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1108/JSTPM-06-2019-0059.

Y. B. Kadarusman and A. G. Herabadi, “Improving sustainable development within Indonesian palm oil: The importance of the reward system,” Sustain. Dev., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 422–434, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1002/sd.1715.

E. P. Purnomo, R. Ramdani, Agustiyara, Q. P. V. Tomaro, and G. S. Samidjo, “Land ownership transformation before and after forest fires in Indonesian palm oil plantation areas,” J. Land Use Sci., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 37–51, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1080/1747423X.2019.1614686.

N. Saadun et al., “Socio-ecological perspectives of engaging smallholders in environmental-friendly palm oil certification schemes,” Land Use Policy, vol. 72, pp. 333–340, Mar. 2018, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.057.

G. Schouten and P. Glasbergen, “Creating legitimacy in global private governance: The case of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil,” Ecol. Econ., vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 1891–1899, Sep. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.012.

B. Wicke, R. Sikkema, V. Dornburg, and A. Faaij, “Exploring land use changes and the role of palm oil production in Indonesia and Malaysia,” Land Use Policy, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 193–206, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.001.

S. B. Hansen, R. Padfield, K. Syayuti, S. Evers, Z. Zakariah, and S. Mastura, “Trends in global palm oil sustainability research,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 100, pp. 140–149, Aug. 2015, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.051.

M. Gatto, M. Wollni, and M. Qaim, “Oil palm boom and land-use dynamics in Indonesia: The role of policies and socioeconomic factors,” Land Use Policy, vol. 46, pp. 292–303, Jun. 2015, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.001.

M. Euler, V. Krishna, S. Schwarze, H. Siregar, and M. Qaim, “Oil palm adoption, household welfare, and nutrition among smallholder farmers in Indonesia,” World Dev., vol. 93, pp. 219–235, May 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.019.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).