DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.14.3.19929

Derivate OJIP Variables in Sugarcane to Predict Cane Weight, Sucrose Content, and Sugar Yield

Weda Makarti Mahayu (1), Mala Murianingrum (2), Sri Yulaikah (3), Parnidi (4), Djumali (5), Bambang Heliyanto (6), Anik Herwati (7), Rully Dyah Purwati (8), Moch. Machfud (9), Fatkhur Rochman (10), Marjani (11), Taufiq Hidayat RS (12), Prima Diarini Riajaya (13), Fitriningdyah Tri Kadarwati (14), Supriyono (15), Cece Suhara (16)
(1) Research Group of Breeding on Sweetener, Tobacco, Fibre and Industrial Oil Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
(2) Research Group of Breeding on Sweetener, Tobacco, Fibre and Industrial Oil Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
(3) Research Group of Breeding on Sweetener, Tobacco, Fibre and Industrial Oil Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
(4) Research Group of Breeding on Sweetener, Tobacco, Fibre and Industrial Oil Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
(5) Research Group of Breeding on Sweetener, Tobacco, Fibre and Industrial Oil Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
(6) Research Group of Breeding on Sweetener, Tobacco, Fibre and Industrial Oil Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
(7) Research Group of Breeding on Sweetener, Tobacco, Fibre and Industrial Oil Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
(8) Research Group of Breeding on Sweetener, Tobacco, Fibre and Industrial Oil Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
(9) Research Group of Breeding on Sweetener, Tobacco, Fibre and Industrial Oil Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
(10) Research Group of Breeding on Sweetener, Tobacco, Fibre and Industrial Oil Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
(11) Research Group of Breeding on Sweetener, Tobacco, Fibre and Industrial Oil Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
(12) Research Group of Development of High Quality-Seed Production Technology for Horticulture and Estate Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
(13) Research Group of Precision Cultivation of Estate Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
(14) Research Group of Precision Cultivation of Estate Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
(15) Research Group of Plant Pest-Diseases Detection System of Horticulture and Estate Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
(16) Research Group of Plant Pest-Diseases Detection System of Horticulture and Estate Crops, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Mahayu , Weda Makarti, et al. “Derivate OJIP Variables in Sugarcane to Predict Cane Weight, Sucrose Content, and Sugar Yield”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 14, no. 3, June 2024, pp. 1010-7, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.14.3.19929.
Citation Format :
The amount of carbohydrates in sugarcane directly results from photosynthesis. This means that we can predict the weight of the cane, sucrose content, and sugar yield by examining the photosynthesis process. One way to measure the amount of photosynthesis is by using chlorophyll fluorescence or the OJIP test. This study aimed to determine the dominant OJIP variable that could predict cane weight, sucrose content, sugar yield, and measurement time. The study was conducted at the Asembagus Experimental Station in Situbondo Regency, East Java, Indonesia, from December 2016 to October 2017 using two-bud stem cuttings from 18 sugarcane clones and arranged them in a Randomized Block Design with three replications. Each clone in one replication was planted in five rows, each row being five meters long, and the center-to-center distance was 130 cm. OJIP variables were measured during the stalk elongation phase and the maturity phase. The results showed that sugarcane clones influenced OJIP variables other than Fv/Fm, cane weight, sucrose content, and sugar yield. The most accurate time for measuring OJIP variables was during the maturity phase. The dominant OJIP variables that could predict cane weight and sugar yield were TRo/RC, DIo/CS, ABS/RC, and PI (79.4% and 76.0%). The dominant predictors of yield were RC/CSo, RC/CSm, DIo/CS, PI, ABS/RC, and ETo/RC (92.9%). This study found that measuring OJIP variables during the maturity phase is ideal for predicting cane weight, sucrose content, and sugar yield. The OJIP test can quickly identify high-yielding sugarcane varieties.

F. R. Marin, J. I. Rattalino Edreira, J. F. Andrade, and P. Grassini, “Sugarcane Yield and Yield Components as Affected by Harvest Time,” Sugar Tech, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 819–826, 2021, doi:10.1007/s12355-020-00945-5.

B. Desalegn, E. Kebede, H. Legesse, and T. Fite, “Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement: Selecting variety, nitrogen fertilizer rate, and bioregulator as a first-line treatment,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 4, p. e15520, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15520.

D. Zhao, A. Momotaz, C. LaBorde, and M. Irey, “Biomass Yield and Carbohydrate Composition in Sugarcane and Energy Cane Grown on Mineral Soils,” Sugar Tech, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 630–640, 2020, doi:10.1007/s12355-020-00807-0.

S. Akbarian, C. Xu, W. Wang, S. Ginns, and S. Lim, “Sugarcane yields prediction at the row level using a novel cross-validation approach to multi-year multispectral images,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 198, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.107024.

C. Qin et al., “Identification of proteins and metabolic networks associated with sucrose accumulation in sugarcane ( Saccharum spp . interspecific hybrids ),” J. Plant Interact., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 166–178, 2021, doi: 10.1080/17429145.2021.1912840.

J. S. Khokhar, N. Jamwal, G. S. Sanghera, and P. Singh, “Evaluation of Sugarcane germplasm for quality , yield traits and effects of flowering on cane traits Evaluation of sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum ) germplasm for quality , yield traits and effects of flowering on cane traits,” Indian J. Agric. Sci., vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 842–6, 2022, doi: 10.56093/ijas.v92i7.105840.

Parnidi, M. M Murianigrum, A. Ridhawati, K. KWijayanti, M. Machfud, and Marjani, “Evaluation of the health and sugarcane seed production from the first ratoon cane at various harvest ages Evaluation of the health and sugarcane seed production from the first ratoon cane at various harvest ages,” in Earth and Environmental Science 974, 2022, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/974/1/012006.

B. Desalegn, E. Kebede, H. Legesse, and T. Fite, “Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement : Selecting variety , nitrogen fertilizer rate , and bioregulator as a first-line treatment,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. e15520, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15520.

P. D. Riajaya, B. Hariyono, M. Cholid, F. T. Kadarwati, and B. Santoso, “Growth and Yield Potential of New Sugarcane Varieties during Plant and First Ratoon Crops,” Growth Yield Potential New Sugarcane Var. Dur. Plant First Ratoon Crop., vol. 14, no. 14396, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ su142114396.

G. D. Urgesa and E. O. Keyata, “Effect of Harvesting Ages on Yield and Yield Components of Sugar Cane Varieties Cultivated at Finchaa Sugar Factory, Oromia, Ethiopia,” Int. J. Food Sci., vol. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/2702095.

Q. Khan, Y. Qin, D. Guo, X. Zeng, and J. Chen, “Morphological, agronomical, physiological and molecular characterization of a high sugar mutant of sugarcane in comparison to mother variety,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1–27, 2022, doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0264990.

J. De Oliveira, L. Silva, and R. Gonçalves, “Under aluminum stress MicroRNAs regulate tolerance mechanisms in sugarcane ( Saccharum spp .) under aluminum stress,” Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.1590/1984-70332021v21n1a5.

M. Reza, M. Shamsabad, M. Esmaeilizadeh, and H. R. Roosta, “The effect of supplementary light on the photosynthetic apparatus of strawberry plants under salinity and alkalinity stress,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 13257, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17377-8.

J. Som-ard, C. Atzberger, E. Izquierdo-verdiguier, F. Vuolo, and M. Immitzer, “Remote Sensing Applications in Sugarcane Cultivation : A Review,” Remote sens, vol. 13, no. 4040, pp. 1–46, 2021, doi:10.3390/rs13204040.

A. Stirbet, G. Y. Riznichenko, A. B. Rubin, and Govindjee, “Modeling Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Transient : Relation to Photosynthesis,” Biochem., vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 291–323, 2014, doi:10.1134/S0006297914040014.

L. Yudina et al., “Effect of Duration of LED Lighting on Growth, Photosynthesis and Respiration in Lettuce,” Plants, vol. 12, no. 442, pp. 1–22, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ plants12030442.

J. J. Zhang, L. Zhu, X. Zhang, J. Zhou, and R. D. Guy, “Photosynthetic performance and growth responses of Liriope muscari ( Decne .) L . H . Bailey ( Asparagaceae ) to different levels of irradiance in three seasons,” Flora, vol. 278, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2021.151798.

W. Li et al., “A novel protein domain is important for photosystem II complex assembly and photoautotrophic growth in angiosperms,” Mol. Plant, vol. 16, pp. 374–392, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.12.016.

H. Lokstein, G. Renger, and J. P. Gotze, “Photosynthetic Light-Harvesting (Antenna) Complexes—Structures and Functions,” Molecules, vol. 26, no. 3378, pp. 1–24, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ molecules26113378.

A. Stirbet, G. Y. Riznichenko, A. B. Rubin, and Govindjee, “Modeling chlorophyll a fluorescence transient: Relation to photosynthesis,” Biochem., vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 291–323, 2014, doi:10.1134/S0006297914040014.

C. Jedmowski, A. Ashoub, and W. Brüggemann, “Reactions of Egyptian landraces of Hordeum vulgare and Sorghum bicolor to drought stress, evaluated by the OJIP fluorescence transient analysis,” Acta Physiol. Plant., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 345–354, 2013, doi:10.1007/s11738-012-1077-9.

J. J. S. Van Rensen and W. J. Vredenberg, “Adaptation of photosystem II to high and low light in wild-type and triazine-resistant Canola plants: Analysis by a fluorescence induction algorithm,” Photosynth. Res., vol. 108, no., pp. 191–200, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11120-011-9680-y.

A. Colpo, S. Demaria, C. Baldisserotto, and S. Pancaldi, “Long-Term Alleviation of the Functional Phenotype in Chlorophyll-Deficient Wheat and Impact on Productivity : A Semi-Field Phenotyping Experiment,” Plants, vol. 12, no. 822, pp. 1–23, 2023, doi:10.3390/plants12040822.

T. Swoczyna, H. M. Kalaji, F. Bussotti, J. Mojski, and M. Pollastrini, “Environmental stress - what can we learn from chlorophyll a fl uorescence analysis in woody plants ? A review,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 13, no. 1048582, pp. 1–19, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1048582.

N. Kumar, L. Rana, A. K. Singh, A. Kumar, D. N. Kamat, and S. N. Singh, “Performance of new early genotypes of sugarcane ( Saccharum spp . hybrid complex ) as influenced by row spacing,” Eco. Env. Cons, vol. 29, no. May, pp. S184–S187, 2023, doi:10.53550/EEC.2023.v29i03s.035.

C. Mahadevaiah et al., “Delineation of genotype × environment interaction for identification of stable genotypes for tillering phase drought stress tolerance in sugarcane,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98002-y.

A. Q. Khan, K. A. Tadesse, and B. L. Robe, “A Study on Morphological Characters of Introduced Sugarcane Varieties ( Saccharum spp ., Hybrid ) in Ethiopia Abdul Qayyum Khan , Kiya Adare Tadesse and Berhanu Lemma Robe”, doi:10.3923/ijpbg.2017.1.12.

C. Liu et al., “Relationships of stomatal morphology to the environment across plant communities,” Nat. Commun., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42136-2.

E. G. Martinazzo, A. Ramm, and M. A. Bacarin, “The chlorophyll a fluorescence as an indicator of the temperature stress in the leaves of Prunus persica,” no. December 2012, 2014, doi: 10.1590/S1677-04202013005000001.

S. Muhammad, K. Wuyts, G. Nuyts, K. De Wael, and R. Samson, “Characterization of epicuticular wax structures on leaves of urban plant species and its association with leaf wettability,” Urban For. Urban Green., vol. 47, no. May 2019, p. 126557, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126557.

R. Oguchi, I. Terashima, and W. Soon, “The effect of different spectral light quality on the photoinhibition of Photosystem I in intact leaves,” Photosynth. Res., vol. 149, pp. 83–92, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11120-020-00805-z.

Y. Zhang, C. Chen, Z. Jin, Z. Yang, and Y. Li, “Leaf anatomy , photosynthesis , and chloroplast ultrastructure of Heptacodium miconioides seedlings reveal adaptation to light environment,” Environ. Exp. Bot., vol. 195, no. 104780, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.104780.

A. Porcar-castell et al., “Chlorophyll a fluorescence illuminates a path connecting plant molecular biology to Earth-system science,” Nat. Plants, vol. 7, pp. 998–1009, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00980-4.

R. Desotgiu, M. Pollastrini, C. Cascio, G. Gerosa, and R. Marzuoli, “Chlorophyll a fluorescence analysis along a vertical gradient of the crown in a poplar ( Oxford clone ) subjected to ozone and water stress,” no. July, 2012, doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps062.

X. Zhang, K. Chen, W. Wang, G. Liu, C. Yang, and J. Jiang, “Differences in Leaf Morphology and Related Gene Expression between Diploid and Tetraploid Birch (Betula pendula),” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 23, no. 21, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijms232112966.

M. H. Siebers, N. Gomez-casanovas, P. Fu, K. Meacham-hensold, C. E. Moore, and C. J. Bernacchi, “Emerging approaches to measure photosynthesis from the leaf to the ecosystem,” Emerg. Top. Life Sci., vol. 5, pp. 261–274, 2021, doi: 10.1042/ETLS20200292.

S. Avivi et al., “Tolerance Screening of Sugarcane Varieties Toward Waterlogging Stress,” in E3S Web of Conferences, 2020, vol. 142, 03007, pp. 1–6. doi: doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202014203007.

T. Vizine, D. Cruz, and R. L. Machado, “Measuring climate change ’ s impact on different sugarcane varieties production in the South of Goiás,” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 11637, pp. 1–12, 2023, doi:10.1038/s41598-023-36582-7.

L. Li and X. L. X. Xu, “Effects of high temperature on the chlorophyll a fluorescence of Alhagi sparsifolia at the southern Taklamakan Desert,” pp. 243–249, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11738-013-1405-8.

R. Goussi, A. Manaa, W. Derbali, S. Cantamessa, C. Abdelly, and R. Barbato, “Comparative analysis of salt stress, duration and intensity, on the chloroplast ultrastructure and photosynthetic apparatus in Thellungiella salsuginea,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol., vol. 183, no. May, pp. 275–287, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.04.047.

Q. Zou, D. Liu, M. Sang, and C. Jiang, “Sunflower Leaf Structure Affects Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Induction Kinetics In Vivo,” 2022.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).