DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.15.1.20241

Evaluation of Damage Assessment of the High-Rise Building with Brace

Siti Nur Rahmah Anwar (1), Feryan Ernanda (2), Mohamad Sulton (3), Siti Aminah Anwar (4)
(1) Department of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia
(2) Department of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia
(3) Department of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia
(4) Department of Economics, Universitas Islam Malang, Malang, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
[1]
S. N. R. Anwar, F. Ernanda, M. Sulton, and S. A. Anwar, “Evaluation of Damage Assessment of the High-Rise Building with Brace”, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 196–204, Feb. 2025.
Citation Format :
A bracing system is a component within a structure that counters horizontal forces such as wind, seismic activity, and other loads that may lead to the building swaying or falling. A properly designed bracing system can enhance a building's capacity to endure these forces and reduce harm to both the structure and those inside. The outcome of this research is to investigate the dynamic performance on the structural damage of high-rise building with various brace types. The methodology in this research is combined between experimental and numerical modeling of structures. The materials data of concrete and steel as the braces materials is defined from experimental results. The structures analysis is modeled using SAP2000 software, based on the existing materials data from experimental tests. The outputs reviewed are stiffness, vibration period of structure, displacement, drift, stiffness and ductility. The structural damage potential is connected to dynamic response of the building with braces as well. The dynamic parameters of natural frequency, and vibration period for the V brace shape, inverted-V brace shaped (Ʌ), and X shape (in two floors) are 0.806 Hz; 1.24 s, 0.893 Hz; 1.12 s, and 0.862 Hz; 1.16 s. The ductility of structures with V brace, inverted V brace and X brace (in two floors) are 2.58, 2.95, and 2.85. The result showed that inverted V-shaped bracing has the best  dynamic performance than others shapes. Based on modeling results, the building is safe condition under the actual spectra-response that is vibrated the building model.

Y. Deng, C. Yan, and P. Niu, “Hysteretic model of reinforced concrete bridge piers based on earthquake damage and corrosion from saline soil,” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., vol. 166, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107732.

M. Ferraioli, A. Concilio, and C. Molitierno, “Seismic performance of a reinforced concrete building retrofitted with self-centering shape memory alloy braces,” Procedia Struct. Integr., vol. 44, pp. 974–981, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.126.

A. V. Shegay et al., “Evaluation of seismic residual capacity ratio for reinforced concrete structures,” Resilient Cities Struct., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 28–45, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.rcns.2023.02.004.

D. Cook et al., “ASCE/SEI 41 assessment of reinforced concrete buildings: Benchmarking nonlinear dynamic procedures with empirical damage observations,” Earthq. Spectra, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1721–1754, 2023, doi: 10.1177/87552930231173453.

E. A. Opabola and K. J. Elwood, “Seismic performance of reinforced concrete beams susceptible to single-crack plastic hinge behavior,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 149, no. 4, 2023, doi: 10.1061/jsendh.steng-11424.

A. Habib, A. Al Houri, and U. Yildirim, “Comparative study of base-isolated irregular RC structures subjected to pulse-like ground motions with low and high PGA/PGV ratios,” Structures, vol. 31, pp. 1053–1071, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.02.021.

A. Aljaafreh et al., “Seismic performance of reinforced concrete structures with concrete deficiency caused by in-situ quality management issues,” Civ. Eng. J., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1957–1970, 2023, doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-08-010.

N. A. Karimzada, A. Shirkhani, and E. Aktas, “Application of endurance time method in seismic assessment of RC frames designed by direct displacement-based procedure,” Turk. J. Civ. Eng., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 23–64, 2024, doi: 10.18400/tjce.1239730.

M. Ubaid and R. A. Khan, “Effect of bracing configuration on the seismic response of buildings with re-entrant corners,” Innov. Infrastruct. Solut., vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s41062-022-01029-x.

M. M. Bhargav, A. V. Rao, and I. S. Kishore, “Performance assessment of seismic evaluation of steel-framed structure using different bracing systems,” in Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials, Guntur, India, 18–19 Mar. 2022, AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2759, p. 050006, May 2023, doi: 10.1063/5.0145310.

A. Panjaitan et al., “The performance of concentrically braced frames (CBF) in Chevron V brace and diagonal configuration by considering various frame heights,” Aceh Int. J. Sci. Technol., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 139–147, 2023, doi: 10.13170/aijst.12.2.30848.

A. Panjaitan et al., “Structural performance of single and double-section CBF braces with different lengths under cyclic loading,” in AISCE 2023, E3S Web Conf., vol. 476, 2024, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202447601003.

J. Zhao, H. Qiu, J. Sun, and H. Jiang, “Seismic performance evaluation of different strategies for retrofitting RC frame buildings,” Structures, vol. 34, pp. 2355–2366, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.016.

H. Beiraghi, A. Kheyroddi, and Z. Falaki Nafechi, “Behavior of reinforced concrete frames retrofitted by different configurations of concentric steel braces,” Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 2039–2052, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40996-021-00799-1.

M. Ghiasvandan et al., “Experimental and parametric study of a novel braced system to improve seismic performance,” Structures, vol. 45, pp. 229–242, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.120.

P. Castaldo, E. Tubaldi, F. Selvi, and L. Gioiella, “Seismic performance of an existing RC structure retrofitted with buckling restrained braces,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 33, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101688.

N. M. R. Solaimani and M. Mahmoudi, “Experimental and analytical evaluation of the seismic performance of Y-shaped braces equipped with yielding diagonal dampers,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 42, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102362.

S. Majid Zamani et al., “Experimental investigation of steel frames with single bays of symmetrical Y-shaped concentric bracings,” Sci. Iran., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 195–210, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.scient.2012.02.006.

M. Dicleli and A. Mehta, “Seismic performance of chevron braced steel frames with and without viscous fluid dampers as a function of ground motion and damper characteristics,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 1102–1115, 2007, doi: 10.3390/buildings12111977.

H. Chen et al., “Research on safety risk management of a steel bracing system based on catastrophe theory,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 11, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12111977.

A. Mishra and P. Alam, “Finite element method and P-delta analysis of G+10 multistorey frame building structure by using ETABS software,” in SESBT 2022, Tamilnadu, India, 2023, IOP Conf. Ser., vol. 1161, no. 1, p. 012012, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1161/1/012012.

E. U. Syed and K. M. Manzoor, “Analysis and design of buildings using Revit and ETABS software,” Mater. Today: Proc., vol. 65, pp. 1478–1485, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.463.

A. Z. Abdulhameed, M. A. Ahmed, and A. A. Karim, “The impact of bracing system distribution and location on seismic performance enhancement of multi-story steel buildings,” Math. Model. Eng. Probl., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1833–1841, 2023, doi: 10.18280/mmep.100536.

H. A. M. Yazdi and N. H. R. Sulong, “Optimization of off-centre bracing system using genetic algorithm,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 1435–1441, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.03.017.

W. F. Chen and E. M. Lui, Earthquake Engineering for Structural Design. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press, 2005, doi:10.1201/9781420037142.

C. Thongchom et al., “Performance improvement of innovative shear damper using diagonal stiffeners for concentrically braced frame systems,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 1794, 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12111794.

Y. Bakhshayesh, M. Shayanfar, and A. Ghamari, “Improving the performance of concentrically braced frame utilizing an innovative shear damper,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 182, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106672.

SNI 1726: Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Nongedung. Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN), Jakarta, Indonesia, 2019.

SNI 2847: Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Penjelasan (ACI 318M-14 dan ACI 318RM-14, MOD). Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN), Jakarta, Indonesia, 2019.

ACI Committee, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14). Farmington Hills, MI, USA: American Concrete Institute (ACI), 2014.

F. Anastasia et al., “The performance assessment of the structural bracing model for multi-story building,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 196–204, 2024, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.14.1.19397.

F. Fauzan et al., “Structural evaluation and strengthening strategy of the law faculty hall building in Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1567–1578, 2021, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.11.4.11613.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).