Context-aware-based Location Recommendation for Elderly Care

- Kurnianingsih (1), Lukito Edi Nugroho (2), - Widyawan (3), Lutfan Lazuardi (4), Anton Satria Prabuwono (5)
(1) Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Department of Electrical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia.
(2) Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
(3) Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
(4) Department of Public Health, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
(5) Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia.
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Kurnianingsih, -, et al. “Context-Aware-Based Location Recommendation for Elderly Care”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 7, no. 5, Oct. 2017, pp. 1667-7, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.7.5.3382.
As adults age, the body declines. Living independently at home can be a significant challenge for the elderly, particularly for those who suffer from dementia or who have memory impairment. Assisting the elderly to live independently and safely in their own homes by providing appropriate services for them and ensuring that caregivers are immediately alerted in the event of an emergency is crucial. Utilizing context in the recommendation process will make recommendations more appropriate. A model of a context-aware-based location recommender system that can seamlessly monitor the location of the elderly and deliver appropriate location recommendations by considering context is proposed as our contribution. Two scenarios are investigated: (1) we classify location as follows: bedroom (class 1), dining room (class 2), and living room (class 3); (2) we classify location as follows: inside (class 1) and outside (class 2) the bedroom. We evaluate our proposed model using a distance measure concept by employing the cosine distance method. We compare the cosine distance method with fuzzy inference system (FIS) rules on labeled data. The results of the experiments for the first scenario show that the cosine distance has better average accuracy than the fuzzy inference system. For the second scenario, fuzzy c-means (FCM) has the same average accuracy as cosine distance. FCM has slightly better accuracy in class 1 compared to cosine distance (1% difference in accuracy), whereas cosine distance has slightly better accuracy in class 2 compared to the FCM (1% difference in accuracy). In general, we can draw the conclusion that, on this dataset, cosine distance which uses a simple algorithm produced better results than the fuzzy inference system which uses a more complex algorithm. 

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).