Seismic Performances of High Rise R/C Frame Structures Reinforced with High Strength Rebars

Adi Mulya Sanjaya (1), Iswandi Imran (2)
(1) Department of Civil Engineering, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung-40141, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Civil Environmental Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung-40132, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Sanjaya, Adi Mulya, and Iswandi Imran. “Seismic Performances of High Rise R C Frame Structures Reinforced With High Strength Rebars”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 8, no. 2, Mar. 2018, pp. 431-43, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.8.2.4318.
Construction of high rise buildings as supporting infrastructures for economic growth has increased significantly in numbers in many big cities around the world. In Indonesia, most of the high-rise buildings constructed are made of reinforced concrete structures. In principles, the use of high-strength concrete, coupled with high strength rebars for high rise r/c buildings will result in more efficient and more constructible r/c constructions. However, in Indonesia, the use of high strength rebars for seismic-resistant r/c buildings is still prohibited. SNI 2847:2013 Section 21 specifies that the yield strength for reinforcing bars used in structural elements of special moment resisting frames is limited to 420 MPa. This provision is meant to limit higher shear and higher bond demand in the structural elements assigned to dissipate seismic energy. This paper presents a study on the use of high strength rebars in seismic resistant r/c buildings. In the study, 20 story buildings located in a region with high seismicity are designed. Two types of rebars are used, i.e., those with the yield strength of 550 MPa and of 690 MPa. The building structures are designed as the special moment resisting frame. The seismic performances of the buildings are then investigated by performing non-linear time history analysis. Seven pairs of scaled ground motions are used for the analysis. From this analysis, the failure mechanism of r/c buildings reinforced with 550 MPa yield strength is governed by beam mechanism, while the buildings reinforced with 690MPa yield strength rebars shows failure mechanism dominated by story mechanism. Globally, the performance levels of the buildings are within the zone of Damage Control (i.e., between immediate occupancy and life safety). Based on the findings, some recommendations are proposed for the use of high strength rebars in the design of seismic resistant high rise r/c buildings.

Iswandi Imran dan Fajar Hendrik, “Perencanaan Lanjut Struktur Beton Bertulang”, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, West Java, 2014.

Charles Pankow Foundation, “Determination of Yield Strength for Nonprestressed Steel Reinforcement”, Final Report RGA 04-13, Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. South Lake Avenue, 2013.

Constructed Facilities Laboratory, “A706 Grade 80 Reinforcement for Seismic Application”, Research Report No. RD-15-15, Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North California State University.

Applied Technology Council, “Roadmap for The Use of High-Strength Reinforcement in Reinfoced Concrete Design”, ATC-115, Redwood City, California, 2014.

National Institute of Standards and Technology, “Use of High-Strength Reinforcement in Earthquake-Resistant Concrete Structures”, NIST GCR 14-917-30, America, 2014.

H. Aoyama, “Design of Modern Highrise Reinforced Concrete Structure”, Vol 3, University of Tokyo, Japan, 2001.

H. Tavallali, “Cyclic Response of Concrete Beams Reinforced with Ultrahigh Strength Steel”, Ph. D. Thesis. Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, 2011.

American Concrete Institute, “Design Guide for The Use of ASTM A1035/A1035M Grade 100 (690) Steel Bars for Structural Concrete”, America, ACI ITG-6R-10, 2010.

American Concrete Institute, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete,” ACI 318-14, America, 2014.

American Society for Testing and Materials, “Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Low-Alloy Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement”, ASTM A706/A706-14, America, 2014.

American Society for Testing and Materials, “Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement”, ASTM A615/A615M-15, America, 2015.

American Society for Testing and Materials, “Deformed and Plain, Low-Carbon, Chromium, Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement”, ASTM A1035/A1035M-14, America, 2014.

T.Paulay and M.J.N. Priestley, “Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Mansory Buildings”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., San Diego, 1991.

National Cooperative Highway Research Program, “Design of Concrete Structures Using High-Strength Steel Reinforcement”, NCHRP Report 679, Washington, 2011.

National Institute of Standards and Technology, “Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Special Moment Frame”, NEHRP Seismic Design Technical Brief No.1, Second Edition, America. 2016.

ICC Evaluation Sevice Report, “SAS Stress Steel Grade 97 Thread Bar Steel Reinforcing Bars and Couplers”, ESR-1163, New Jersey, 2016.

B. E. Drit Sokoli, “Seismic Performance of Concrete Column Reinforced with High Strength Steel”, Thesis, The University of Texas, 2014.

American Society of Civil Engineers, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings”, ASCE/SEI 41-13, Virginia, 2013.

American Society of Civil Engineers, “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures”, ASCE/SEI 7-10, Virginia, 2010.

R. Park and T. Paulay, “Reinforced Concrete Structures”, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Christchurch, New Zealand, 1975.

Finley A. Charney, Ph.D., P.E, “Seismic Load : Guide to The Provision of ASCE 7-10”, American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia, 2010.

Standar Nasional Indonesia, “Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk Bangunan Gedung”, SNI 2847:2013, Jakarta, 2013.

Standar Nasional Indonesia, “Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Non Gedung”, SNI 1726:2012, Jakarta, 2012.

Standar Nasional Indonesia, “Beban Minimum untuk Perancangan Bangungan Gedung dan Struktur Lain”, SNI 1727:2013, Jakarta, 2013.

Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, “Practical Guidelines to Select and Scale Earthquake Records for Nonlinear Response History Analysis of Structure”, USGS File Report, Amerika, 2010.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).