DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.5.6923

Integrating AHP, Cluster Analysis, and Fuzzy TOPSIS to Evaluate Emergency Warehouse Locations of Mount Merapi Eruption Victims

Diana Puspita Sari (1), Purnawan Adi Wicaksono (2), Naniek Utami Handayani (3), Yessica Efirani Siahaan (4)
(1) Industrial Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia
(2) Industrial Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia
(3) Industrial Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia
(4) Industrial Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Sari, Diana Puspita, et al. “Integrating AHP, Cluster Analysis, and Fuzzy TOPSIS to Evaluate Emergency Warehouse Locations of Mount Merapi Eruption Victims”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 10, no. 5, Oct. 2020, pp. 1839-45, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.10.5.6923.
Citation Format :
This paper discusses using a multi-criteria decision model (MCDM) to determine a logistics warehouse location for humanitarian aid. This study concerns the volcanic disaster that occurred in Sleman Regency, Indonesia, in 2010. When this disaster occurred, the location for the logistics warehouse was still based on the closest distance with road access. Since it was located without considering several criteria, delivery to victims was not optimal and faced many obstacles. In this study, MCDM is applied using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Fuzzy TOPSIS (a technique for the order of preference by similarity to the ideal solution); AHP is used to generate selection criteria and sub-criteria based on expert opinion, while Fuzzy TOPSIS is used to identify the best option among potential locations based on these criteria and subcriteria. This study also uses cluster analysis to determine potential emergency warehouse locations in each operational area based on distance and the number of refugees. Seven criteria and 17 subcriteria were identified to determine the location of the emergency warehouse. In this case, the criteria and subcriteria with the highest weights were both delivery time. Based on the weight of the criteria and subcriteria and the cluster analysis, four potential warehouse locations were identified in the following priority order: Sukoharjo, Sidokerto, Tamanmartani, and Wedomartani.

T. Trirahayu, “Manajemen bencana erupsi gunung merapi oleh badan penanggulangan bencana daerah kabupaten sleman”. Jurnal Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1-14, 2015.

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. (2010). [Online]: https://geospasial.bnpb.go.id/2010/11/30/peta-rekapitulasi perkabupaten-jumlah-korban pengungsi-dan-kerusakan akibat-letusan-gunung merapi-30-nov-20101/. [Acessed 16 December 2017].

A.S. Thomas, and L. R. Kopczak, “From logistics to supply chain management: the path forward in the humanitarian sector”. Fritz Institute, Vol.15, pp. 1-15, 2005.

S. Pettit, and A. Beresford, “Critical success factors in the context of humanitarian aid supply chains”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol.39, No.6, pp. 450-468, 2009.

Council of Logistics Management., “Logistics Excellence: Vision, Processes, and People”, Council of Logistics Management 1998 Annual Conference, pp. 11-14, 1998.

B. M. Beamon, and B. Balcik, “Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chains”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 21, No.1, pp. 4-25, 2008.

C. G., Rawls and M. A. Turnquist, “Pre-positioning of emergency supplies for disaster response. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 44, pp. 616-628, 2010.

S. Y. Chou, H. Yoon, and C. Y. Shen, “a fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes ‘. European Journal of Operational Research, pp. 132-145, 2008.

C. Kahraman, U. Cebeci, and Z. Ulukan, “Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP”. Logistics Information Management, Vol. 16, No.6, pp. 382-394, 2003.

BPBD Sleman, https://bpbd.slemankab.go.id. [Acessed 15 June 2020].

S. Percin, “Fuzzy multi”criteria risk”benefit analysis of business process outsourcing (BPO)”. Information Management & Computer Security, Vol.16, No.3, pp. 213-234, 2008.

T. Chu, “Facility location selection using fuzzy TOPSIS under group decisions”, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol .10, No.6, pp. 687-701, 2002.

P. Degener, “Decision support for the location planning in disaster areas using multi-criteria methods”, Proceedings of the 10th International ISCRAM Conference - Baden-Baden, Germany, 2013.

H. Magdalena, “Sistem pendukung keputusan untuk menentukan mahasiswa lulusan terbaik di perguruan tinggi (studi kasus STMIK Atma Luhur Pangkalpinang)”, Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, pp. 49-56, 2012.

Z. Khakim, H. Hasyim, and R. Anwar, “Studi pemilihan pengerjaan beton antara pracetak dan konvensional pada pelaksanaan konstruksi gedung dengan metode AHP”, Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 95-107, 2011.

Na'am, “Sebuah tinjauan penggunaan metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) dalam sistem penunjang keputusan pada jurnal berbahasa Indonesia”, Jurnal MEDIASISFO, Vol. 11, No.2, pp. 888-895, 2017.

D. De La Fuente, “Determining warehouse number and location in spain by cluster analysis”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp.68-79, 1998.

S. R. Wurdianarto, S. Novianto, and U. Rosyidah, “Perbandingan euclidean distance dengan Canberra distance pada face recognition”, Jurnal Teknologi, Vol13, No.1, pp.31-37, 2014.

A. Sabiq, “Metode fuzzy AHP dan fuzzy TOPSIS untuk pemilihan Distro Linux”. Orbith, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 78-83, 2013.

B. Sodhi, and T. V. Prabhakar, A Simplified Description of Fuzzy TOPSIS”. Kanpur: Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, 2012.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).