Risk Assessment on Supply Chain of the Geographical Indication Granulated Coconut Sugar in Kulon Progo Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Elsa Yulian Sari (1), Adi Djoko Guritno (2), Anggoro Cahyo Sukartiko (3)
(1) Master Program in Agro-industrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
(2) Department of Agro-industrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
(3) Department of Agro-industrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Sari, Elsa Yulian, et al. “Risk Assessment on Supply Chain of the Geographical Indication Granulated Coconut Sugar in Kulon Progo Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, Feb. 2021, pp. 236-43, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.11.1.7923.
Granulated Coconut Sugar Kulon Progo Jogja, one of the certified geographical indication organic food products in Yogyakarta Special Region Indonesia, is produced and distributed through a supply chain, starting from farmers to exporters. Throughout its supply chain, there are risks to each tier affecting overall supply chain performance. Even though they have risks, not all tiers have the same vulnerability, depending on the ability of the risk owner to overcome them. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a vulnerability risk assessment of the certified coconut palm sugar in Kulon Progo Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. In-depth interviews with 54 risk owners throughout the product supply chain were then carried out using purposive and snowball samplings. The stages of risk assessment, starting from the identification, analysis, and evaluation of risks, were carried out using the ISO 31000:2009 framework. Risk categorization at the first assessment stage and mapping of expected loss and vulnerabilities at the second stage were carried out using the Rapid Agricultural Supply Chain Risk Assessment (RapAgRisk) instrument. The results showed that there were 35 risk events in the farmers, collectors, sub-Control Processing Units (sub-CPUs), Control Processing Units (CPUs), and Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) of sugar in Kulon Progo, which consisted of various risk categories, i.e., weather risk; natural disaster risk; biological and environmental risks; logistic and infrastructure risks; market risk; as well as management and operational risks. The risk events in the supply chain of the Granulated Coconut Sugar Kulon Progo have various degrees of vulnerability, starting from limited, low, moderate, highly, to extremely vulnerabilities. Risk events that are classified as limited vulnerability were considered acceptable, and the risk owner has been able to handle these risks well so that mitigation proposals were not given, while other risk events need to be mitigated to reduce their severities.

K. Srikaeo and R. Thongta, “Effects of sugarcane, palm sugar, coconut sugar and sorbitol on starch digestibility and physicochemical properties of wheat based foods,” Int. Food Res. J., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 923-929, 2015.

D. D. Putri, “Potential Development of Granulated Coconut Sugar Agroindustry in Kulon Progo Regency,” in Proceeding of The National Seminar Local Wisdom of Indonesian Batik Great Value for International Competitiveness, 2016, no. 10, pp. 1-6.

K. A-sun, B. Thumthanaruk, S. Lekhavat, and R. Jumnongpon, “Effect of spray drying conditions on physical characteristics of coconut sugar powder,” Int. Food Res. J., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1315-1319, 2015.

C. . Ho, W. M. . Aida, M. Y. Maskat, and H. Osman, “Effect of Thermal Processing of Palm Sap on the Physico-Chemical Composition of Traditional Palm Sugar,” Int. Food Res. J. 22(3) 923-929, 2015.

T. P. Trinidad, A. C. Mallillin, R. S. Sagum, and R. R. Encabo, “Glycemic index of commonly consumed carbohydrate foods in the Philippines,” J. Funct. Foods, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 271-274, 2010.

“FAOSTAT.” [Online]. Available: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. [Accessed: 10-Sep-2018].

C. Zuliana, E. Widyastuti, and W. H. Susanto, “Making Coconut Palm Sugar (Study of Coconut Sugar pH and Sodium Bicarbonate Concentration),” J. Pangan dan Agroindustri, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 109-119, 2016.

A. F. Mulyadi, “Feasibility Study of Establishment of Granulated Coconut Sugar Processing Units with Reprocessing System in Medium Scale Enterprise in Blitar District,” in Proceeding of the National Workshop on Empowering Potential Farmers’ Families for Poverty Alleviation, 2011, no. May.

I. nyoman Pujawan and Mahendrawathi, Supply Chain Management, 3rd ed. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2017.

D. Simchi-Levi, P. Kaminsky, and E. Simchi-Levi, Designing and Managing the Supply chain : concepts, strategies and case studies. McGraw-Hill International Edition, 2009.

S. Jaffee, P. Siegel, and C. Andrews, “Rapid Agricultural Supply Chain Risk Assessment: A Conceptual Framework,” Agric. Rural Dev., vol. Discussion, p. 64, 2010.

W. Septiani, Y. Herdiyeni, and L. Haditjaroko, “Method and Approach Mapping for Agri-food Supply Chain Risk Management : A literature review,” Int. J. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 51-64, 2016.

E. Y. Nyamah and Y. Jiang, “Agri-food supply chain performance: an empirical impact of risk,” Manag. Decis. Emerald Publ. Ltd., vol. Vol/. 55 N, 2017.

J. Heizer and R. Barry, Operations Management Sustainability and Supply Chain Management. England: Pearson Education Limited, 2014.

N. J. and A. M. Seyed Mahmoud Zanjirchi, “Risk-agility interactive model: a new look at agility drivers,” J. Model. Manag., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 690-711, 2016.

M. F. Blos, H. M. Wee, and W. Yang, “Chapter 12 Supply Chain Risk Management : Introduction to Risk in Supply Chain,” in Handbook on Decision Making, 2012, pp. 219-236.

N. E. Yeboah, Y. Feng, O.-S. Daniel, and N. B. Joseph, “Agricultural Supply Chain Risk Identification- A Case Finding from Ghana,” J. Manag. Strateg., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 31-48, 2014.

I. Fausayana, W. G. Abdullah, and Alumnir, “Identifying and mapping risks in the coconut brown sugar processing business,” AAB Bioflux, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2018.

Q. Qiang, A. Nagurney, and J. Dong, “Modeling of supply chain risk under disruptions with performance measurement and robustness analysis,” Manag. Supply Chain Risk Vulnerability, no. 2003, pp. 91-111, 2009.

G. Purdy, “ISO 31000:2009 - Setting a new standard for risk management: Perspective,” Risk Anal., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 881-886, 2010.

J. W. Creswell, Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative. England: Person Education, Inc., 2015.

S. Curkovic, T. Scannell, and B. Wagner, “ISO 31000 : 2009 Enterprise and Supply Chain Risk Management : A Longitudinal Study,” Am. J. Ind. Bus. Manag., vol. 3, pp. 614-630, 2013.

J. Johnson and V. Smith, “Adverse Impacts of Drought on Crops and Crop Producers in The West,” A J. West. Agric. Econ. Assoc., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 2-5, 2003.

J. R. Ziolkowska, “Socio-Economic Implications of Drought in the Agricultural Sector and the State Economy,” J. Econ., vol. 4, no. 19, pp. 1-11, 2016.

Wahyunto and Wasito, “Historical Trajectory of Merapi Eruption,” in Innovation-Based Agricultural Development in the Disaster Area of Merapi Eruption, Jakarta: Ministry of Agriculture (Indonesia), 2012, pp. 13-37.

M. E. Fitrianingrum and D. Ruslanjari, “Landslide Prone Zoning in Pagerharjo Village, Samigaluh Sub-District, Kulon Progo Regency, Yogyakarta,” J. Pendidik. Geogr., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 181-190, 2012.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).