DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.1.8459

Exploring the Use of Biometric Smart Cards for Voters’ Accreditation: A Case Study of Nigeria Electoral Process

Akande Noah Oluwatobi (1), Toba Paul Ayeni (2), Tayo Oladiran Arulogun (3), Adebiyi Ayodele Ariyo (4), Kayode Anthonia Aderonke (5)
(1) Data and Information Security Research Group, Computer Science Department, Landmark University, Kwara State, Nigeria
(2) Department of ICT/Voters’ Registry, Independent National Electoral Commission, Ekiti State, Nigeria
(3) 3Computer Science and Engineering Department, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Oyo State, Nigeria
(4) Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Covenant University, Ota. Nigeria
(5) Data and Information Security Research Group, Computer Science Department, Landmark University, Kwara State, Nigeria
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Oluwatobi, Akande Noah, et al. “Exploring the Use of Biometric Smart Cards for Voters’ Accreditation: A Case Study of Nigeria Electoral Process”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, Feb. 2020, pp. 80-89, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.10.1.8459.
Citation Format :
Voting remains an integral component of every democratic electoral process. it is an avenue for citizens to exercise their rights in order to elect those who will lead them in various vacant political offices. However, enhancing voters’ trust and confidence in electoral processes are significant factors that could encourage the active participation of citizens in elections. Eligible voters tend to decline to participate in an election when they have a feeling that their votes may not eventually count. Furthermore, electoral processes that lead to the emergence of candidates must be adjudged to be free, fair and credible to a high degree for the result to be widely acceptable. Unacceptable election results could lead to protests and total cancelation of the election thereby resulting in loss of time and resources invested in it. To ensure that only registered voters cast their votes on election days, measures must be put in place to accredit voters on election days effectively. Therefore, this article explores the use of biometric smart cards for voters’ verification and identification. With the Nigerian electoral process in view, the existing Nigerian voting procedure was reviewed, lapses were identified and solutions based on the use of the biometric smart card were proffered. If adopted, the proposed adoption of biometric smart cards for voters’ accreditation will enhance the country’s electoral process thereby ensuring that only registered voters cast their votes. The approach presented could also reduce the number of electoral processes and personnel required during election days, thus reducing voting time and cost.

Abosamra, K. M., Abdelhafez, A. A., Assassa, G. M. R., & Mursi, M. F. M. (2017). A practical, secure, and auditable e-voting system. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 36, 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2017.08.002

Adeshina, S. A., & Ojo, A. (2017). Factors for e-voting adoption - analysis of general elections in Nigeria. Government Information Quarterly, (November 2015), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.006

Adeshina, S. A., Ismaila, L. E., Ibrahim, K. U., & Ojo, A. (2017). Design and Implementation of Electronic Ballotting System; A case study of Nigeria. International Journal of Computer Techniques, 4(1), 1-8.

Agbu, O. (2016). Election Rigging and the Use of Technology: The Smart Card Reader as the Joker in Nigeria’s 2015 Presidential Election. Journal of African Ellections, 15(2), 90-111. https://doi.org/10.20940/JAE/2016/v15i

Akintoye, K. A., & Araoye, O. I. (2015). A Biometric E-voting Framework for Nigeria. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(13), 87-91.

Auyero, J., 2001. Poor People's Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.

Antonio D'Albore (2018), “How a Smart Card is made”, accessed on 1st March, 2018. Available on https://embeddedsecuritynews.com/2017/03/how-a-smart-card-is-made-part-2/

Bradburn, N., S. Sudman, E. Blair, and C. Stocking (1978). Question threat and response bias. Public Opinion Quarterly 42(2), 221-234.

Bratton, M. (2008). Vote buying and violence in Nigerian election campaigns q. Electoral Studies, 27(4), 621-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.04.013.

Bourlai T., Kittler J. and Messer K. (2010), "On Design and Optimization of a Face Verification System that is Smart-Card-Based", Journal of Machine Vision and Applications, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 695-711.

Carreras, M., & Irepo, Y. (2013). Trust in elections, vote-buying , and turnout in Latin America, 32, 609-619.

Chen T. P., Yau W. Y., and Jiang X. (2015), "Fast match-on-card technique using in-matcher clustering with ISO minutia template," International Journal of Biometrics, vol. 7, pp. 119-146.

Corstange, D., 2012. Vote trafficking in Lebanon. Int. J. Middle East Stud. 44 (3), 483-505.

Enoch, J. D., & Saturday, N. R. (2017). Biometric Online Voting System in Nigeria, (July). https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V49P104

Fernandez, E. B., La, D. L., & Pelí¡ez, J. I. (2013). A conceptual approach to secure electronic elections based on patterns. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.08.001

Hicken, A., Leider, S., Ravanilla, N., & Yang, D. (2017). Temptation in vote-selling: Evidence from a field experiment in the Philippines, 131(August 2016), 1-14.

INEC, (2019). INEC explains a-z about an electronic card reader. Retrieved from https://thewillnigeria.com/news/inec-explains-a-z-about-electronic-card-readers/ on 19th Feb 2019

INEC Manual for Election Officials (2015): Funded by the European Union through the UNDP Democratic Governance for Development (DGD II) Project.

Khemani, S. (2015). Buying votes versus supplying public services: Political incentives to under-invest in pro-poor policies. Journal of Development Economics, 117, 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.07.002

Kishor Krishnan Nair, Albert Helberg and Johannes van der Merwe (2016), “An Approach to Improve the Match-on-Card Fingerprint Authentication System security”, Sixth International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and its Applications (DICTAP), Pp. 119-125.

Kramon, E. (2016). Where is vote buying effective? Evidence from a list experiment in Kenya. Electoral Studies, 44, 397-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.09.006

Labonne, J., Chase, R., 2011. Do community-driven development projects enhance social capital? Evidence from the Philippines. J. Dev. Econ. 96 (2), 348-358.

Lehoucq, F., 2007. When does a market for votes emerge? In: Schaffer, F.C. (Ed.), Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying. Lynne Rienner Publishers, London, pp. 33-45

Li, C., Hwang, M., & Liu, C. (2008). An electronic voting protocol with deniable authentication for mobile ad hoc networks q. Computer Communications, 31, 2534-2540. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.comcom. 2008.03.018

Lust-Okar, E., 2006. Elections under authoritarianism: preliminary lessons from Jordan. Democratization 13 (3), 456-471.

Maria, L. (2008). Panama modernizes its national and voter ID system. Biometric Technology Today, (March), 2008.

Mohammed A. M. Abdullah, Al-Dulaimi F. H. A., Waleed Al-Nuaimy and Ali Al-Ataby (2015), “Smart card with iris recognition for high-security access environment”, Proceedings in 1st Middle East Conference on Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Explore, Pp. 382-385.

Magaloni, B., 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Mikail, O. O., & Arulogun, T. (2018). Bio-Cryptographic Technique for Secure Electronic Voting System Bio-Crystographic Technique for Secure Electronic Voting System. Advances in Electrical and Telecommunication Engineering, 1(2), 55-64.

Nemeslaki, A., Aranyossy, M., & Sasví¡ri, P. (2016). Could on-line voting boost the desire to vote? - Technology acceptance perceptions of young Hungarian citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 705-714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.11.003

Nichter, S. (2014). Conceptualizing vote-buying. JELS, 35, 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.02.008

Okediran, O. O., & Ganiyu, R. A. (2015). A Framework for Electronic Voting in Nigeria. International Journal of Computer Applications, 129(3), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2015906786

Omolaye, P. O., Daniel, P., & Orifa, A. O. (2015). Systemic Evaluation of Semi-Electronic Voting System adopted in Nigeria 2015 General Elections, 3(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajis-3-1-2

Olaniyi, O. M., Folorunso, T. A., Ahmed, A., & Joseph, O. (2016). Design of Secure Electronic Voting System Using Fingerprint Biometrics and Crypto- Watermarking Approach. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 5(September), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijieeb.2016.05.02

Philippe, W.-G. (2006). Mexico deploys multi-biometric voting system. Biometric Technology Today.

Pujol-ahullo, J., Castella, J., Viejo, A., & Jardı, R. (2012). Study on poll-site voting and verification systems, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2012.08.001

Qadah, G. Z., & Taha, R. (2007). Electronic voting systems: Requirements, design, and implementation, 29, 376-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2006.06.001

Rae, L., Ann, L., Hall, T. E., Saunders, K. L., & Alvarez, R. M. (2010). A new barrier to participation: Heterogeneous application of voter identification policies. Electoral Studies, 29(1), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2009.08.001

Sandholt, P., & Justesen, M. K. (2014). Poverty and vote-buying : Survey-based evidence from Africa, 33, 220-232.

Schaffer, Frederic C., 2005. Clean elections and the great unwashed: vote-buying and voter education in the Philippines. Paper Number 21, April 2005. School of Social Science, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ.

Schaffer, Frederic C., 2007. Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote buying. In: Schaffer, Frederic C. (Ed.), Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, CO.

Stokes, S., 2005. Perverse accountability: a formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99 (3), 315-325.

Tamezheneal R., Sumathi S. (2017), “Implementation of the biometric smart card using multibiometrics”, Proceedings of International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics, IEEE Explore, Pp. 777-782, Pp. 1-5

United Nations, (2017). World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables (No. ESA/P/WP/248.).

Uzedhe, G. O., & Okhaifoh, J. E. (2016). A Technological Framework for Transparent E-Voting Solution in the Nigerian Electoral System. Nigerian Journal of Technology (NIJOTECH), 35(3), 627-636.

Victor Teoh De Zhi and Shahrel Azmin Suandi (2015), “FingerCode for identity verification using fingerprint and smart card”, Proceedings in 10th Asian Control Conference (ASCC), Pp.1-6.

Vibert B., Rosenberger C., and Ninassi A. (2013), "Security and performance evaluation platform of a biometric match on the card," World Congress on Computer and Information Technology (WCCIT), pp. 1-6.

Wang, C.S., Kurzman, C., 2007. The logistics: how to buy votes. In: Schaffer, F.C. (Ed.), Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying. Lynne Rienner Publishers, London, pp. 61-78.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).