Appropriate Technology of Post Harvest Broccoli Quality Produced in Indonesia

Nurpilihan Bafdal (1), Carmencita Tjahjadi (2), Debby Sumanti Moodi (3), Totok Pujianto (4), Seok-In Hong (5), Dongman Kim (6)
(1) Faculty of Agricultural Industrial Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km.21, Sumedang, 43563, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Agricultural Industrial Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km.21, Sumedang, 43563, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Agricultural Industrial Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km.21, Sumedang, 43563, Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Agricultural Industrial Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km.21, Sumedang, 43563, Indonesia
(5) The Korean Food Research Institute (KFRI), Korea
(6) The Korean Food Research Institute (KFRI), Korea
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Bafdal, Nurpilihan, et al. “Appropriate Technology of Post Harvest Broccoli Quality Produced in Indonesia”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 9, no. 5, Oct. 2019, pp. 1605-10, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.9.5.9962.
Broccoli is a highly economic crop in Indonesia, it is rich in vitamin and mineral and is a good source of vitamin A;  Pottasium; Folic acid ; Iron and Fiber.The best grows  of broccoli in area with a cool climate or high land; in West Java  cultivated of broccoli were at Lembang and Pangalengan. Broccoli is cultivated for its curd which should be dark green in color. The curd has diameter of 5-25 cm depending on soil conditions and variety.  Head of broccoli must be entirely green and all flower buds must be completely closed to be desirable. Quality factors for broccoli consist of curd density, greenness, and  absence of blemishes.The problem of broccoli is post harvest handling without appropriate technology and handling is still carried out by traditional method without hardly any starting or grading prior . The quality of the product can not be improved by post-harvest handling a lone, but is necessary for extending shelf-life. Post harvest handling covers the time span from product harvesting in the farm field until it  reaches the urban consumer through the market  The two main objectives of applying appropriate technology of post harvest of broccoli are to maintain quality and reduce losses between harvest and consumption A descriptive experiment  method was done and regression analysis consisting of two variables (dependent and independent) were employed with five treatments. The results showed were all treatment gave various results depend of packaging in a sealed and temperature. Low storage temperature in broccoli more important than type of packaging in maintaining sensory characteristics of the curd and reducing weight loss as well as decay scores. LPDE bag was best cold storage of broccoli curds.

J. O. Fisher, J. A. Mennella, S. O. Hughes, Y. Liu, P. M. Mendoza, and H. Patrick, “Offering ‘dip’ promotes intake of a moderately-liked raw vegetable among preschoolers with genetic sensitivity to bitterness,” J. Acad. Nutr. Diet., 2012.

M. M. Kushad et al., “Variation of glucosinolates in vegetable crops of Brassica oleracea,” J. Agric. Food Chem., 1999.

E. H. Jeffery et al., “Variation in content of bioactive components in broccoli,” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2003.

N. Bafdal, C. Tjahjadi, S.-I. Hong, D. Kim, D. S. Moody, and T. Pujianto, “Packaging Optimization for Transporting Broccoli at Low Temperature,” 2007.

E. Ordiales et al., “Characteristics Defining Broccoli Cultivars from Different Seed Producers,” Int. J. Agron., vol. 2017, 2017.

K. P. Lattí©, K. E. Appel, and A. Lampen, “Health benefits and possible risks of broccoli - An overview,” Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2011.

M. L. Lemoine, P. M. Civello, G. A. Martí­nez, and A. R. Chaves, “Influence of postharvest UV-C treatment on refrigerated storage of minimally processed broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. Italica),” J. Sci. Food Agric., 2007.

T. Sun, J. R. Powers, and J. Tang, “Evaluation of the antioxidant activity of asparagus, broccoli and their juices,” Food Chem., 2007.

D. A. Moreno, M. Carvajal, C. López-Berenguer, and C. Garcí­a-Viguera, “Chemical and biological characterisation of nutraceutical compounds of broccoli,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2006.

D. Zhang and Y. Hamauzu, “Phenolics, ascorbic acid, carotenoids and antioxidant activity of broccoli and their changes during conventional and microwave cooking,” Food Chem., 2004.

A. GliszczyÅ„ska-ÅšwigÅ‚o, E. Ciska, K. Pawlak-LemaÅ„ska, J. Chmielewski, T. Borkowski, and B. Tyrakowska, “Changes in the content of health-promoting compounds and antioxidant activity of broccoli after domestic processing,” Food Addit. Contam., 2006.

J. A. Villa-Rodriguez, H. Palafox-Carlos, E. M. Yahia, J. F. Ayala-Zavala, and G. A. Gonzalez-Aguilar, “Maintaining Antioxidant Potential of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables After Harvest,” Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 2015.

K. C. Gross, C. Y. Wang, and M. E. Saltveit, “The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks,” Agric. Res. Serv. United States Dep. Agric., 2016.

J. C. Heaton and K. Jones, “Microbial contamination of fruit and vegetables and the behaviour of enteropathogens in the phyllosphere: A review,” Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2008.

M. E. Saltveit, “Effect of ethylene on quality of fresh fruits and vegetables,” Postharvest Biol. Technol., 1999.

P. M. A. Toivonen, “Postharvest physiology of fruits and vegetables,” in Postharvest Ripening Physiology of Crops, 2016.

M. Schreiner and S. Huyskens-Keil, “Phytochemicals in fruit and vegetables: Health promotion and postharvest elicitors,” Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 2006.

M. C. do N. Nunes, Color Atlas of Postharvest Quality of Fruits and Vegetables. 2008.

S. M. Aleid, “Postharvest Physiology, Processing and Packaging,” in Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, 2012.

M. S. Aghdam, L. Sevillano, F. B. Flores, and S. Bodbodak, “Heat shock proteins as biochemical markers for postharvest chilling stress in fruits and vegetables,” Scientia Horticulturae. 2013.

S. Shultz, “Broccoli,” J. Agric. Food Inf., 2013.

L. Kitinoja, S. Saran, S. K. Roy, and A. A. Kader, “Postharvest technology for developing countries: Challenges and opportunities in research, outreach and advocacy,” J. Sci. Food Agric., 2011.

M. V. Alvarez, A. G. Ponce, and M. del R. Moreira, “Antimicrobial efficiency of chitosan coating enriched with bioactive compounds to improve the safety of fresh cut broccoli,” LWT - Food Sci. Technol., 2013.

A. R. Vicente, G. A. Manganaris, G. O. Sozzi, and C. H. Crisosto, “Nutritional Quality of Fruits and Vegetables,” in Postharvest Handling, 2009.

A. A. Kader and D. M. Holcroft, “Postharvest: An Introduction to the Physiology and Handling of Fruit, Vegetables and Ornamentals,” Horttechnology, 2018.

S. K. Lee and A. A. Kader, “Preharvest and postharvest factors influencing vitamin C content of horticultural crops,” Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2000.

W. Florkowski, R. Shewfelt, B. Brueckner, and S. E. Prussia, Postharvest Handling. 2009.

G. B. Seymour, “Postharvest technology of horticultural crops,” Postharvest Biol. Technol., 1993.

H. R. El-Ramady, í‰. Domokos-Szabolcsy, N. A. Abdalla, H. S. Taha, and M. Fí¡ri, “Postharvest Management of Fruits and Vegetables Storage,” 2015.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).