Increasing the Quantity and Quality of GeNose 19 Medical Device Gaskets Using Piercing Tools

Ampala Khoryanton (1), Wahyu Isti Nugroho (2), Frika Ayu Fitrianti Sugiono (3), Rafii Labib Al Hassan (4)
(1) Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Semarang, Tembalang, 50275, Semarang, Indonesia
(2) Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Semarang, Tembalang, 50275, Semarang, Indonesia
(3) Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Semarang, Tembalang, 50275, Semarang, Indonesia
(4) Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Semarang, Tembalang, 50275, Semarang, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Khoryanton, Ampala, et al. “Increasing the Quantity and Quality of GeNose 19 Medical Device Gaskets Using Piercing Tools”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 14, no. 1, Feb. 2024, pp. 99-106, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.14.1.19393.
The Ge Nose C19 medical device gasket is a product from a manufacturing company in Yogya. Gaskets must be of good quality to ensure vacuum or prevent air leakage from entering the test chamber. The core problem in the production process is the quality problem of many rejects and the quantity not yet meeting the production target. The observation results show that the gasket reject problem is found in the four holes that are formed, which do not match the dimensions or are torn. Making four holes in the gasket made from neoprene rubber is done through a drilling process, which can risk tearing or damage. The type of drill bit used can affect the success of drilling gasket holes. The process of making four holes in the gasket using the piercing method is thought to be able to increase the quality and quantity of gasket products. This research aims to increase the quantity and quality of Ge Nose 19 medical device gaskets using a piercing tool. Research methods include problem identification, literature study, design, manufacture, and testing of piercing tools. The test parameters are time and product quality, namely the shape and position of the hole. The results of this research show a reduction in the cycle time of the hole-making process by 53.7%, so production capacity has increased by 51.8%. The quality of gasket production has increased; of the 40 samples tested, 0 gaskets were rejected.

J. S. Klinton, C. Oga-Omenka, and P. Heitkamp, “TB and COVID – Public and private health sectors adapt to a new reality,” J. Clin. Tuberc. Other Mycobact. Dis., vol. 21, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.jctube.2020.100199.

A. Rehman, H. Xing, M. Adnan khan, M. Hussain, A. Hussain, and N. Gulzar, “Emerging technologies for COVID (ET-CoV) detection and diagnosis: Recent advancements, applications, challenges, and future perspectives,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 83, no. June 2022, p. 104642, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104642.

S. N. Hidayat et al., “Hybrid learning method based on feature clustering and scoring for enhanced COVID-19 breath analysis by an electronic nose,” Artif. Intell. Med., vol. 129, no. December 2021, p. 102323, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102323.

S. Elisseeva, E. Santovito, E. Linehan, J. P. Kerry, and D. B. Papkovsky, “Performance assessment of the two oxygen sensor based respirometric platforms with complex media and in selective bacterial assays,” Sensors Actuators B Chem., vol. 383, no. September 2022, p. 133582, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133582.

N. Rosa, A. R. Gaspar, J. J. Costa, A. G. Lopes, J. Sabino Pais, and M. G. da Silva, “Experimental assessment of an air curtain-sealed personal protective equipment for medical care: Influence of breathing and thermal plume,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., vol. 148, no. January, p. 110955, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2023.110955.

M. Ganesapillai et al., “The face behind the Covid-19 mask — A comprehensive review,” Environ. Technol. Innov., vol. 28, p. 102837, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102837.

P. Kaliyappan, M. Dhananchezian, and K. Rajkumar, “Utilization of waste tyre rubber and carbon black to develop a neoprene rubber hybrid composite,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 27, pp. 724–728, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.307.

H. H. Hassanalideh and S. Gholampour, “Finding the optimal drill bit material and proper drilling condition for utilization in the programming of robot-assisted drilling of bone,” CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., vol. 31, pp. 34–47, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.09.011.

M. Uhl, J. H. Robens, M. Gauch, R. Germann, and S. Matthiesen, “Factors on vibrational harm during hammer drilling – Influences of lateral force, feed force, hammer drill and drill bit type,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., vol. 94, no. December 2022, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103418.

P. S. Mahankar and A. S. Dhoble, “Review of hydraulic seal failures due to effect of medium to high temperature,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 127, no. June, p. 105552, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105552.

H. Jiang, Y. Liao, S. Gao, G. Li, and J. Cui, “Comparative study on joining quality of electromagnetic driven self-piecing riveting, adhesive and hybrid joints for Al/steel structure,” Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 164, no. December 2020, p. 107903, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.tws.2021.107903.

S. Shirzadian, S. Bhowmick, and A. T. Alpas, “Characterization of galling during dry and lubricated punching of AA5754 sheet,” Adv. Ind. Manuf. Eng., vol. 3, p. 100064, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.aime.2021.100064.

J. Wang et al., “A self-piercing riveting method for joining of continuous carbon fiber reinforced composite and aluminum alloy sheets,” Compos. Struct., vol. 259, no. September 2020, p. 113219, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113219.

H. Zhao, L. Han, Y. Liu, and X. Liu, “Analysis of joint formation mechanisms for self-piercing riveting (SPR) process with varying joining parameters,” J. Manuf. Process., vol. 73, no. September 2021, pp. 668–685, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.11.038.

G. Huang, T. Yang, Z. He, L. Yu, and H. Xiao, “Polyurethane as a modifier for road asphalt: A literature review,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 356, no. June, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129058.

P. Y. Le Gac, P. A. Albouy, B. Fayolle, and J. Verdu, “Relationship between macromolecular network and fatigue properties of unfilled polychloroprene rubber,” Polym. Degrad. Stab., vol. 192, p. 109669, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2021.109669.

S. Sharma, P. Sudhakara, S. K. Misra, and J. Singh, “A comprehensive review of current developments on the waste-reinforced polymer-matrix composites for automotive, sports goods and construction applications: Materials, processes and properties,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 33, pp. 1671–1679, 2019, doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.523.

P. Herrera, E. Hernandez-Nava, R. Thornton, and T. Slatter, “Abrasive wear resistance of Ti-6AL-4V obtained by the conventional manufacturing process and by electron beam melting (EBM),” Wear, vol. 524–525, no. April, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2023.204879.

N. Mandlekar, M. Joshi, and B. S. Butola, “A review on specialty elastomers based potential inflatable structures and applications,” Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 33–45, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.05.004.

I. Hossain, M. T. Islam, M. Samsuzzaman, H. Alsaif, H. Rmili, and M. S. Soliman, “Dielectric characterization of Mg–Zn ferrite-based high permittivity flexible substrate for SNG metamaterial,” J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 24, pp. 879–894, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.058.

P. Esmaeilpour, A. Mamazizi, and G. S. P. Madabhushi, “An overview of the model container types in physical modeling of geotechnical problems,” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., vol. 168, no. July 2022, p. 107827, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107827.

F. Zuhdi and R. S. Anggraini, “The Indonesian Natural Rubber Export Competitiveness in Global Market,” Int. J. Agric. Syst., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 130–139, 2020, doi: 10.20956/ijas.v8i2.2518.

M. A. Budiyanto and M. H. Lubis, “Physical reviews of solar radiation models for estimating global solar radiation in Indonesia,” Energy Reports, vol. 6, pp. 1206–1211, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.053.

G. Kim, B. R. Denos, and R. Sterkenburg, “Influence of different piercing methods of abrasive waterjet on delamination of fiber reinforced composite laminate,” Compos. Struct., vol. 240, no. August 2019, p. 112065, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112065.

D. Qin and C. Chen, “Research on the mechanical property and failure mechanism of the dieless clinched joints of various aluminum alloys,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 137, no. April, p. 106384, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106384.

V. Naranje and S. Kumar, “A knowledge based system for automated design of deep drawing die for axisymmetric parts,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 41, no. 4 PART 1, pp. 1419–1431, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.041.

L. Anggraini, J. Ginting, T. Nola, and K. Takagi, “Efficiency enhancement of die design for G2R-1A relay terminal using progressive tool,” Mater. Today Proc., no. xxxx, pp. 1–7, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.623.

X. Ran, C. Chen, H. Zhang, and Y. Ouyang, “Investigation of the clinching process with rectangle punch,” Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 166, no. June, p. 108034, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108034.

Y. Zheng, W. Yuan, X. Liang, and G. Wang, “Surface tension effect on the sliding inception between an elastic sphere and a rigid flat,” Mech. Mater., vol. 174, no. September, p. 104477, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2022.104477.

F. Kappe, C. Zirngibl, B. Schleich, M. Bobbert, S. Wartzack, and G. Meschut, “Determining the influence of different process parameters on the versatile self-piercing riveting process using numerical methods,” J. Manuf. Process., vol. 84, no. November, pp. 1438–1448, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.11.019.

R. F. Liu and J. C. Wang, “Application of finite element method to effect of weld overlay residual stress on probability of piping failure,” Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., vol. 200, no. September, p. 104812, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104812.

N. Karathanasopoulos, K. S. Pandya, and D. Mohr, “An experimental and numerical investigation of the role of rivet and die design on the self-piercing riveting joint characteristics of aluminum and steel sheets,” J. Manuf. Process., vol. 69, no. June, pp. 290–302, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.07.049.

L. Giorleo and E. Ceretti, “Deep drawing punches produced using fused filament fabrication technology: Performance evaluation,” J. Manuf. Process., vol. 84, no. March, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.09.054.

R. J. Lancaster, S. P. Jeffs, B. J. Haigh, and N. C. Barnard, “Derivation of material properties using small punch and shear punch test methods,” Mater. Des., vol. 215, p. 110473, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110473.

B. Isufi, I. Cismasiu, R. Marreiros, A. Pinho Ramos, and V. Lúcio, “Role of punching shear reinforcement in the seismic performance of flat slab frames,” Eng. Struct., vol. 207, no. September 2019, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110238.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).