Cite Article

The Comparison Between 2-D and 3-D Slope Stability Analysis Based on Reinforcement Requirements

Choose citation format

BibTeX

@article{IJASEIT12815,
   author = {P.T.K. Sari and Y.E. Putri and Y.R. Savitri and A.R. Amalia and Nastasia F. Margini and D.A.D. Nusantara},
   title = {The Comparison Between 2-D and 3-D Slope Stability Analysis Based on Reinforcement Requirements},
   journal = {International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology},
   volume = {10},
   number = {5},
   year = {2020},
   pages = {2082--2088},
   keywords = {slope stability; 3-D landslide; 2-D landslide; geotextile reinforcement.},
   abstract = {

The landslides in the field often do not have an infinite length, making 3-dimensional assumptions more appropriate for the design. Meanwhile, they are mostly analyzed in design by assuming the landslides occur infinitely with plane strain in a 2-dimensional approach. This assumption becomes less precise due to the consideration of the safety factor based on 2-dimensional conditions while the landslide happens 3-dimensional, and this has further effects on the need for reinforcement. This research was conducted to determine the level of influence 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional landslide safety factors have on the number of reinforcements required. A limit equilibrium method was used in the study. The number of geotextile reinforcement needs with a 3-dimensional sliding model is calculated based on existing research results. The results are then compared with the amount of geotextile reinforcement required with a 2-dimensional sliding model. The results showed the possibility of having the same amount of reinforcement under 2-D and 3-D assumptions in the homogeneous soil, while different results were found with heterogeneous soil layers due to the variations in soil conditions. Comparison of the number of geotextile reinforcement requirements between 2 dimensions and three dimensions still needs to be further developed by using more varied soil data. This is done considering that existing studies are only limited to soil, which tends to be homogeneous.

},    issn = {2088-5334},    publisher = {INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development},    url = {http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=12815},    doi = {10.18517/ijaseit.10.5.12815} }

EndNote

%A Sari, P.T.K.
%A Putri, Y.E.
%A Savitri, Y.R.
%A Amalia, A.R.
%A Margini, Nastasia F.
%A Nusantara, D.A.D.
%D 2020
%T The Comparison Between 2-D and 3-D Slope Stability Analysis Based on Reinforcement Requirements
%B 2020
%9 slope stability; 3-D landslide; 2-D landslide; geotextile reinforcement.
%! The Comparison Between 2-D and 3-D Slope Stability Analysis Based on Reinforcement Requirements
%K slope stability; 3-D landslide; 2-D landslide; geotextile reinforcement.
%X 

The landslides in the field often do not have an infinite length, making 3-dimensional assumptions more appropriate for the design. Meanwhile, they are mostly analyzed in design by assuming the landslides occur infinitely with plane strain in a 2-dimensional approach. This assumption becomes less precise due to the consideration of the safety factor based on 2-dimensional conditions while the landslide happens 3-dimensional, and this has further effects on the need for reinforcement. This research was conducted to determine the level of influence 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional landslide safety factors have on the number of reinforcements required. A limit equilibrium method was used in the study. The number of geotextile reinforcement needs with a 3-dimensional sliding model is calculated based on existing research results. The results are then compared with the amount of geotextile reinforcement required with a 2-dimensional sliding model. The results showed the possibility of having the same amount of reinforcement under 2-D and 3-D assumptions in the homogeneous soil, while different results were found with heterogeneous soil layers due to the variations in soil conditions. Comparison of the number of geotextile reinforcement requirements between 2 dimensions and three dimensions still needs to be further developed by using more varied soil data. This is done considering that existing studies are only limited to soil, which tends to be homogeneous.

%U http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=12815 %R doi:10.18517/ijaseit.10.5.12815 %J International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology %V 10 %N 5 %@ 2088-5334

IEEE

P.T.K. Sari,Y.E. Putri,Y.R. Savitri,A.R. Amalia,Nastasia F. Margini and D.A.D. Nusantara,"The Comparison Between 2-D and 3-D Slope Stability Analysis Based on Reinforcement Requirements," International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 2082-2088, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.5.12815.

RefMan/ProCite (RIS)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Sari, P.T.K.
AU  - Putri, Y.E.
AU  - Savitri, Y.R.
AU  - Amalia, A.R.
AU  - Margini, Nastasia F.
AU  - Nusantara, D.A.D.
PY  - 2020
TI  - The Comparison Between 2-D and 3-D Slope Stability Analysis Based on Reinforcement Requirements
JF  - International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology; Vol. 10 (2020) No. 5
Y2  - 2020
SP  - 2082
EP  - 2088
SN  - 2088-5334
PB  - INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
KW  - slope stability; 3-D landslide; 2-D landslide; geotextile reinforcement.
N2  - 

The landslides in the field often do not have an infinite length, making 3-dimensional assumptions more appropriate for the design. Meanwhile, they are mostly analyzed in design by assuming the landslides occur infinitely with plane strain in a 2-dimensional approach. This assumption becomes less precise due to the consideration of the safety factor based on 2-dimensional conditions while the landslide happens 3-dimensional, and this has further effects on the need for reinforcement. This research was conducted to determine the level of influence 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional landslide safety factors have on the number of reinforcements required. A limit equilibrium method was used in the study. The number of geotextile reinforcement needs with a 3-dimensional sliding model is calculated based on existing research results. The results are then compared with the amount of geotextile reinforcement required with a 2-dimensional sliding model. The results showed the possibility of having the same amount of reinforcement under 2-D and 3-D assumptions in the homogeneous soil, while different results were found with heterogeneous soil layers due to the variations in soil conditions. Comparison of the number of geotextile reinforcement requirements between 2 dimensions and three dimensions still needs to be further developed by using more varied soil data. This is done considering that existing studies are only limited to soil, which tends to be homogeneous.

UR - http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=12815 DO - 10.18517/ijaseit.10.5.12815

RefWorks

RT Journal Article
ID 12815
A1 Sari, P.T.K.
A1 Putri, Y.E.
A1 Savitri, Y.R.
A1 Amalia, A.R.
A1 Margini, Nastasia F.
A1 Nusantara, D.A.D.
T1 The Comparison Between 2-D and 3-D Slope Stability Analysis Based on Reinforcement Requirements
JF International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology
VO 10
IS 5
YR 2020
SP 2082
OP 2088
SN 2088-5334
PB INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
K1 slope stability; 3-D landslide; 2-D landslide; geotextile reinforcement.
AB 

The landslides in the field often do not have an infinite length, making 3-dimensional assumptions more appropriate for the design. Meanwhile, they are mostly analyzed in design by assuming the landslides occur infinitely with plane strain in a 2-dimensional approach. This assumption becomes less precise due to the consideration of the safety factor based on 2-dimensional conditions while the landslide happens 3-dimensional, and this has further effects on the need for reinforcement. This research was conducted to determine the level of influence 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional landslide safety factors have on the number of reinforcements required. A limit equilibrium method was used in the study. The number of geotextile reinforcement needs with a 3-dimensional sliding model is calculated based on existing research results. The results are then compared with the amount of geotextile reinforcement required with a 2-dimensional sliding model. The results showed the possibility of having the same amount of reinforcement under 2-D and 3-D assumptions in the homogeneous soil, while different results were found with heterogeneous soil layers due to the variations in soil conditions. Comparison of the number of geotextile reinforcement requirements between 2 dimensions and three dimensions still needs to be further developed by using more varied soil data. This is done considering that existing studies are only limited to soil, which tends to be homogeneous.

LK http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=12815 DO - 10.18517/ijaseit.10.5.12815