Cite Article

Intellectual Capital: A Comparative View between Enterprises and Universities

Choose citation format

BibTeX

@article{IJASEIT3253,
   author = {Vanessa Paola Pertuz Peralta and Adith Bismarck Perez Orozco and Neida Coromoto Boscán Romero and Maribel Del socorro Bermudez Rojo and Carlos Solorzano Bastidas},
   title = {Intellectual Capital: A Comparative View between Enterprises and Universities},
   journal = {International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology},
   volume = {8},
   number = {2},
   year = {2018},
   pages = {350--357},
   keywords = {Intellectual Capital, comparative view, universities, enterprises.},
   abstract = {This paper analyses the approaches of intellectual capital in enterprises and universities. It aims to the conceptualization, classification, and measurement of intellectual capital, and then it compares both approaches. The research is supported by the theories of Fazlagic [15], Alama [1], Molina [19], Sanchez, Elena and Castrillo [26], Paździor and Paździor [23] and Bratianu [7]. The study is done through bibliometrics, using a kind of descriptive, documentary research; with a non-experimental, and transversal design. The population is finite and represented by papers, conference proceedings, and thesis published between 2005-2014. To collect the primary data was used the direct observation technique, through concept analysis. We conclude, based on the results, generally, enterprises use the paradigm of fixed capital, focus on relational capital, while in universities the paradigms changed to the dynamic, Newtonian, integrating and transformational intellectual capital, based on human capital. Additionally, that as much as in the universities as in the enterprises the intellectual capital improved the performance of the organization, thus, the revision of the literature states that the results generated by the effective management of the intellectual capital are sustained in the time because of its immaterial nature. Moreover, in the enterprises, the predominant components correspond to the relational capital such as clients, suppliers, strategic alliances and the company reputation in front of the clients, which are essential for the generation of knowledge and the development of innovation.},
   issn = {2088-5334},
   publisher = {INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development},
   url = {http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=3253},
   doi = {10.18517/ijaseit.8.2.3253}
}

EndNote

%A Pertuz Peralta, Vanessa Paola
%A Perez Orozco, Adith Bismarck
%A Boscán Romero, Neida Coromoto
%A Bermudez Rojo, Maribel Del socorro
%A Solorzano Bastidas, Carlos
%D 2018
%T Intellectual Capital: A Comparative View between Enterprises and Universities
%B 2018
%9 Intellectual Capital, comparative view, universities, enterprises.
%! Intellectual Capital: A Comparative View between Enterprises and Universities
%K Intellectual Capital, comparative view, universities, enterprises.
%X This paper analyses the approaches of intellectual capital in enterprises and universities. It aims to the conceptualization, classification, and measurement of intellectual capital, and then it compares both approaches. The research is supported by the theories of Fazlagic [15], Alama [1], Molina [19], Sanchez, Elena and Castrillo [26], Paździor and Paździor [23] and Bratianu [7]. The study is done through bibliometrics, using a kind of descriptive, documentary research; with a non-experimental, and transversal design. The population is finite and represented by papers, conference proceedings, and thesis published between 2005-2014. To collect the primary data was used the direct observation technique, through concept analysis. We conclude, based on the results, generally, enterprises use the paradigm of fixed capital, focus on relational capital, while in universities the paradigms changed to the dynamic, Newtonian, integrating and transformational intellectual capital, based on human capital. Additionally, that as much as in the universities as in the enterprises the intellectual capital improved the performance of the organization, thus, the revision of the literature states that the results generated by the effective management of the intellectual capital are sustained in the time because of its immaterial nature. Moreover, in the enterprises, the predominant components correspond to the relational capital such as clients, suppliers, strategic alliances and the company reputation in front of the clients, which are essential for the generation of knowledge and the development of innovation.
%U http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=3253
%R doi:10.18517/ijaseit.8.2.3253
%J International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology
%V 8
%N 2
%@ 2088-5334

IEEE

Vanessa Paola Pertuz Peralta,Adith Bismarck Perez Orozco,Neida Coromoto Boscán Romero,Maribel Del socorro Bermudez Rojo and Carlos Solorzano Bastidas,"Intellectual Capital: A Comparative View between Enterprises and Universities," International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 350-357, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.8.2.3253.

RefMan/ProCite (RIS)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pertuz Peralta, Vanessa Paola
AU  - Perez Orozco, Adith Bismarck
AU  - Boscán Romero, Neida Coromoto
AU  - Bermudez Rojo, Maribel Del socorro
AU  - Solorzano Bastidas, Carlos
PY  - 2018
TI  - Intellectual Capital: A Comparative View between Enterprises and Universities
JF  - International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology; Vol. 8 (2018) No. 2
Y2  - 2018
SP  - 350
EP  - 357
SN  - 2088-5334
PB  - INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
KW  - Intellectual Capital, comparative view, universities, enterprises.
N2  - This paper analyses the approaches of intellectual capital in enterprises and universities. It aims to the conceptualization, classification, and measurement of intellectual capital, and then it compares both approaches. The research is supported by the theories of Fazlagic [15], Alama [1], Molina [19], Sanchez, Elena and Castrillo [26], Paździor and Paździor [23] and Bratianu [7]. The study is done through bibliometrics, using a kind of descriptive, documentary research; with a non-experimental, and transversal design. The population is finite and represented by papers, conference proceedings, and thesis published between 2005-2014. To collect the primary data was used the direct observation technique, through concept analysis. We conclude, based on the results, generally, enterprises use the paradigm of fixed capital, focus on relational capital, while in universities the paradigms changed to the dynamic, Newtonian, integrating and transformational intellectual capital, based on human capital. Additionally, that as much as in the universities as in the enterprises the intellectual capital improved the performance of the organization, thus, the revision of the literature states that the results generated by the effective management of the intellectual capital are sustained in the time because of its immaterial nature. Moreover, in the enterprises, the predominant components correspond to the relational capital such as clients, suppliers, strategic alliances and the company reputation in front of the clients, which are essential for the generation of knowledge and the development of innovation.
UR  - http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=3253
DO  - 10.18517/ijaseit.8.2.3253

RefWorks

RT Journal Article
ID 3253
A1 Pertuz Peralta, Vanessa Paola
A1 Perez Orozco, Adith Bismarck
A1 Boscán Romero, Neida Coromoto
A1 Bermudez Rojo, Maribel Del socorro
A1 Solorzano Bastidas, Carlos
T1 Intellectual Capital: A Comparative View between Enterprises and Universities
JF International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology
VO 8
IS 2
YR 2018
SP 350
OP 357
SN 2088-5334
PB INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
K1 Intellectual Capital, comparative view, universities, enterprises.
AB This paper analyses the approaches of intellectual capital in enterprises and universities. It aims to the conceptualization, classification, and measurement of intellectual capital, and then it compares both approaches. The research is supported by the theories of Fazlagic [15], Alama [1], Molina [19], Sanchez, Elena and Castrillo [26], Paździor and Paździor [23] and Bratianu [7]. The study is done through bibliometrics, using a kind of descriptive, documentary research; with a non-experimental, and transversal design. The population is finite and represented by papers, conference proceedings, and thesis published between 2005-2014. To collect the primary data was used the direct observation technique, through concept analysis. We conclude, based on the results, generally, enterprises use the paradigm of fixed capital, focus on relational capital, while in universities the paradigms changed to the dynamic, Newtonian, integrating and transformational intellectual capital, based on human capital. Additionally, that as much as in the universities as in the enterprises the intellectual capital improved the performance of the organization, thus, the revision of the literature states that the results generated by the effective management of the intellectual capital are sustained in the time because of its immaterial nature. Moreover, in the enterprises, the predominant components correspond to the relational capital such as clients, suppliers, strategic alliances and the company reputation in front of the clients, which are essential for the generation of knowledge and the development of innovation.
LK http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=3253
DO  - 10.18517/ijaseit.8.2.3253