Cite Article

Some Weeds Community Percent in Response to Pumice Application on Soil under Water Stress Conditions

Choose citation format

BibTeX

@article{IJASEIT658,
   author = {Davoud Zarehaghi and Mehdi Nasiri and Mohammad Reza Neyshabouri},
   title = {Some Weeds Community Percent in Response to Pumice Application on Soil under Water Stress Conditions},
   journal = {International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology},
   volume = {6},
   number = {2},
   year = {2016},
   pages = {130--136},
   keywords = {Community percent; Pumice; Water stress; Weed species},
   abstract = {A factorial experiment (using RCBD design) with three replications was conducted in 2014 at the University of Tabriz-Iran, in order to determine the effects of pumice application (P1, P2, P3 and P4: control, 30, 60 and 90 tons per ha) on soil and water stress (I1, I2 and I3: 100%, 70% and 50% water requirement calculated from class A pan, respectively) on dominante weeds community percent. Results showed that community percent of weed species changed as a result of water stress and pumice application on soil. Distributions of Chenopodium album and Malva sylvestris were sensitive to water stress but, Amaranthus retroflexus and Solanum nigrum were neutral to water stress. In contrast, Amaranthus retroflexus, Cardaria draba, Setaria viridis, Sisymbrium irio, Xanthium strumarium, Convolvulus arvensis and Salsola rigida distribution were resistant to water stress. Community percent of Chenopodium album as sensitive species to water stress and Salsola rigida as resistance species to water stress positively affected by pumice application especially under water stress condition. Amaranthus retroflexus, Xanthium strumarium and Convolvulus arvensis were positively affected by pumice application under well and limited water supply conditions. In contrast, Cardaria draba, Sisymbrium irio and Solanum nigrum negatively affected by pumice under water stress and it had positive effect on community of these species under well watering conditions. Thus, application of pumice and water stress are two factors which change weed community precent.},
   issn = {2088-5334},
   publisher = {INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development},
   url = {http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=658},
   doi = {10.18517/ijaseit.6.2.658}
}

EndNote

%A Zarehaghi, Davoud
%A Nasiri, Mehdi
%A Neyshabouri, Mohammad Reza
%D 2016
%T Some Weeds Community Percent in Response to Pumice Application on Soil under Water Stress Conditions
%B 2016
%9 Community percent; Pumice; Water stress; Weed species
%! Some Weeds Community Percent in Response to Pumice Application on Soil under Water Stress Conditions
%K Community percent; Pumice; Water stress; Weed species
%X A factorial experiment (using RCBD design) with three replications was conducted in 2014 at the University of Tabriz-Iran, in order to determine the effects of pumice application (P1, P2, P3 and P4: control, 30, 60 and 90 tons per ha) on soil and water stress (I1, I2 and I3: 100%, 70% and 50% water requirement calculated from class A pan, respectively) on dominante weeds community percent. Results showed that community percent of weed species changed as a result of water stress and pumice application on soil. Distributions of Chenopodium album and Malva sylvestris were sensitive to water stress but, Amaranthus retroflexus and Solanum nigrum were neutral to water stress. In contrast, Amaranthus retroflexus, Cardaria draba, Setaria viridis, Sisymbrium irio, Xanthium strumarium, Convolvulus arvensis and Salsola rigida distribution were resistant to water stress. Community percent of Chenopodium album as sensitive species to water stress and Salsola rigida as resistance species to water stress positively affected by pumice application especially under water stress condition. Amaranthus retroflexus, Xanthium strumarium and Convolvulus arvensis were positively affected by pumice application under well and limited water supply conditions. In contrast, Cardaria draba, Sisymbrium irio and Solanum nigrum negatively affected by pumice under water stress and it had positive effect on community of these species under well watering conditions. Thus, application of pumice and water stress are two factors which change weed community precent.
%U http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=658
%R doi:10.18517/ijaseit.6.2.658
%J International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology
%V 6
%N 2
%@ 2088-5334

IEEE

Davoud Zarehaghi,Mehdi Nasiri and Mohammad Reza Neyshabouri,"Some Weeds Community Percent in Response to Pumice Application on Soil under Water Stress Conditions," International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 130-136, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.6.2.658.

RefMan/ProCite (RIS)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zarehaghi, Davoud
AU  - Nasiri, Mehdi
AU  - Neyshabouri, Mohammad Reza
PY  - 2016
TI  - Some Weeds Community Percent in Response to Pumice Application on Soil under Water Stress Conditions
JF  - International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology; Vol. 6 (2016) No. 2
Y2  - 2016
SP  - 130
EP  - 136
SN  - 2088-5334
PB  - INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
KW  - Community percent; Pumice; Water stress; Weed species
N2  - A factorial experiment (using RCBD design) with three replications was conducted in 2014 at the University of Tabriz-Iran, in order to determine the effects of pumice application (P1, P2, P3 and P4: control, 30, 60 and 90 tons per ha) on soil and water stress (I1, I2 and I3: 100%, 70% and 50% water requirement calculated from class A pan, respectively) on dominante weeds community percent. Results showed that community percent of weed species changed as a result of water stress and pumice application on soil. Distributions of Chenopodium album and Malva sylvestris were sensitive to water stress but, Amaranthus retroflexus and Solanum nigrum were neutral to water stress. In contrast, Amaranthus retroflexus, Cardaria draba, Setaria viridis, Sisymbrium irio, Xanthium strumarium, Convolvulus arvensis and Salsola rigida distribution were resistant to water stress. Community percent of Chenopodium album as sensitive species to water stress and Salsola rigida as resistance species to water stress positively affected by pumice application especially under water stress condition. Amaranthus retroflexus, Xanthium strumarium and Convolvulus arvensis were positively affected by pumice application under well and limited water supply conditions. In contrast, Cardaria draba, Sisymbrium irio and Solanum nigrum negatively affected by pumice under water stress and it had positive effect on community of these species under well watering conditions. Thus, application of pumice and water stress are two factors which change weed community precent.
UR  - http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=658
DO  - 10.18517/ijaseit.6.2.658

RefWorks

RT Journal Article
ID 658
A1 Zarehaghi, Davoud
A1 Nasiri, Mehdi
A1 Neyshabouri, Mohammad Reza
T1 Some Weeds Community Percent in Response to Pumice Application on Soil under Water Stress Conditions
JF International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology
VO 6
IS 2
YR 2016
SP 130
OP 136
SN 2088-5334
PB INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development
K1 Community percent; Pumice; Water stress; Weed species
AB A factorial experiment (using RCBD design) with three replications was conducted in 2014 at the University of Tabriz-Iran, in order to determine the effects of pumice application (P1, P2, P3 and P4: control, 30, 60 and 90 tons per ha) on soil and water stress (I1, I2 and I3: 100%, 70% and 50% water requirement calculated from class A pan, respectively) on dominante weeds community percent. Results showed that community percent of weed species changed as a result of water stress and pumice application on soil. Distributions of Chenopodium album and Malva sylvestris were sensitive to water stress but, Amaranthus retroflexus and Solanum nigrum were neutral to water stress. In contrast, Amaranthus retroflexus, Cardaria draba, Setaria viridis, Sisymbrium irio, Xanthium strumarium, Convolvulus arvensis and Salsola rigida distribution were resistant to water stress. Community percent of Chenopodium album as sensitive species to water stress and Salsola rigida as resistance species to water stress positively affected by pumice application especially under water stress condition. Amaranthus retroflexus, Xanthium strumarium and Convolvulus arvensis were positively affected by pumice application under well and limited water supply conditions. In contrast, Cardaria draba, Sisymbrium irio and Solanum nigrum negatively affected by pumice under water stress and it had positive effect on community of these species under well watering conditions. Thus, application of pumice and water stress are two factors which change weed community precent.
LK http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=658
DO  - 10.18517/ijaseit.6.2.658